News location:

Canberra Today 15°/17° | Wednesday, May 1, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

PM considering tax cut expansion for financial relief

Speculation is growing that the government will make changes to its promised stage three tax cuts. (April Fonti/AAP PHOTOS)

By Kat Wong and Andrew Brown in Canberra

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has vowed tax cuts for all, as the federal government prepares to mull over measures aimed at reducing the cost of living.

As speculation swells over possible changes to controversial stage three tax cuts, Mr Albanese said average-income earners would be the focus of relief measures.

“I support tax cuts and everyone will be getting a tax cut,” he told Sydney radio station KIIS FM on Tuesday.

“What we’re doing is looking at how we can help low and middle-income earners, middle Australia particularly is doing it really tough, people have a mortgage, so we’re looking at ways in which we can provide assistance to them.”

The comments come as reports in the Sydney Morning Herald and the Age say the government is considering scaling back the stage three tax cuts to provide greater financial relief for middle-income workers.

The tax cuts, legislated under the former coalition government, were taken to the past federal election as a commitment by Labor and are due to come into effect from July 1.

Under stage three, a single tax bracket of 30 per cent would be applied to people earning between $45,000 and $200,000 annually.

Federal cabinet meets on Tuesday, ahead of a caucus meeting in Canberra on Wednesday where cost of living measures will be considered by the government.

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said the government’s position on the stage three tax cuts had not changed but it was committed to ease financial strains on households.

“We understand the importance of tax cuts, we’ve said this all along, but let me be clear, we are completely focused on easing the cost of living pressures on middle Australia,” he told reporters in Canberra.

“The inflationary environment around the world has persisted and that is putting pressure on middle Australia.”

But shadow treasurer Angus Taylor said any alterations to stage three cuts would represent a broken election promise.

“This is something the prime minister and treasurer have committed to over 100 times,” he told Seven’s Sunrise program.

“It’s in the legislation and Labor voted for it and it’s been to two elections – so this is not something you change.”

Deputy Nationals Leader Bridget McKenzie also decried the proposition, saying those in the top tax bracket will lose more of their own money.

“It’s absolutely shameful that the government is thinking of re-examining legislated tax cuts,” she told Nine’s Today Show.

“Giving Australians more of their own money back in their pockets to pay their mortgage – which has gone through the roof – the energy bills that they’re all struggling with, is absolutely the right thing to do.”

The Greens have also ramped up calls for the government to ditch the cuts, warning the measure would increase cost-of-living pressures.

Costings received by the party from the Parliamentary Budget Office showed the tax cuts would cost $300 million more in the next year, and $10 billion extra than forecast in the next decade.

In a letter to Treasurer Jim Chalmers, acting Greens leader Mehreen Faruqi said those earning between $50,000 and $75,000 would be contributing the most to government revenue, once the tax cuts and bracket creep were taken into account.

“The stage three tax cuts do not help those most struggling with the increased cost of living,” Senator Faruqi said in the letter.

“It will lead to over $70 billion of additional debt with nothing productive to show for it.”

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Australian Associated Press

Australian Associated Press

Share this

2 Responses to PM considering tax cut expansion for financial relief

cbrapsycho says: 23 January 2024 at 11:01 am

No-one who’s been paying attention to politics (and who is a logical thinker) would pay any serious attention to anything that Angus Taylor or Bridget McKenzie have to say as both have demonstrated their lack of integrity in breaking the rules for their own self-interest. They have not changed their spots.

When the world changes, strategy must change. The tax cuts are still going ahead, just being adjusted for the new economic situation. To do otherwise would be very poor strategy in a time of crisis for many families. This is not a broken promise, as tax cuts will still happen. High income earners get tax cuts that are adjusted to the new economic situation, whilst more cost of living help is provided to those who need it most and that is not the high income earners. To leave low and middle income earners struggling to line the pockets of the rich is both inequitable and morally corrupt, so these changes are necessary. The fairest way to help everyone was always to lift the income tax threshold which benefits everyone.

No money has been taken from high income earners. It’s just that they’re not being so largely enriched at the cost of those doing it tough already. A compassionate person would be happy with a more equitable approach to cost of living problems. Certainly we know some of the independents support this approach, despite them being high income earners. Most Australians do not want to reward greed.

Reply
David says: 23 January 2024 at 3:13 pm

Wow, suddenly simplifying a tax scheme that punishes people for earning more has become morally corrupt and rewarding greed. It could be argued it is morally corrupt to say, just because you earn more you get taxed at a higher rate and greedy to believe those who work harder should pay for those who don’t. But enough of that childish jealousy logic.

What you should be worrying about is whether this tax simplification is actually going to have any significant impact on cost of living and specifically on the cost of living somewhere. The answer is no in the same way provision of social housing will have no meaningful impact. Tax payers simply cannot subsidize the growing number of people struggling to afford to live somewhere.

However, I bet the government love the fools who carry on about tax breaks because it takes the focus away from the problems they really need to be focused on.

Some people having lots of money isn’t the problem nor is the amount of tax they pay. It’s the ability of people who own property, superfluous to their own living needs, to make money out of others who need to live somewhere. Especially when they are subsidized by tax payers to make this money. Paying rent is dead money. start worrying about that. Also, think about how much it actually costs to build something in Australia as compared to other nations.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

News

Brittany likes to have the last word 

Most people dread the process of writing a eulogy, as it typically signifies the death of a close relative or friend. However, for Brittany Davidson eulogy writing has become an integral part of her income. 

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews