News location:

Sunday, January 12, 2025 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Wilkinson setback in Lehrmann defamation case

A judge ruled Sue Chrysanthou can only ask questions relating to interests of client Lisa Wilkinson. (Dean Lewins/AAP PHOTOS)

By Miklos Bolza in Sydney

TEN journalist Lisa Wilkinson has suffered a legal setback as she defends her defamation case over a report regarding Brittany Higgins’ claim she was raped in a Parliament House office.

Justice Michael Lee rejected an application by Wilkinson’s barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC that she divide up the cross examination of Bruce Lehrmann with Network Ten’s barrister Matthew Collins KC based on individual topics.

Instead, the judge said Ms Chrysanthou could only ask Lehrmann questions relating to the interests of her client and Dr Collins would have to take on the bulk of the interrogation.

“It’s not like some sort of suburban cricket match when you retire on 50 and give someone else a go,” Justice Lee said as the Federal Court case resumed on Monday.

A separate case brought by Wilkinson against Ten in the NSW Supreme Court over $700,000 in legal costs spent defending the defamation case was moved to the Federal Court on Friday after Justice Kelly Rees said the disputes should occur in the same court.

Lehrmann is facing his third day in the witness box and has faced a sustained attack on his credit by Dr Collins.

The law student has sued Network Ten and Wilkinson in the Federal Court over a February 2021 report on The Project in which Ms Higgins was interviewed about the alleged rape.

Lehrmann has denied any sexual contact or intimacy between himself and Ms Higgins during drinks on Friday, March 22, 2019 and in the early hours of the following day when the two attended Parliament House.

Ms Higgins alleges the sexual assault occurred while she was unconscious or semi-conscious in the office of their boss, then defence industry minister Linda Reynolds.

On multiple occasions under questioning by his own barrister Steven Whybrow SC or Ten’s barrister, Lehrmann has insisted nothing happened between himself and Ms Higgins that night apart from him engaging in “very minimal” flirtation at a nightclub.

Lehrmann has settled separate defamation proceedings against News.com.au and the Australian Broadcasting Corporation over their reports about Ms Higgins’ allegations.

The criminal trial in the ACT Supreme Court over Ms Higgins’ alleged rape was derailed by juror misconduct and prosecutors did not seek a second trial because of concerns over her mental health.

A landmark report into the ACT legal system and the Higgins case was released in August, making damning findings against now ex-director of public prosecutions Shane Drumgold over his conduct during the case.

Lehrmann has separately been accused of raping another woman twice in Toowoomba in October 2021.

He has yet to enter a plea in that case, but his lawyers have indicated that he denies the charges.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Australian Associated Press

Australian Associated Press

Share this

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews