News location:

Sunday, April 20, 2025 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Productivity slump worsens Australia’s deficit dilemma

With spending increasing due to challenges like an ageing population and tax receipts falling due to sluggish economic growth, Australia is not expected to be back in surplus until 2034/35.

By Jacob Shteyman in Canberra

Australian productivity is in the doldrums, complicating matters for a government struggling to grow its way out of a debt problem.

Labour productivity – which measures how much output is produced per hour worked – fell 0.8 per cent in the 12 months to September, the Productivity Commission revealed on Wednesday.

The short-lived productivity bubble caused by COVID-19 disruption has now burst, with levels back to where they were during the stagnant 2015-2019 period, the commission’s deputy chair Alex Robson said.

“The data underscores the point that reinvigorating productivity is a national priority,” he said.

Productivity is key to the health of the economy.

“Even small changes that make the economy more dynamic and efficient can deliver big economic dividends and add up to major improvements in real wages and living standards over time,” Dr Robson said.

Getting productivity moving again will be essential if the Australian government is to find a way to pay for growing structural deficits.

With spending increasing due to structural challenges like an ageing population and tax receipts falling due to sluggish economic growth, Australia is not expected to be back in surplus until 2034/35, the mid-year economic and fiscal outlook revealed on Wednesday.

The government’s finances have long been in decline but nothing is being done to reverse it, EY chief economist Cherelle Murphy warned.

“The government has failed to deliver a path to lift the prosperity of the Australian people and grow its way out of the debt burden,” she said.

“We need a plan to jump start our productivity through major reforms – including, importantly, to our tax system, trade and education – or we will face higher taxes and cuts to essential services in the future.”

Neither side of Australian politics had been willing to have an “adult conversation” with the Australian people about how to pay for the additional spending, independent economist Saul Eslake said.

One way of reducing spending would be to axe the ‘No Worse Off’ GST deal with Western Australia, which will make the federal budget $21.1 billion worse off over the four years to 2027/28.

Beyond that, politically palatable spending cuts are much harder to find, Mr Eslake said.

Finance Minister Katy Gallagher said Labor had made strides in reducing spending growth, especially through NDIS and aged care reforms, as well as banking previous upward revenue revisions to pay off debt and reduce interest payments.

“I don’t think you would have found a government that’s done more to try and address those big structural spends,” she told ABC Radio National on Thursday morning.

Unlike the previous coalition government, which did not find any expenditure savings in its last budget, Senator Gallagher touted the $92 billion in savings and reprioritised spending Labor had found since the election.

Without structural change, increased spending will have to be paid for by larger deficits and ever-increasing personal income taxes.

“In both cases, the burden is falling disproportionately on younger generations,” Mr Eslake said.

Shadow treasurer Angus Taylor promised to reimpose fiscal guardrails, limiting taxation to 23.9 per cent of GDP, if elected.

He criticised the government for overseeing growth in public servant numbers, vowing to cut growth in the bureaucracy.

Australia’s non-market sector, which is mainly made up of government services such as health care, has grown faster than the private sector but underperformed on productivity.

But it’s not all doom and gloom, said the Productivity Commission’s Dr Robson.

Australia’s strong jobs market is a notable success story, with many more workers employed and participating in the workforce than before the pandemic.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Australian Associated Press

Australian Associated Press

Share this

One Response to Productivity slump worsens Australia’s deficit dilemma

David says: 20 December 2024 at 3:26 pm

Ah, the old productivity myth based which seems to be based on workers are slackers and don’t work at full capacity. Or is it, for every job there is always some level of automation that will make each worker do more (without actually making another worker redundant). Is this linear or is there some asymptote where we cannot just expect it to improve without losing jobs? Let’s not let that get in the way of a good headline, of course we can all do more for less.

Funny how we can talk about productivity of workers but ignore productivity of other things such as money or housing.

In the case of money, we want everybody to be building towards their retirement which includes spending money and housing. Every cent spent during their working lives they get nothing back for their future is lost productivity. The big one here is rent. They get nothing for rent and run the real risk on ending up relying on the tax payer for public housing once they retire. Let’s improve productivity by prioritizing owner occupiers over property investors and put that rent money towards their retirement housing. Why is the government directing any money into property investors when they should be increasing it’s productivity and directing it into assisting home ownership?

Next is housing, how many houses have we got lying vacant or partially used in a housing crisis? No excuses for any unoccupied/partially used houses if the owner also owners another home. Convert those homes in owner occupiers’ and improve the productivity of the houses we’ve already built.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews