News location:

Canberra Today 2°/5° | Thursday, April 25, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Quirky study challenges old ideas on evolution

NEW research from Australia and Finland could help explain one of nature’s strangest quirks – why some animals forego mating to help other animals procreate.

Co-author Prof Michael Jennions from ANU says the study challenges decades-old ideas about evolution, and why animals behave as they do.

Prof Michael Jennions

He says it was traditionally thought that animals evolved to maximise their reproductive success – sometimes called “Darwinian fitness”.

“It is logical. Any new traits which happen to result in more offspring will eventually spread throughout the population,” Prof Jennions says.

“It is why cheetahs run so fast and dolphins swim so well.”

But why would some animals – like worker bees and meerkats – give up their own chances of reproducing to help others? British zoologist William Hamilton offered a solution back in 1964.

“Hamilton put forward the idea that animals can enhance the number of genes they pass on not only by producing offspring, but by helping relatives,” Prof Jennions says.

“He suggested that animals should strive for high ‘inclusive fitness’ – which takes into account not only an individual’s own offspring, but any impact on its relatives’ reproduction.”

However, he says, a stumbling block in Hamilton’s theory was its claim that an individual’s inclusive fitness should exclude any offspring produced with help from others.

Prof Jennions and his co-author Dr Lutz Fromhage from the University of Jyväskylä in Finland say this is unfeasible in most real-world situations.

“For example, the evolution of the behaviour and morphology of a queen bee cannot be understood in isolation from the help given by workers,” Prof Jennions says.

According to Dr Fromhage, the researchers’ computer simulations show that, to justify inclusive fitness as the thing which individuals evolve to maximise, all offspring – including those produced with help from others – must be taken into account.

“None of the effects of received help should be disregarded or stripped away when measuring inclusive fitness,” Dr Fromhage says.

“Our paper is technical, but the outcome is highly practical.

“Field studies of social evolution, be they on bacteria in hospitals, or hyaena in the wild, are inspired by the idea of inclusive fitness.”

The research has been published online in the journal “Proceedings of the Royal Society B”.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

Leave a Reply

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews