News location:

Saturday, November 23, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Bias found in report against Lehrmann trial prosecutor

ACT’s former chief prosecutor Shane Drumgold has won a legal challenge against an inquiry report. (Lukas Coch/AAP PHOTOS)

By Kat Wong in Canberra

A former senior judge who headed a review into Bruce Lehrmann’s rape trial gave rise to a sense of bias, a court has ruled.

Walter Sofronoff KC, who had been president of Queensland’s Court of Appeal, was tasked in 2023 with examining the role of police and prosecutors in the high-profile case.

Though the inquiry’s final report vindicated investigating officers, it found the ACT’s former top prosecutor Shane Drumgold had engaged in malpractice and unethical conduct.

Mr Drumgold launched legal action in August to invalidate the adverse findings against him, with his lawyers claiming Mr Sofronoff’s communications with The Australian’s columnist Janet Albrechtsen had “infected” him with bias.

And on Monday, Justice Stephen Kaye said Mr Sofronoff’s behaviour “gave rise to a reasonable intention of bias”.

“A fair-minded observer might reasonably have apprehended that (Mr Sofronoff) might have been influenced by the views held and publicly expressed by Ms Albrechtsen,” he told the ACT Supreme Court.

Justice Kaye’s decision did not completely vindicate Mr Drumgold, having upheld seven of the eight inquiry findings the prosecutor disagreed with.

But the report’s accusation Mr Drumgold had engaged in “grossly unethical conduct” while cross-examining Senator Linda Reynolds was “legally unreasonable”, Justice Kaye said.

As a result of the decision, the ACT government will cover some of Mr Drumgold’s legal costs, though a figure has not yet been determined.

The inquiry was launched after police and prosecutors made claims about each other’s conduct during the trial of former political staffer Lehrmann.

Prior to Monday’s decision, Mr Drumgold’s lawyer Dan O’Gorman told the court of Mr Sofronoff’s frequent contact with Albrechtsen.

Between February and July 2023, the inquiry head made 65 phone calls to journalists – 55 of which were to those from The Australian and most of the time was spent with Albrechtsen.

During the public hearing part of the inquiry, Mr Sofronoff made 10 calls to The Australian, eight of which were with Albrechtsen.

Mr Drumgold resigned from his role as the ACT’s Director of Public Prosecutions in August after the release of Mr Sofronoff’s report.

In 2019, Lehrmann was accused of raping his then-colleague Brittany Higgins inside the Parliament House office of Senator Reynolds.

But his 2022 ACT Supreme Court trial was abandoned because of jury misconduct and a retrial did not proceed over concerns about Ms Higgins’ health, leaving no findings against him.

Lehrmann has always denied the allegation.

On Friday, the ACT government apologised and paid former defence minister Linda Reynolds $90,000 after Mr Drumgold accused the senator of “disturbing” conduct in a letter of complaint to the Australian Federal Police that was later published in the media.

ACT pays senator $90,000 over trial allegations

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

5 Responses to Bias found in report against Lehrmann trial prosecutor

Curious Canberran says: 4 March 2024 at 4:37 pm

Perhaps I am reading it wrong?
The article starts by stating (Mr. Drumgold) “…has successfully challenged findings…’ but later we learn;
“…Justice Kaye upheld seven of the eight inquiry findings Mr Drumgold disagreed with…”.
With the one item having been found “legally unreasonable” (whatever that means).

To wrap the article up by acknowledging that the ACT (taxpayer) paid for damages and apologised
to Linda Reynolds for defamation, due to Mr. Drumgolds letter, well in my opinion ‘success’
don’t seem like the sort of word I would use here.
In fact, I would go so far to say legal action launched by Mr, Drumgold backfired.

Reply
David says: 5 March 2024 at 8:25 am

A lot of taxpayer money spent trying to determine if two wrongs actually do make a right! One thing this sorry saga has highlighted is how much money can be made by making allegations you know up front cannot be proved either way. Raising more doubts in peoples mind when victims come forward. Something victims don’t need.

Reply
Curious Canberran says: 5 March 2024 at 2:24 pm

I understand a story flagged: ‘update’, in the News overview section means the original content can change.
The quotes that I highlighted in the above feedback – have been adjusted or removed.
Something to bear in mind.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews