IT was interesting to read Michael Moore’s comments on the commercialisation of the Anzac brand.

I, too, have mixed feelings about this and wonder what the Anzacs would think about it. How much is too little advertising and how much is too much? When a company melds its catch-phrase with the memories of the Anzacs that is definitely too much, however, to use this as a political opportunity to have a go at Senator Zed Seselja is out of line for Michael.

His only complaint here is that Zed had his photo on the advertising. Michael’s Anzac article has Michael’s photo on it. Where’s the difference here? I was waiting for Michael to say Zed shouldn’t be using the name Zed because it is part of Anzac.

Rob Keating, Wanniassa