News location:

Thursday, December 26, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

ACT senator could support self-governance, but not euthanasia

AN ACT senator has given his blessing should the territory determine it wants to cut legal ties with the Commonwealth government.

But federal Liberal Senator Zed Seselja was demanding to attach preconditions for his final vote after thumbing his nose at the territory for only seeking self-governance to overturn parliamentary laws that oppose euthanasia.

Both the ACT and Northern Territory governments have written to their federal counterparts including embattled Attorney-General Christian Porter to restore their rights to legislate on the issue of voluntary assisted dying.

The Commonwealth maintains authority of the ACT and has the right to overturn local laws.

A private member’s bill was introduced in federal parliament in 1996 to override the rights of the terminally ill act that the Northern Territory had first introduced a little more than 12 months earlier.

“This has been considered a number of times and my views have been put on the record a number of times – and that won’t change,” Sen Zed Seselja said on Friday (March 5).

“What I have said on a number of occasions that if the territory wants to have a discussion about broader questions of territory rights, then that’s a discussion I am very open to.

“But if they put it in the context simply of a conscious vote on euthanasia, well, obviously it has been considered by the senate and the parliament.”

ACT Opposition Leader Elizabeth Lee, another Liberal, has even spoken to Prime Minister Scott Morrison in support of letting the nation’s capital vote on euthanasia.

But Sen Seselja, a former government lawyer, declined to touch on whether the parliament has breached its human rights obligation by not allowing the two territories to legislate on the controversial topic.

Only Victoria and Western Australia have approved voluntary assisted dying after the bills in New South Wales, Tasmania and South Australia were all voted down after each of the states came down to a final vote.

“I’d rather defer to other experts,” he said.

He voted against restoring territory rights in the federal parliament on an assisted suicide legislation bill in 2015 that would have given the ACT the authority to legislate over the matter of voluntary assisted dying.

But the outspoken conservative, devout Roman Catholic and former Canberra Liberal leader did not rule out self-governance should it be tied to the territory taking control of its own police force, more senate representation and other issues including euthanasia as “part of a broader discussion” towards possible statehood.

“I think I’d certainly be open to that – it is worth considering,” he said.

“Obviously, federal parliament would have to be convinced as a whole that it was a good idea.

“If that were to come before the parliament, I’d assume it wouldn’t be a conscious vote.”

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Andrew Mathieson

Andrew Mathieson

Share this

2 Responses to ACT senator could support self-governance, but not euthanasia

Anthony says: 6 March 2021 at 7:04 pm

The idea makes no sense to me. This is commonwealth land, only the commonwealth has any sovereignty over it.

Reply
Jim says: 8 March 2021 at 9:45 am

What an embarrassing joke of a representative the big Z really is. What happened to representing the rights of the people you are meant to represent… as always, its all about him and imposing his conservative views onto others.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews