By Katelyn Catanzariti in Sydney
BIG supermarkets are being warned that increased surveillance of shoppers, including close-up cameras on self-checkout screens, is more likely to anger shoppers rather than deter theft.
Consumer behaviour expert Nitika Garg from the School of Marketing at the UNSW Business School says it certainly won’t do much to build trust with customers.
“Especially when, in Australia, we see the billions of dollars in profit that the two largest grocery retailers get,” Professor Garg told AAP.
“(Consumers) feel like ‘you’re making billions of dollars of profit off my back and you’re doing this to me?’
“That will trigger people to engage in deviant behaviour.”
While most shoppers do the right thing, cost-of-living pressures are driving up opportunistic theft, resulting in a surge in shoplifting across the board.
Australian Bureau of Statistics data points to a 17 per cent increase in retail location theft in 2022/23.
In August, Coles chief executive Leah Weckert said shoplifting by organised criminals and customers contributed to an annual 20 per cent rise in stock losses.
“We’re certainly seeing a lot more reports coming through from stores where they see a loss that is quite large and targeted,” she said.
Rightly, supermarkets say they have no choice but to increase surveillance.
Woolworths has announced plans to spend $40 million on CCTV upgrades, body-worn cameras and other surveillance measures. Coles is stepping up security guards at stores and introducing initiatives such as trolley locks and smart gates, and is trialling live camera surveillance on self-checkout screens.
Some checkouts have on-screen cameras and customers see live footage of themselves scanning items.
But many shoppers have taken to social media to voice their disapproval. Some are worried about their privacy and what happens to the footage, while others are just angry about being distrusted.
The issue has been raised on platforms like Reddit and TikTok where users have variously described it as “dystopian” and “invasive”.
“We always knew we were being watched… but this sort of super surveillance is just making consumers feel less trusted,” says Prof Garg.
The researcher also argues the increased scrutiny could trigger some to misbehave, given the propensity of people to retaliate when they feel their freedoms are being restricted or curtailed.
“This is a consequence of psychological reactance; it pushes people to do the opposite of what they are told,” she adds.
One issue is the lack of communication from supermarkets about why they are increasing surveillance.
“A small campaign explaining to the consumer the impacts of shoplifting will help,” Prof Gard said.
“The higher amount of shoplifting takes a hit on all consumers as the price of products is increased to account for the stock loss.”
Major supermarkets such as Coles and Woolworths have privacy policies that address the use of anti-theft measures and adhere to an industry code of conduct.
Who can be trusted?
In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.
If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.
Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.
Thank you,
Ian Meikle, editor
Leave a Reply