News location:

Monday, November 18, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Call for ‘nation-leading’ sexual offences court in ACT

Advocates in the ACT want a specialist, trauma-informed court to deal with sexual offences.

By Tess Ikonomou in Canberra

THE ACT government is considering how to reform the way sexual crimes are dealt with by the criminal justice system, amid calls for a specialist court.

Marisa Paterson, a member of the territory’s Legislative Assembly, and sexual violence responders on Monday urged the territory’s Chief Minister Andrew Barr to introduce a court that would deal solely with sexual offences.

It comes in response to a report on sexual assault prevention, and the inquiry into the handling of high-profile allegations made by former federal Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins that she was raped in Parliament House.

Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury said the government was considering options for reform, but a decision was yet to be made.

“We’re still consulting with relevant stakeholders on the best way to go forward in the ACT,” he said.

Mr Rattenbury said ACT court representatives had questioned whether a dedicated court was the right approach given the size of the jurisdiction.

The feedback also included whether further training for judges would be more beneficial.

“We are interested in finding ways to improve the process further for victim-survivors,” he said.

Dr Paterson said the status quo was not sufficient, with research finding sexual offences were under-reported, under-prosecuted and had low conviction rates.

“I believe here in the ACT we have the opportunity to be nation-leading in how our justice system addresses sexual offences,” she said.

“There is increasing international evidence highlighting the benefits of a specialist, trauma-informed court in progressing justice.”

The latest statistics show there were more than 500 reports of sexual offences to police in the ACT in 2021/22.

Of the cases that did progress to court, only seven per cent resulted in a conviction.

Dr Paterson said the data was exacerbating community concern the system was failing victims.

The Canberra Rape Crisis Centre, Domestic Violence Crisis Service and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Elected Body are among the community organisations that have backed the call in an open letter.

“Victim-survivors of these crimes often report that they experience significant challenges in reporting sexual offences to the police and are often re-victimised through court processes,” the groups said.

A pilot of a specialist court in New Zealand in 2016 was found to have progressed cases quicker, with judges intervening more often to prevent “unacceptable questioning”.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Australian Associated Press

Australian Associated Press

Share this

One Response to Call for ‘nation-leading’ sexual offences court in ACT

David says: 21 August 2023 at 12:52 pm

The challenge of such suggestion is it is hypothetical because there is no guarantee that getting more cases to court will result in more convictions. You also have to be aware of people gaming the system. It only takes one bad case to taint the system for everyone else. It is as important to ensure no-one plays the system with false allegations as it is to provide an easier path for true victims to come forward. Specialists would help in this area. Not only do we need specialists in trauma but also in detecting false allegations. Had such specialists been employed one juror may not have seen the need to try and educate other jurors of the possibilities.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

News

Reasoning can be a long journey to a judge’s decision

Legal columnist HUGH SELBY highlights aspects of the 40,000-word reasoning in a recent High Court of Australia case. He says it wasn't an easy read, but there are important lessons from this exercise, lessons likely to fall upon deaf ears.

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews