News location:

Friday, November 15, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Give us this day our daily hypocrisy in parliament

House of Representatives Speaker Milton Dick… “Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven!” So, no need for an ICAC in those days. Photo: Lukas Coch/AAP

“Mr Dick intones something that, if you listen closely, can make your hair stand on end,” bemoans “The Gadfly” columnist ROBERT MACKLIN.

UPON taking the speaker’s chair each sitting day, Milton Dick, the Labor MP for Oxley, makes the following declaration: 

Robert Macklin.

“I acknowledge the Ngunnawal and Ngambri peoples who are the traditional custodians of the Canberra area and pay respect to the elders, past and present, of all Australia’s indigenous peoples.”

It’s a 2010 addition to the opening House of Representatives’ ritual and quite a nice idea. Trouble is, since the debate about the Voice to Parliament, it’s obvious that many of Mr Speaker’s fellow MPs – yes, I’m looking at you Peter Dutton and David Littleproud – don’t share his sentiments. 

It’s a rite that’s supposed to make us feel good, but if it doesn’t reflect our MPs’ true sympathies, it debases the notion to a silly fiction and makes a mockery of the parliament. 

But that’s just the beginning of the daily recitation. Mr Dick then intones something that, if you listen closely, can make your hair stand on end. 

He addresses an imaginary entity he calls “Almighty God”, and he “humbly beseeches” said entity “to vouchsafe Thy blessing upon this parliament. Direct and prosper our deliberations to the advancement of thy glory, and the true welfare of the people of Australia”.

If you didn’t know better, you’d think Mr Dick had lost his marbles. So who is this virtual entity and why should it be bothered with the joint Matthew Flinders christened long before the Aboriginal people even heard of its existence. 

Yes, I know it’s a version of the Christian “Lord’s Prayer” and there are shaky claims that it was “written” (in the unlikely event that he could write Greek) by the figure they call Jesus. 

William Knox… first member for Kooyong (1901-1910).

It found its way into the parliamentary ritual, I discovered, when researching “The Big Fella – the BHP Story”, which I wrote with Peter Thompson in 2009. It was introduced in 1901 by the first member for Kooyong, a certain William Knox, the former BHP accountant. 

At the time, parliament had just passed the White Australia Policy thus alienating the Aboriginal people from the land they had occupied for roughly 60,000 years. So it undoubtedly reflected the views of the electors. And since paternalism was all the go, they were perfectly happy for the speaker to address the entity as, “Our father, which art in heaven, hallowed be thy name”. 

“Thy kingdom come,” Mr Speaker continues. “Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven!” So, no need for an ICAC in those days. The socialists are not forgotten, as Mr Speaker says: “Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive them that trespass against us.” 

Forgiving trespasses has never been Peter Dutton’s favoured policy since he became a police cadet straight out of high school and a Liberal candidate at 19, but Mr Dick has already moved on. 

“Lead us not into temptation,” he demands (respectfully), “but deliver us from evil.” And in anticipation of a lordly nod, he wraps it up with the diplomatic niceties: “For thine is the kingdom,” he cries, “and the power and the glory, for ever and ever, amen.” Okay, now it’s on with business as usual. 

But wait a minute. Doesn’t the ritual offend the very basis of our democratic system which requires the clear separation of Church and State? And why exclusively Christian? What of all the other churches, mosques and temples? What of the third of us who mark “no religion” on the census form?

Not good enough Mr Dick. Malcolm Fraser changed the national anthem. Perhaps it’s time for a nationwide competition for a new mission statement – one that not only inspires the parliamentarians but reflects the aspirations of the community they serve. What do you say, Albo?

robert@robertmacklin.com 

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Robert Macklin

Robert Macklin

Share this

2 Responses to Give us this day our daily hypocrisy in parliament

David says: 13 July 2023 at 10:49 am

Interesting that you raise religion and belief. At least the God based beliefs have some form of evidence in the form of written texts to justify their claims. A lot of the history of Australia is all based on belief with some limited archeological evidence. Especially if you consider any observation to be valid needs to be made taking into account any influence the presence of the observer has. You keep placing bails of hay in the middle field and then observe that the fauna have a camp nearby tells you nothing about how the fauna used to behaved before you arrived.

More importantly, for a significant proportion of the last 60,000 years the land mass of Australia was joined to PNG. If we want to go back that far then some inhabitants of PNG probably have more claim to the land we now call Australia than the people making the current claims. They may rightly claim that all the inhabitants of Australia are invaders and oppressors. It is amazing what you can claim when there is no hard evidence, just word of mouth, and ignore inconvenient bits of information.

So, what is the point of these obviously very contentious statements ? Does anyone who really cares about helping those in need really think that repeatedly trying to redefine the past is going to help anything in the future? Especially when we are judging everything by western standards. On one hand we are saying what the west has done to this country is terrible and on the other we are saying equality is when everyone is just like the west. We hate everything the west brings but we demand everything they have. Very hard to help someone who is focused on who to blame for all their problems. You’re just throwing money away funding their quest to blame. You need to get them looking forwards and understanding what they give and especially take. Then it’s money well spent.

If the Voice gets up it may just become something the west can point to and say, its now all your fault. If nothing changes for those in need the smart political thing for the Voice to do is start creating diversions. Lots of high court challenges etc etc. If it doesn’t work it will be even harder to help those in need. It started off looking like a great idea but now looks like a cynical way for the west to sweep the problem under the carpet and shift the blame.

Reply
cbrapsycho says: 13 July 2023 at 12:14 pm

Totally agree!!!! This is disrespectful to so many Australians and to the Constitution. Private beliefs should be kept private, not paraded as if they represent our government.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews