News location:

Thursday, March 27, 2025 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Pocock labels energy bill relief a ‘band-aid solution’

Independent Senator David Pocock speaks to the media during a press conference at Parliament House. Photo: Lukas Coch/AAP

By Tess Ikonomou in Canberra

Australia is being urged to divert uncontracted gas back to the domestic market to provide households with long-lasting energy bill relief.

Independent senators David Pocock and Jacqui Lambie have lashed Labor’s $150 energy rebates for households as a “band-aid solution”.

They want the federal government to stop exporting so much gas overseas, so households and businesses have access first.

Senator Pocock said Australia didn’t have a gas supply shortage, but a gas export problem with 80 per cent being sent abroad.

“This is a problem that can be solved,” he said on Monday.

“What we haven’t seen is the political will from the major parties who actually say Australians should benefit from Australian gas first before we export.”

Senator Lambie said the nation needed a gas reserve policy of 15 per cent.

“This is not about digging up more gas. This is not about ‘drill, baby drill’. This is about prioritising where our gas goes,” she said.

“The first thing you (government) could be… doing this week, is putting through a gas reserve policy for this country to make energy prices reduced.

“Stop this rubbish of not doing means testing and giving people like me $150 off my electricity bill.”

The Australian Energy Market Operator has tempered warnings about shortfalls as early as this year.

But long-term risks to gas supply remained serious, it said in its latest outlook for the east coast gas market.

Analysis from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis found the projected shortfall in domestic gas markets could be met by diverting uncontracted gas.

Australia is Japan’s single-largest provider of energy.

Nationals leader David Littleproud said gas was the only short-term way to put downward pressure on energy prices.

“It’s the only input that you can ramp up, supply quickly,” he told Sky News.

Mark Ogge, from the Australia Institute, said consecutive governments had given away the nation’s gas “for free” to multinationals.

“Big gas are taking the piss, our governments are letting them, and ordinary Australians are paying the price,” he said.

Australian Council of Social Service chief executive Cassandra Goldie said leaders needed to pull every lever to both bring down energy prices and transition to a clean economy.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

3 Responses to Pocock labels energy bill relief a ‘band-aid solution’

David says: 24 March 2025 at 2:07 pm

Oh wow “Australia is being urged to divert uncontracted gas back to the domestic market to provide households with long-lasting energy bill relief.”. Why does it take some independents to point out what our useless politic analysts have failed to highlight. The elephant in the room is “long-term”. i.e Labor doesn’t have a zero emissions solution that is anywhere near affordable in the long term. All of you who have argued against the Nuclear option because its over priced (plus overlooked it’s actually zero emission), you are just pathetic. Pity you couldn’t have put your effort into finding a viable non-nuclear zero emission solution, let alone one which is affordable.

Reply
Jim says: 25 March 2025 at 8:54 am

So David, your whining that people are saying Nuclear is over priced – i.e. taking into account costs, but on the other hand whining that people aren’t considering costs. They either are or they aren’t.

Every reputable report shows that nuclear will never be cost competitive in this country, and will require huge subsidies and/or excessively high prices in the electricity market to even get close to breaking even. That is not in doubt, unless you do shonky analysis like the absolute Z grade rot put out by Frontier. So unless you want to whine forever in a day about sky high electricity prices (you think its bad now), then nuclear is never going to be an answer. It isn’t affordable in the short term, and it sure as ain’t affordable over the longer term.

Reply
David says: 25 March 2025 at 9:56 am

What reputable reports? How is it that any similar country has realized that to get to zero emissions you actually need a zero emissions solution that has a primary backup component that is environmentally insular. Nuclear is ugly but it does supply this. Labor’s plan doesn’t and is reliant on burning gas for the long term, as highlighted in the above article, which produces some of the worst greenhouse gases. It will also be very expensive if there aren’t significant changes, also highlighted in the above article. So Labor is hoping people are dumb enough not to realize they are reliant on gas, their solution isn’t zero emission and it will be very expensive. They can’t fight the nuclear option on zero emissions or reliability, we already have a nuclear reactor in the country, so their only option they seem to have is to make it look expensive and a long way away hoping people aren’t smart enough to look at the rest of the world and ask, why can they do it?

We aren’t arguing over renewables, all solutions will have a component of that. We are arguing about zero emission and the seasonal surety of supply for our main infrastructure (think hospitals). We’re rolling out renewables all over the place and nothing is getting cheaper, as yourself why.

I wont waste time commenting on the rest of your comments as without an understanding of what I just mentioned I’m not surprised you made them. However, as food for thought think about the impact of having such major privatized players in our energy market is having and just how independent you think all the comments and reports are. The big threat nuclear has to them is it will potentially undermine their market dominance as it should be government owner and operated. Ask yourself why every house with solar panels doesn’t have batteries so they can operate off the grid removing the impact they are having on infrastructure and maximizing potential of renewables. If house batteries were priced like electric car batteries it would be a no brainer and definitely not cost prohibitive.

I don’t want nuclear but I do want zero emissions and honesty.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews