News location:

Friday, November 15, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Reynolds cast as ‘villain’ in Higgins’ ‘fairytale’

Mediation failed to resolve Linda Reynolds’ defamation claims against ex-staffer Brittany Higgins. (Mick Tsikas/AAP PHOTOS)

By Aaron Bunch in Perth

Liberal Senator Linda Reynolds was cast as a “villain” in a fictional political cover-up created by her former staffer Brittany Higgins and her husband David Sharaz, a defamation trial has been told.

The former defence minister is suing Ms Higgins over a series of social media posts she says damaged her reputation as she pursues vindication for alleged mistruths.

Lawyer Martin Bennett told the Western Australian Supreme Court that “every fairy tale needed a villain”, and Ms Higgins and Mr Sharaz “cast Senator Reynolds in that role for their fictional story of a cover-up”.

He said the fiction included allegations of ill-treatment, ostracisation, bullying, harassment and threatening conduct.

“She was cast in … critical light and none of it was true,” he said on Friday during his opening submissions.

Mr Bennett reminded the court about the details of Ms Higgins’ personal injury claim over the alleged mishandling of her rape allegation that the Commonwealth settled for $2.4 million.

“The claims made by Ms Higgins were false and Senator Reynolds was denied the appropriate venue, the appropriate time, the appropriate funding by the Commonwealth to defend the actions of herself and her staff,” he said.

Mr Bennett read a series of Ms Higgins’ text messages with her then-boyfriend to rebut one of Ms Higgins’ claims that she was ostracised and spent six weeks in a Perth hotel room working seven days a week during the 2019 election campaign.

“This will be my 15 minutes of fame. I’ll be in the back of the PM’s announcement,” he said reading one that referred to Ms Higgins standing behind former prime minister Scott Morrison at a press conference.

Others detailed how Ms Higgins had toured Perth’s sites, went to the beach, had a buffet dinner with friends and attended Senator Reynolds’ birthday dinner.

Mr Bennett also explored the night Ms Higgins was allegedly raped in Parliament House and  events in the weeks after.

“She’s just been appointed the Minister for Defence Industry and she’s got a security breach in her own office by two of her staff,” he said.

He said Senator Reynolds reacted protectively towards Ms Higgins and told her then-chief of staff Fiona Brown to go to the Australian Federal Police to help get to the bottom of the incident.

“Ms Higgins couldn’t remember,” Mr Bennett said.

He detailed the support given to Ms Higgins and how members of the Morrison government wanted her to report the matter to police but she refused.

He said Ms Higgins’ later claims she wasn’t supported were “made up” and “attributed a callousness to Senator Reynolds that was wrong”.

Senator Reynolds took offence at tweets on the social media platform X and Instagram posts published in 2022 and 2023.

One of the Instagram posts implied the senator mishandled Ms Higgins’ rape allegation against colleague Bruce Lehrmann by failing to provide support, her statement of claim says.

The post also allegedly suggested the senator acted questionably during Lehrmann’s trial and engaged in a campaign of harassment towards Ms Higgins.

Another post published by Ms Higgins’ husband David Sharaz – which the claim says the couple was jointly responsible for – implied the senator pressured her former staffer not to continue with her sexual assault complaint to police.

The claim also said Ms Higgins’ conduct was aggravated because it was part of a “malicious” plan, created by her and Mr Sharaz, that alleged the senator was involved in a political cover-up of the rape allegation.

This allegedly led to Ms Higgins’ interviews with Lisa Wilkinson on Network Ten’s The Project and Samantha Maiden from News Corp in 2021.

Ms Higgins’ defence relies on truth and that it was reasonable to comment and provide opinion on issues of public interest concerning government and political matters.

Lehrmann has always denied the sexual assault allegation. His criminal trial was aborted because of juror misconduct and Ms Higgins’ mental health was cited as the reason for no retrial.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

One Response to Reynolds cast as ‘villain’ in Higgins’ ‘fairytale’

David says: 2 August 2024 at 1:17 pm

‘Time for Truth’ ? When has truth had anything to do with what’s transpired so far ? Not sure about Reynolds but so far Higgins, Lehrmann, Channel 7 & 10 plus Wilkinson all have negative credibility. If Higgins were to win then it goes against Lee’s findings yet Lee’s findings go against common sense and method and motive are not enough, especially where physical evidence could and should have been collected. So how do you suppose ‘truth’ has any part to play? “You can’t handle the truth” is very poignant and the legal system has gone a long way to ensure it’s operation is not tainted by it.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews