Leigh urged to get behind Gonski

Share Canberra's trusted news:

Member for Fraser Andrew Leigh.
Teachers and parents in the ACT electorate of Fraser have urged Labor backbencher Andrew Leigh to support the Gonski Review recommendations that would deliver, on average, an additional $1500 a year per public school student.

“Mr. Leigh needs to know that denying our children the resources they need is unacceptable,” says Australian Education Union federal president Angelo Gavrielatos.

The call is part of the national  I Give a Gonski Campaign to overhaul school funding. More than 25,000 people have registered support at igiveagonski.com.au. Parents and teachers will get together during morning teas across the country on July 24th to urge politicians to act on the Gonski recommendations on education.

Established by the Federal Government, the  review of school funding, headed by David Gonski, found Australia is investing too little in education and recommended an urgent overhaul of the way schools are funded. Gonski recommends a $5 billion annual increase in school funding, with $3.8 billion to go to public schools.

For an average-sized, local public school with 300 students, the Gonski recommendations are equivalent to $450,000 annual funding to lower class sizes, employ specialist teachers in areas such as literacy and numeracy and provide extra support for students with higher needs.

“The Gonski Review makes clear the cost of inaction,” says Gavrielatos.

“The failure to deliver adequate resources to schools is holding Australian children back and making it harder for them to get the skills and knowledge they need for secure, well-paid jobs.

“But so far there is no commitment to deliver the additional funding Gonski warns is urgently needed.”

 

Who Can You Trust?

In a world beleaguered by spin and confused messages, there's never been more need for diverse, trustworthy, independent journalism in Canberra.

Who can you trust? Well, for more than 25 years, "CityNews" has proudly been an independent, free, family-owned news magazine, serving the national capital with quality, integrity and authority. Through our weekly magazine and daily through our digital platforms, we constantly and reliably deliver high-quality and diverse opinion, news, arts, socials and lifestyle columns.

If you trust our work online and believe in the power of independent voices, I encourage you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support will be invested back into our journalism so we can continue to provide a valuably different view of what's happening around you and keep citynews.com.au free.

Click here to make your donation and you will be supporting the future of journalism and media diversity in the ACT.

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Previous articleBrothel owners bashed
Next articleReview: ‘Flute’ hits highs – and lows

1 COMMENT

  1. Sadly, the Gonski Review failed to identify an alternative to the SES (Socio Economic Status) ranking for school funding, which was one of the primary motivators for setting up the Review. Continuing with the SES ranking, or even a modified version, means continuing with a seriously flawed model. In the ACT in particular, the SES ranking does not accurately assess a school’s wealth or need. Early modelling of the funding outcomes for ACT schools under Gonski triggers alarm bells. This modelling for each school should be made public. Such transparency is an essential pre-requisite to an informed judgment on whether Gonski’s recommendations do in fact produce fair and equitable outcomes, specifically for ACT schools. Can we please have the real ACT data published?

Leave a Reply