News location:

Friday, April 18, 2025 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Leave it to us: teachers dismiss maths crisis claims

Australian schools have a numeracy crisis, with a third of students failing to meet basic standards. (Joel Carrett/AAP PHOTOS)

By Alex Mitchell

Teachers are pushing back on suggestions they’re to blame for Australia’s low maths proficiency, after a study questioned “faddish” classroom methods.

A Grattan Institute study found not only were students struggling with maths but many teachers lacked confidence to teach it even at a year six level.

But the teachers’ union said the institute did not understand the reality of classrooms around the nation.

Grattan called for a number of government commitments, including a long-term goal of 90 per cent numeracy proficiency on NAPLAN testing, clearer guidance to schools on teaching methods and more professional development for teachers.

The union said some of the proposals – including “beefing up school and principal reviews” and setting up an independent oversight body to drive the curriculum – were not the answer.

Instead, the focus for all curriculum areas should be on ensuring high-quality teacher education and ongoing professional development, addressing escalating workloads and fully funding public schools.

“It’s time for the Grattan Institute to leave teaching to the highly qualified and trained teaching profession,”  Australian Education Union federal president Correna Haythorpe said.

Just 13 per cent of Australian year four students excelled on a 2023 international maths test, compared with 22 per cent in England, 16 per cent in Ireland and 32 per cent in Japan.

At year eight level, just 11 per cent of Australians excelled.

Grattan Institute education program director Jordana Hunter said Australia had deprioritised maths for decades.

“Governments have also been too slow to rule out faddish but unproven maths teaching methods,” she said.

“To turn rhetoric into reality, governments need to take seriously the evidence base on how humans, including children, learn maths most effectively.”

The institute’s survey found some teachers lacked the confidence to teach year six maths, while many were concerned about their colleagues’ ability to teach the subject.

Dr Hunter said a 10-year “maths guarantee strategy” would only cost about $67 per primary school student a year.

La Trobe University education expert Joanna Barbousas said the study made it clear action was needed to halt the “numeracy crisis”.

“The lifetime impact for students who fall behind on these core skills is substantial,  affecting long-term employment, health and social outcomes and perpetuating cycles of disadvantage,” she said.

“Teachers are telling us they feel unprepared for the classroom … when half of our 15-year-olds fail to achieve national standards in maths, it’s not the students who are failing, it’s our approach to education.”

Education Minister Jason Clare pointed to the government’s funding agreements with states and said the money was tied to practical reforms, including an early years numeracy check.

“We’re also improving teacher training at university to make sure teaching students are taught the fundamentals about how to teach children to read and write and do maths and how to manage disruptive classrooms,” he said.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

2 Responses to Leave it to us: teachers dismiss maths crisis claims

KeithT says: 14 April 2025 at 12:10 pm

This is not “mathematics”. It is basic numeracy and arithmetic.
Referring to it as mathematics makes it appear deeper and much more sophisticated and advanced than it is.

Reply
David says: 15 April 2025 at 5:05 pm

I think the union’s comment of “It’s time for the Grattan Institute to leave teaching to the highly qualified and trained teaching profession,” sums it all up. What was being questioned was whether the teaching staff were actually highly trained and qualified teaching professionals. I don’t think anyone would have a problem leaving it to highly qualified and trained teaching professionals if they were confident that is who they were leaving it to. Which also highlights the problem the unions often get themselves into, the most vocal in the movement are often the most unqualified and least trained and hide behind the power of numbers. Nothing like a union to protect mediocracy until it gets so bad you cannot deny there’s a problem. When it becomes obvious the problem/answer is always funding. The definition is lunacy is keep doing the same thing and expect the results to be different. Or, no point throwing good money after bad without changing something. The problem may well not be the teaching, it could be a curriculum focused on teaching maths as though it was a set of secret handshake tricks to be memorized as opposed to a scientific tool that in many areas we all naturally do without realizing it. Whatever the problem is, it’s not going to be fixed by anyone who suggests all is ok and we just need more money.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews