News location:

Canberra Today 13°/15° | Friday, April 19, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Fladun / The ugly face of careless cycling

THE other morning, one of my colleagues suffered a hit and run.

Sonya Fladun.
Sonya Fladun.
It wasn’t on the road. Walking on the footpath near Civic she only had time to hear the words “get out of my way” before a large, adult, male cyclist riding at full speed clipped her with his bike. Despite the impact, which was considerable, he didn’t stop and sped off down the street.

My friend was left reeling with blood running down her arm from a gash on her elbow. Fortunately, the collision was witnessed by a security guard in the nearby building. Recognising that she was in shock he took her inside and bandaged her up with his first aid kit. A visit to the doctor was also required.

I’m a great fan of cycling. It’s a great form of exercise. It’s environmentally friendly. The introduction of bike paths and bike lanes on our roads has been a great thing. The more people riding to work, school, to the shops or just for recreation the better.

As a motorist, I am always on the lookout for people on bikes. This has been especially the case in recent years when we’ve been living in a suburb with a higher-than-average number of very serious, I won’t say obsessive, cyclists taking advantage of the roads towards Mt Stromlo and beyond for training. I’m a great fan of flashing bike lights, high-viz vests and lots of reflectors.

I know that plenty of cyclists have concerns about the behaviour of motorists and we need more work in improving the awareness of drivers to the safety needs of cyclists.

That said, the incident involving my friend isn’t an isolated one.

Over recent years I’ve seen plenty of aggressive and anti-social behaviour by predominantly male cyclists riding with little or no care for the safety of pedestrians. My kids have had near misses from speeding cyclists and I’ve seen elderly pedestrians startled and effectively shoved out of the way.

There does seem to be an increasing element of testosterone-charged, lycra-clad belligerence that’s a menace on both roads and footpaths – especially to the elderly and young children.  

Although the incidence of collisions involving cyclists and pedestrians that result in serious injury still appears pretty low, it’s likely to rise with an ageing population and efforts by government and politicians to promote cycling as a healthy, environmentally responsible activity.

Cyclists in the ACT are permitted to ride on footpaths. I think sharing this space is pretty sensible as the risks to cyclists in heavy or speeding traffic can’t be denied. But there needs to be rather more emphasis on getting cyclists to give way to pedestrians, as they are required to do, and to cutting down their speed.

Pedestrians ought to be able to stroll on the footpath without looking over their shoulder for fear of being hit in the back by a cyclist.

Motorists are required to stop after an accident. A hit and run on the footpath is just as unconscionable.

All this is common sense, though one should never presume that is in oversupply, and there certainly seems to be a shortage between the ears of some of our lycra-clad speedsters.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

8 Responses to Fladun / The ugly face of careless cycling

LisaCC says: 14 October 2015 at 12:12 pm

Not sure if the incident of cyclists colliding with pedestrian is fairly low. I think we all know people who have been knocked over by a bike, some injured quite seriously with repercussions for years. I have never heard of figures being collected. Nowhere is allocated for pedestrians only so any walk in the ACT is fraught with danger as we have to watch behind us, and in every direction for our kids and dogs, for someone speeding past. I can’t believe the huge amount of cyclists who wear black and other dark colours on the roads. Many of whom have cameras strapped on their helmets or bike handles. Are they looking for trouble to make a point? They are dangerous and there is no way of identifying them in the case of an accident.

Reply
L says: 14 October 2015 at 4:05 pm

Classy… NOT. Ride to work day, hundreds of ordinary people on bikes out and about today, and you post inflammtory clickbait!

Reply
Randi says: 14 October 2015 at 4:59 pm

RTT

I totally agree with your comments. I come from Denmark, a nation of cyclists, but NOT the aggressive lycra-clad type, the commuting type that don’t need to look like Tour de France to get on their bikes. There should be room for everyone.

Reply
Elle D says: 15 October 2015 at 10:21 pm

Quite new to ACT, what is the deal with arrogant cyclists 2-3-sometimes 4 astride along Tidbinbilla/Cotter Road. Single file is common road sense. Go live out your Tour de France fantasies somewhere else.

Reply
André says: 21 October 2015 at 12:42 pm

It’s legal for cyclists to ride two abreast on roads. Riding side by side is also more social as you can have a 2-way conversation. When I ride on Cotter Road and I hear a car coming I try to switch to single file. We do this because motorists are so dangerous and arrogant, except me and you Elle, but then I don’t want to lump all motorists in the one category as that would be stereotyping!
You may also find 3 cyclists riding side by side when a cyclist is overtaking two cyclists riding two abreast.
Come 1-Nov, you will need to give 1.5m clearance to cyclists and other vulnerable road users if you overtake them on Cotter Road.

Reply
The careless face of columnists says: 16 October 2015 at 9:52 pm

There are very few injuries because it’s so vanishingly uncommon for injuries to occur, despite innumerable opinion articles from public health luminaries such as Shane Warne and Miranda Devine, and ‘that almost happened to my granny’ stories that proliferate across any article associated with cycling.

This article trades off stereotypes and prejudices and splits the world between them (obsessive, dangerous, lycra clad speedsters) and us (caring, thoughtful motorists).

As a male (shock) who wears lycra (horror!) and rides a bike, sometimes quickly (OMG) I also ride carefully around walkers. I even drive a car sometimes! But when I do drive a car I’m not held accountable for every motoring related incident or act of irresponsibility that occurs on the road – novel idea, right?

Perhaps try joining the masses, hopping on a bike and ride somewhere, you might enjoy it (lycra optional).

Reply
Nice Cyclist says: 31 October 2015 at 5:17 pm

What an unbalanced piece. From this one anecdote we are to conclude cyclists are mindless maniacs. This does not reflect reality. I have seen cyclo-paths on the cycle paths but they are so rare they hardly warrant this mean-spirited outburst at cyclists.

Reply
Lisa says: 2 November 2015 at 10:04 am

OMG! I can’t believe the touchy bike supporters. If someone says to me “my friend was collected by a crazy car driver” I, and anyone else in the conversation, agrees there are dangerous or erratic drivers out there and we all have a story. Yet someone states their friend was collected by a bicycle rider there is absolute denial that it ever happens and is taken as a group insult to all bike riders.
I did not see blanket generic terms in this article, or most conversations, that refers to anyone/everyone who owns or rides a bike. I read “some”.
Get over yourselves. Can’t we have a conversation about the crazy unthinking car drivers, truck drivers, motorcyclists and bike riders without this group of “everybody is picking on me because I ride a bike”???

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews