News location:

Friday, December 20, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Culture wars reignite over ‘disingenuous’ energy change

The coalition has pledged to build the nuclear reactors on the sites of coal-fired power stations. (Diego Fedele/AAP PHOTOS)

By Marion Rae in Canberra

The climate “culture wars” are back as the coalition prepares to go nuclear, but the clean energy industry has been promised an ongoing role.

Renewables will be part of the energy mix under a coalition government but Labor should stop misleading the public about the success of the rollout, opposition spokesman Ted O’Brien told a clean energy summit in Sydney on Wednesday.

Under Labor, emissions reduction has flatlined, investment has stalled, power prices are going up and there is a threat of blackouts as soon as summer, he said.

“Those in industry are saying Labor’s plan of 82 per cent renewables by 2030 is not achievable … it’s disingenuous and not in the national interest to pretend it is,” he told AAP.

Mr O’Brien said the coalition’s energy policy was based on an “all of the above approach” with an energy mix that puts consumers at the centre.

“Once you do that, you find that you do need to ensure that renewables play, continue to play, an important role as part of a balanced energy mix,” he said.

While there is bipartisanship on net zero by 2050, there are stark contrasts in how to get there, with the coalition pledging to build nuclear reactors at a faster pace than even the nation’s top scientists advise could happen.

Asked whether there could be nuclear reactors online by 2037, Tasmania’s Energy Minister Nick Duigan said “not in Tasmania”, while NSW Energy Minister Penny Sharpe said “not possible”.

ACT Energy Minister Shane Rattenbury slammed the return of the climate “culture wars” and nuclear as “too slow, too expensive.”

Clare Savage, chair of the Australian Energy Regulator, told the summit it would be 2050 before any reactors could be built as it would take a decade to change laws and create safety, environmental and investment frameworks, followed by a 15-year build.

She said nuclear can’t help with the replacement of the coal fleet because it wouldn’t be safe or cheap to keep it running for that long, nor could it help with electrification of industry and transport.

Energy Minister Chris Bowen told the summit’s gala dinner on Tuesday that decisions should be made based on the economics and engineering, with nuclear in Australia failing on both fronts.

“It’s always simpler in politics to be running a simple lie, rather than a complicated truth,” he said.

“We’re running a complicated truth … they do not want this transition to succeed.”

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

2 Responses to Culture wars reignite over ‘disingenuous’ energy change

cbrapsycho says: 17 July 2024 at 3:34 pm

No-one with a functioning brain or decent bull…t antennae believes anything Ted O’Brien has to say. He’s the epitomy of a bad used car salesman. I love that his ‘evidence’ is so specific ie ‘those in industry’. We can only assume that he means those invested in the nuclear industry.

Reply
David says: 17 July 2024 at 4:32 pm

Wow, “it would be 2050 before any reactors could be built as it would take a decade to change laws and create safety, environmental and investment frameworks, followed by a 15-year build”. 11 years to catchup with the rest of the world then 15 to build. That’s stunning. They’ve made it look bad by adding in a huge Australian incompetence factor. I guess there’s nowhere else in the world doing it for us to fast track our experience.

Chris Bowen wants economics and engineering but is allowing one option to be taken off the table due to bureaucratic incompetence on a large scale. Where is his plan for actually storing the renewably generated energy to the level we need? Who’s running the simple lie? Anyone who keeps using “renewable” in the debate is either incompetent or running the simple lie, it’s about storage and if you don’t have enough storage you need guaranteed on demand generation or people start to die.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews