News location:

Canberra Today 12°/15° | Friday, April 19, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Supabarn fined for deceptive juice labelling

juice

CANBERRA’S Supabarn and The Real Juice Company have each paid penalties totalling $20,400, following infringement notices from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) in relation to claims made about juice products from their private label range of juices.

The ACCC issued the infringement notices because it had reasonable grounds to believe that Supabarn, a supermarket operator, and The Real Juice Company, a juice manufacturer, had made false or misleading representations about the composition of the private label 2 litre apple juice and 2 litre cranberry juice products, in contravention of the Australian Consumer Law.

The ACCC considered the labelling of the apple juice product made the false or misleading representation that the product was made from fresh apples grown in Australia through use of the phrases:

  • “It’s produced locally using the freshest quality Apples”
  • “Straight From a Farm”
  • “Made in Griffith”

When the product was made from reconstituted apple juice concentrate imported from China.

The ACCC considered the labelling of the cranberry juice product made the false or misleading representation that the product did not contain added sugar or any other additives through use of the phrases:

  • “No added sugar; No artificial flavours; No artificial colours; No preservatives”
  • “So if you like your juice fresh with nothing else added”
  • “It’s really just fruit juice!”

When the product contained added sugar and other additives.

“Truth in advertising is a priority area for the ACCC. Consumers should be able to make informed purchasing decisions and not be misled regarding the composition of products,” ACCC Chairman Rod Sims said.

“The claims we say were made versus the reality in this situation are very concerning, particularly given recent controversy over the source of some food products. In addition, false or misleading claims of this kind not only mislead consumers, but can also disadvantage competing suppliers in the market, especially those who are using Australian grown fruit.”

“Both manufacturers and retailers can be responsible for representations made on packaging or labelling of the products they supply, and each level in the supply chain should have systems in place to ensure that their products are compliant with the Australian Consumer Law,” Mr Sims said.

From at least January 2014 to March 2015, The Real Juice Company manufactured and supplied nine flavoured juices to Supabarn under a private label contract. Both companies ceased supplying these juice products after becoming aware of the ACCC’s concerns.

The payment of a penalty specified in an infringement notice is not an admission of a contravention of the Australia Consumer Law. The ACCC can issue an infringement notice where it has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened certain consumer protection laws.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Wine

Cold comfort drinking red wine in Japan

"Drinking mostly Japanese beer and sake with food wasn’t a difficulty, but for lovers of red wine though, expect to have to warm your glass to let the wine reach room temperature," writes RICHARD CALVER, home from a holiday in Japan. 

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews