News location:

Wednesday, February 5, 2025 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Chief scientist lights fuse on nuclear energy debate

Prof Tony Haymet will take over from Dr Cathy Foley as Australia’s chief scientist. (Alan Porritt/AAP PHOTOS)

By Andrew Brown in Canberra

Australia’s top scientist faces a showdown with a future coalition government, casting doubt on the opposition’s plan to establish nuclear energy.

Oceanography professor and former CSIRO chief Tony Haymet has been named new Australian chief scientist, to provide independent advice and research to the federal government.

Prof Haymet, a former director of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography and chief of marine research at the CSIRO, said the appointment was a “job of a lifetime”.

But the chief scientist is concerned about a coalition proposal to establish seven nuclear power plants in Australia in the next decade using small modular reactors.

Prof Haymet said he backed a CSIRO report, which said the proposal did not provide the most effective solution for low-emissions energy, despite Opposition Leader Peter Dutton criticising the findings.

“I was quoted as saying I’d like to go and see (a small modular reactor). The fact that I can’t means they don’t exist yet,” he said in Canberra on Tuesday.

“You may not be surprised to hear that I think the CSIRO report is a very fine piece of work. I don’t know of any mistakes in it.

“The evidence (on small modular reactors) is not looking positive in the short term.”

Prof Haymet said the nuclear industry needed to demonstrate it could build a reactor on time and ensure it operated safely.

“The nuclear industry has accepted the fact that they have to rebuild their social license to operate,” he said.

Prof Haymet in 2022 shared an article on social media which labelled nuclear energy as slow, expensive and would not help meet emissions reduction targets.But Mr Dutton said he was not concerned by the chief scientist’s comments, noting other western countries had the energy source.

“The chief scientists in the United States, the United Kingdom, in Canada, what do they know? What do the ministers there know that you know or don’t know that (Energy Minister) Chris Bowen somehow has worked out,” he said in Western Australia.

“It just doesn’t make sense.”

The incoming chief scientist would be “exceptional” in the role, Science Minister Ed Husic said.

“He’ll hit the ground running and do a terrific job championing scientists and researchers in this nation and championing their work,” he said.

Prof Haymet will take over as Australia’s chief scientist from Cathy Foley, who finished in December.

He is the 10th person to be named as chief scientist and will serve a three-year term.

The Australian Academy of Science’s president Chennupati Jagadish congratulated Prof Haymet’s appointment.

“Professor Haymet has made outstanding contributions to Australian and international science, its application and philanthropy,” Professor Jagadish said.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Australian Associated Press

Australian Associated Press

Share this

One Response to Chief scientist lights fuse on nuclear energy debate

David says: 28 January 2025 at 6:16 pm

Clever captains pick leading into an election. Pick someone who backs the Labor policies and thinks they have enough straw to try and plug the holes in the CSIRO buckets. Many people would also like to see a storage solution for renewable energy that is cost effective/practical etc etc and guarantees seasonal power without having to be backed by greenhouse gas emitting gas power stations. The world has been working on that for longer than SMRs, ever since rechargeable batteries became a thing. The advent of the mobile phone industry saw unbelievable investment into battery technology on all scales. Small batteries for your phones, large batteries to run the network in disasters when the grid goes down. Also, we have a form of SMRs, nuclear submarines. It’s a question of optimizing the design.

I would prefer not to have to use nuclear power but I also want some honesty. Stating a timeline for SMRs and omitting a similar timeline for renewable storage, which has been being worked on just as long and no better chance of success, is not really that honest.

No wonder we cannot roll any advanced technology out if that’s the best we can do.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews