Griffiths / The problem with bigots

Share Canberra's trusted news:

POLITICAL correctness, we endlessly hear, is running amok. And yet it’s hard to imagine that 30 years ago arrant bigotry as espoused by Andrew Bolt, Pauline Hanson and Sonia Kruger would have been allowed free rein in the nation’s media.

John Griffiths.
John Griffiths.

Which suggests to me that the problem is not so much that views are being censored, as much as bigoted blowhards are increasingly being told to sit down and shut the hell up.

The problem with blowhards is that they’ve spent a lifetime thinking that their family and colleagues agree with them. The reality more often is that those unfortunate enough to share space with them have smiled, nodded, and made for the exits.

In these days of the run-amok, politically correct, horrendous people are finding out what other people actually think of them.

The transition, of course, is going to be bumpy. The longer the decades one has been tolerated, the angrier the response will be when tolerance comes to a frayed and tattered end.

The most annoying thing about the rallying cries of the bigots is their appeals to fear.

They wrap themselves in flags, talk in shrill tones about the need to “get tough”, and then act out of complete cowardice.

I’m a 40-something, white, male Australian who likes rugby and tanks. I’ve had more than my fair share of privilege in this world.

Having said that, I’ve enjoyed far less privilege than the likes of Kruger and Bolt.

But I am not afraid of refugees and migrants who want to make a better life in my country.

It’s almost sad how these very wealthy and powerful people are struck dumb with terror at the simple audacity of people other than themselves daring to live.

Speaking different languages, eating different food, worshipping slightly different gods. What is the world coming to?

We have laws to punish those who harm others in our society.

Statistics strongly indicate that they, and you and me, are in far more danger from other Australians than anyone else.

But why not, the demagogues think to themselves, whip up hatred and fear of some of the world’s least powerful and with it least-dangerous people?

I suppose they think that if it harvests votes and electoral dollars, if it sells copies of the “Herald Sun”, if it drives clicks and creates relevance, then why not pander to the worst in society at the expense of the most vulnerable?

I am far more afraid of anyone who can think like this and already wields considerable power, than I am of a cleaner, a taxi driver or a kebab vendor.

Sadly, a percentage of the Australian public are scared, confused and, in a small number of cases, downright awful.

Sadly, some people can make careers and live fat and happy by pandering to those segments of the community.

That’s no reason to let these fringe dwellers take over the public debate.

John Griffiths is the online editor of

Who Can You Trust?

In a world beleaguered by spin and confused messages, there's never been more need for diverse, trustworthy, independent journalism in Canberra.

Who can you trust? Well, for more than 25 years, "CityNews" has proudly been an independent, free, family-owned news magazine, serving the national capital with quality, integrity and authority. Through our weekly magazine and daily through our digital platforms, we constantly and reliably deliver high-quality and diverse opinion, news, arts, socials and lifestyle columns.

If you trust our work online and believe in the power of independent voices, I encourage you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support will be invested back into our journalism so we can continue to provide a valuably different view of what's happening around you and keep free.

Click here to make your donation and you will be supporting the future of journalism and media diversity in the ACT.

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Previous articleHave you seen Kiet Ho?
Next articleCanberra Confidential / Perils of Pauline


  1. In an effort to be tolerant we have a tendency to lump religions together as a variety of harmless beliefs, as your column illustrates.
    The problem is not bigotry but theological illiteracy. Islam is not another benign set of beliefs; rather it is both a religion and a political ideology.
    US Cardinal Raymond Burke has recently observed that Islam wants to govern the world. Cardinal Burke said he did not want to be disrespectful or generate hostility, but he wanted people to understand that when Muslims become the majority in any country they have the duty to submit the whole population to Shariah, as the Islamic code of law is known. [ref:
    As the Muslim population increases in Australia, incremental changes are taking place as the Islamic culture advances. Some of us have already psychologically surrendered to Islam and are not prepared to examine or criticise it or defend our way life. People who are ashamed of their culture and heritage will not defend it. Those that bravely voice their concerns, such as Sonia Kreuger, are written off as bigots who must be silenced. This bullying of concerned citizens, this failure to defend freedom of speech, must be challenged.

    • US Cardinal Raymond Burke has recently observed that Islam wants to govern the world

      Well a Cardinal would certainly know all about a political ideology that wants to rule the world.

      If we can tolerate Christians in our big strong diverse society we can tolerate some Muslims too.

Leave a Reply