So what went wrong for the Northbourne trees?

Share Canberra's trusted news:

northbourne trees

THE Liberals’ Alistair Coe is asking unkind questions about the Government justifications for clear felling the urban forest of Northbourne Avenue to make way for light rail.

“Simon Corbell and his assistant Shane Rattenbury need to explain why the health of trees on Northbourne Avenue seems to have deteriorated so rapidly since a report in 2010 stated most were in good condition. The government has said they need to bechopped down because the trees are dying. Is that just a convenient excuse to further the light rail project?” Alistair asked.

“The ‘Tree Inventory Report for ACT Government’ prepared by a consultant is dated in 2010 and was obtained under freedom of information last year. This report seems to show that the trees between the City and Dickson are performing well, contrary to what Mr Corbell and Mr Rattenbury now believe.”

tree report

“If a Liberal government proposed chopping down 484 trees, there would be an outcry from Labor and the Greens and they would be chaining themselves to those trees.

“However, because of their blind determination to proceed with light rail, Labor and the Greens have double standards. The government needs to offer an explanation,” Mr Coe concluded.

Who Can You Trust?

In a world beleaguered by spin and confused messages, there's never been more need for diverse, trustworthy, independent journalism in Canberra.

Who can you trust? Well, for more than 25 years, "CityNews" has proudly been an independent, free, family-owned news magazine, serving the national capital with quality, integrity and authority. Through our weekly magazine and daily through our digital platforms, we constantly and reliably deliver high-quality and diverse opinion, news, arts, socials and lifestyle columns.

If you trust our work online and believe in the power of independent voices, I encourage you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support will be invested back into our journalism so we can continue to provide a valuably different view of what's happening around you and keep free.

Click here to make your donation and you will be supporting the future of journalism and media diversity in the ACT.

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Previous articleRecognise these suspects to a Bunda Street assault?
Next articleGovernment planning over-rides get a tick


  1. Any Arborist will tell you there is nothing wrong with these trees and the vast majority are in good health. It will be a shame to see them go.

  2. Can’t believe that Shane Rattenbury, Simon Corbell and Capital Metro have told so many blatant lies on this issue. All along they’ve said – ‘these trees are close to death, they need to be removed!’. Even the Capital Metro survey last year asked questions such as ‘Bearing in mind that the trees in the Northbourne Ave median strip are in poor health and will need to be removed soon anyway, do you support these trees being removed and replaced with light rail ?’

    In other jurisdictions people have lost their jobs for less than this

  3. Politics takes a most interesting turn when the government themselves become the ‘rapacious developer’.
    I think the Metro vision is a brave and visionary idea for Canberra, though not at ‘any cost’. This cost now seems to also encompass the honesty and integrity of our Members in pressing their plans to realisation.

Leave a Reply