News location:

Canberra Today 7°/13° | Tuesday, April 23, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Opposition still unconvinced by light rail

THE ACT Opposition is keeping up the pressure on the proposed Capital Metro light rail project, with Shadow Transport Minister Alistair Coe today arguing not enough commuters will switch from cars to trams to justify the expenditure.

Alistair Coe.
Alistair Coe.
The Canberra Liberals have expressed considerable scepticism of the light rail project recently, arguing the Government have not spelled out its benefits clearly enough.

A spokesperson confirmed the party’s official position was that it had not yet ruled out supporting the Capital Metro but said there was “growing concern” in the ranks.

Mr Coe says light rail will cost the territory $433,333 for each commuter the ACT Government expects to switch to public transport after the Civic to Gungahlin tram line is built.

“The Government has stated that light rail patronage will be 4,500 people in the morning peak,” he says in today’s statement. “However, currently 3,000 commuters ride ACTION on Northbourne in the morning.”

An artist's impression of the light rail along Northbourne Avenue, which Alistair Coe calls "inaccurate".
An artist’s impression of the light rail along Northbourne Avenue, which Alistair Coe calls “inaccurate”.
“To spend so much money on an additional 1,500 people seems extraordinary and will hardly make a dent on the number of cars.”

Mr Coe also raised the prospect that traffic on Northbourne could get worse “if trams are given priority at intersections and dart across Northbourne Avenue twice to pull in and out of the Dickson station”.

“The Government has not made a good case for why light rail needs to be built at taxpayers’ expense,” he said, also criticising the Government’s artist impressions of the tram line as “inaccurate”.

UPDATE, 3.20pm:

Territory and Municipal Services Minister Shane Rattenbury has issued an angry response to Mr Coe’s claims, which he says are “so simplistic they are embarrassing”.

“They pick one projected cost and divide it by an estimated passenger increase for one random point in time, with no consideration of other factors – it’s almost like dividing two random numbers together,” Mr Rattenbury said in the statement this afternoon.

Shane Rattenbury
Shane Rattenbury
“It doesn’t take into account any factors like population growth, the longevity of the rail system, environmental benefits, development opportunities or modal shift benefits on the whole transport network.

“An economic consultant conducted a cost-benefit analysis of the light rail project and showed that for every dollar invested in light rail, the Canberra community will receive over two dollars in benefits.”

Mr Rattenbury said it was clear that Mr Coe and the Canberra Liberals opposed light rail and that they had “no idea how public transport or major projects work”.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

One Response to Opposition still unconvinced by light rail

Zack Gamon says: 22 October 2013 at 2:14 pm

Comments on “The Light Rail Integration Study…looking at integrating the light rail corridor from Gungahlin to the City Centre with the broader public transport network, as well as the requirements of intermodal stations and stops along the route.”

Pros
• Theoretically more people would be using light rail and there would be less cars on the road – less carbon monoxide emission and less congestion along Northbourne Avenue.
• Above point is especially relevant if the light rail is well linked to good efficient bus system with “park n ride” supporting facilities.

Cons
• In light of the population (esp. likely shrinkage of the Public Service work force based in Canberra) and the geographical and demographic spread of Canberra, cost effectiveness of such a major capital project is a significant worry and very likely economically unsustainable for years to come.
• If government/s (local & federal) were to fund the light rail without the injection of private funds, tax payers will likely end up funding an underutilized system for generations to come; money could be better spent on other priority projects and areas.
• As with the tunnels around Brisbane, people did not use them as much because the cost is prohibitive, despite projections on usage. Also, most of the Brisbane tunnels were not through traffic from end to end but a series of ad hoc stretches of tunnels surfacing onto major roads, causing bottle necks and congestions, esp. during peak hours. It is envisaged that if Canberra were to have a light rail system from Gungahlin to City Centre, people from and around Gungahlin may benefit from such a system, but the majority of Canberrans will be disadvantaged by the lack of it. Again, does the massive cost justify serving only a minority of Canberrans? I wonder if there would be a case of discrimination and unfair levy of rates and taxes esp. if rates and tax payers ended up funding for the light rail…
• If the light rail fares were to be high, commuters will go back to using their cars instead (as most Canberrans have cars which are already registered and insured for use on the roads) – this is the case with practical minded consumers. One may argue that people may not want to pay for parking in the City and/or major town centers; hence the case for using public transport. Fact is, people weigh up various factors, eg. convenience, cost, transporting more than one person, etc. before deciding using one system Vs another. Single commuters (esp. to and from work) may well see it OK to use public transport, but reality is, there is simply not much point leaving the car/s in the garage not used during other times.
• Economy of scale of such an expensive project designed to serve only a small proportion of a small city population is simply unjustifiable and politically irresponsible – Would any politician consider building a mega expensive project in his/her house if s/he were to use it perhaps a couple of times a month, and s/her were to borrow the money to fund the project?
• The green belt of trees along Northbourne Avenue helps in greening our environment and proudly heralds to all that one is entering the nation’s capital. There will not be any room for trees if the light rail were to be constructed along the Avenue.

Overall Comments
• The current proposal of a light rail system servicing Gungahlin and Canberrra City is economically unjustifiable and it will be irresponsible for politicians to subject people to fund and pay for such an expensive and limiting project for years to come.
• Politicians and policy makers would be better off to consider alternatives and think outside the box. Example: restricting the number of right and/or left turn offs from Northbourne Ave during peak hours hence improving flow through traffic; extended designated bus lanes only along Northbourne Avenue during peak hours; restricting heavy vehicles travelling along Northbourne Ave during peak hours…
• If a light rail system is still favoured, consider the possibility for future expansion and development of the light rail system into a fast train system linking the major cities along the Eastern States (which all sides of politics have been talking about for the past decades). This means designing and planning for a light rail system that is capable for upgrade in the future, serving all Canberrans and visitors to the Capital.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Update

X threatened with fines over graphic material

The eSafety Commissioner could use an extraordinary power to force telcos to block access to social media site X, formerly Twitter, as the company cops scorn from politicians for fighting an order to take down graphic material.

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews