Grumpy / How Canberra was ‘sold’ to developers

Share Canberra's trusted news:
West Basin. Photo: Paul Costigan

Prominent architect JACK KERSHAW, of Kambah, is grumpy about the way town planning is being overlooked in the nation’s capital. 

THE apparent demise of ordered planning in Canberra can be traced to a paradigm shift: development is now largely being “sold” to government.

Architect Jack Kershaw.

For example, the scope and scale of New Acton wasn’t in any town plan. It’s persuasive, cashed-up developers, boasting their long-term commitment, engaged, high-profile, private-sector planners, architects, engineers, heritage experts, etcetera to put together an “irrefutable” scheme for the precinct. 

It was even presented by the developer to an invited audience at the National Gallery theatre. Of course, the authorities couldn’t say no, especially to the money being offered for the land.

However, a close examination of New Acton as-built, reveals major shortcomings, including excessive building bulk at the western end, and traffic issues, which a predetermined government precinct plan would have prevented. 

Now New Acton has now been reportedly on-sold; with its original developer apparently now embarking on a similar approach on cheap land at Dairy Road, Fyshwick, for development never envisaged in any town plan.

Similar forces and processes are involved on the airport land, City Hill, in some new suburbs, and on innumerable “have-a-go” private development projects; as well as in the activities of the City Renewal Authority (developers are even running their own “public” consultation – that’s got a lot of integrity…not!). 

The CRA is removed from the normal planning processes, and is headed up by a largely faceless board with connections to developers and unions. 

It has strong political links, hopefully not like those in the NSW property development scandals of the ’80s and ’90s that ended up in the ICAC. The private-sector-like CRA is mainly looking after the highly significant precincts of Northbourne Avenue and West Basin – not going at all well (to put it mildly), especially in the context of the national capital.

Commercially attractive and innovative as they may be, such privatised methodologies clearly cannot be relied on and (as with building quality) we need to return to normal, professional, public-sector town planning and urban design – however, with perhaps, or even definitely, more creativity and cultural/heritage-awareness. This is the national capital.

Grumpy is an occasional column dedicated to things that get up your nose. Readers are invited to vent (typically around 300 words, please) at editor@citynews.com.au

 

Who Can You Trust?

In a world beleaguered by spin and confused messages, there's never been more need for diverse, trustworthy, independent journalism in Canberra.

Who can you trust? Well, for more than 25 years, "CityNews" has proudly been an independent, free, family-owned news magazine, serving the national capital with quality, integrity and authority. Through our weekly magazine and daily through our digital platforms, we constantly and reliably deliver high-quality and diverse opinion, news, arts, socials and lifestyle columns.

If you trust our work online and believe in the power of independent voices, I encourage you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support will be invested back into our journalism so we can continue to provide a valuably different view of what's happening around you and keep citynews.com.au free.

Click here to make your donation and you will be supporting the future of journalism and media diversity in the ACT.

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Previous articleMajor parties show different sides to development 
Next articleCoe offers a ‘fresh vision and a fresh direction’

Leave a Reply