News location:

Friday, November 22, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Man thrown lifeline backs whistleblower in court battle

Richard Boyle will face trial after the High Court upheld a ruling he did not have legal immunity. (David Mariuz/AAP PHOTOS)

By Dominic Giannini in Canberra

Recovering from a brain aneurysm that left him fighting for life, Dirk Fielding had to contend with the taxman skimming his accounts and threatening his business when he woke.

Mr Fielding does not dispute owing money to the Australian Tax Office after falling behind in his finances, before the medical episode left him on life support for a week and intensive care for a month.

The ATO began to garnish his business accounts, which he said left him financially vulnerable as he was unable to work and facing the prospect of not being able to pay the employees of his publishing company.

Someone had also stolen $823,000 from the business, he alleged.

“I begged for help, I couldn’t talk to anybody and I sent through a fax and Richard Boyle received that fax and rang me up and said, ‘mate, let me look after this’,” he told AAP.

“He lifted the garnish and reversed everything and helped me out… Richard gave me a lifeline.”

Boyle now faces decades behind bars after being charged in 2019 with recording private conversations and documenting sensitive taxpayer information while gathering evidence about ATO debt recovery practices he said were too harsh.

Boyle has pleaded not guilty to 24 offences.

The former ATO official alleged employees were pressured to use aggressive money recovery practices, making an internal complaint before going public with his accusation in 2018.

Transparency advocates call him a whistleblower in need of protection after he blew the lid on heavy-handed tactics used by the ATO to recover debt.

His legal fortunes took a major hit on Thursday when the High Court refused to hear his appeal against previous court rulings that he didn’t have immunity from prosecution despite his lawyers arguing he should be covered by whistleblower protections.

It means he will stand trial, with the upholding of a South Australian court’s decision that federal whistleblower protections did not grant immunity for offences related to gathering evidence.

Mr Fielding said Boyle was genuine in what he was trying to do.

“It’s not in the public interest for the public to be prosecuted, there are no victims out there,” Mr Fielding said.

“It needs someone to sit down and turn around and say, this is just stupid, no one is going to benefit from it.”

The Human Rights Law Centre has called for the Albanese government to uphold a commitment to urgently reform whistleblower laws.

“Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus must ensure Richard Boyle does not go to jail for exposing wrongdoing at the tax office and urgently fix federal whistleblower protections,” senior lawyer Kieran Pender said.

“Whistleblowers make Australia a better place – they should be protected, not prosecuted.”

A spokesperson for the attorney-general said it would be inappropriate to comment as the matter was before the courts.

A directions hearing in South Australia on Monday is set to outline when Boyle will face trial.

A day later, lawyers for David McBride are set to appear before the ACT Supreme Court to challenge his prison sentence for leaking secret defence documents that exposed allegations of Australian war crimes in Afghanistan.

McBride’s appeal is set for a single-day hearing in March 2025.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Australian Associated Press

Australian Associated Press

Share this

One Response to Man thrown lifeline backs whistleblower in court battle

cbrapsycho says: 9 November 2024 at 11:58 am

Richard Boyle’s situation is difficult for him and for the ATO. What the ATO did in harassing people was terrible and Boyle’s actions to stop it and where possible reverse harm were great, as is the exposure of the ATO’s actions to prevent recurrence. Hopefully the ATO execs who encouraged this have had appropriate consequences.

However, I can see the difficulty of excusing Boyle for recording private conversations and sensitive customer info. It wouldn’t be good to encourage such actions of others, without some strong careful rules around it. This issue is not insignificant, despite the good intent.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews