News location:

Friday, November 29, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Grinding rate rises hit struggling Queanbeyan families

Queanbeyan resident Sian Rinaldi… “People are already struggling – ours is a young family trying to pay a mortgage – and these additional costs are making it so much harder.”

A second rate rise by the Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council (QPRC) will see a 39 per cent increase to ratepayers in just over a year with additional water and sewerage charges also going up.

In place from Monday, July 1, the latest levy of 18 per cent comes after a Special Rate Variation (SRV) of a total of 64 per cent over three years was approved by a council majority of eight councillors to three in February, 2023.

Applications for SRV’s are required to be submitted to the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART) when local councils seek to increase general rates beyond the state-government determined rate peg.

Also taking effect from July 1, other charges set to increase in the local government area include 15.6 per cent for water supply, 6.5 per cent for the annual sewer charge, a further 4.5 per cent for “other water and sewer charges” and waste charges rising an additional 4 per cent.

Mark Schweikert, previously a Liberal councillor on the Palerang Council and elected to the newly formed QPRC in 2016 until 2021, says the current rises don’t take into account cost-of-living pressures.

“While a rate rise was necessary, 64 per cent – one of the highest in NSW – was a bit over the top,” he said.

“The fact they even suggested 96 per cent at one stage shows a total disconnect between the controlling Labor/Greens block and their community.”

Mr Schweikert acknowledged that the previous council had given consideration to a SRV.

“We considered a recommendation of a six per cent SRV per year over three years.”

“Our resolution was that a range of matters be looked at first including further efficiency savings, sale of non-strategic properties, grant funding and the potential for the transfer of emergency services assets back to the state government.”

“It’s disappointing a majority of this council supported it as its first course of action reaching into ratepayers’ pockets rather than its own.”

Queanbeyan resident Sian Rinaldi says she’s considering a tilt for council because of decisions such as the “excessive” rate rises.

“People are already struggling – ours is a young family trying to pay a mortgage – and these additional costs are making it so much harder.”

“What’s council doing to assist? We need strong and sustainable financial management and because of decision-making like this, I’m giving serious consideration to running for council.” 

QPRC has stated that the just adopted 2024/25 operational plan has a focus on “achieving a break-even operating result and having enough cash to continue to provide services and maintain infrastructure at levels that are acceptable to the community.”

The capital works program includes “progressing the new Bungendore Swimming Pool design” and construction of a second water reservoir for Jerrabomberra.

It also sees an increase of $1.2 million for road maintenance and a further $2.1million “allocated to road renewal projects” as well as an additional $500,000 to “improve the Development Assessment process”.

 

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

3 Responses to Grinding rate rises hit struggling Queanbeyan families

Neil, of Queanbeyan says: 2 July 2024 at 5:13 pm

The rate rises are exhorbitant, and we can certainly vote these Labor/Greens people out at the next council elections (which is technically possible but won’t happen in the ACT), but at least the rates are paying for services and not for a tram that costs billions and is of little use to many.

Reply
Katrina Willis, Greens Councillor, QPRC, and canddiate for 2024 local governmetn elections says: 10 July 2024 at 12:21 am

Is Ms Rinaldi standing for election in September? She was previously on Cr Biscotti’s ticket. Odd that she’s the only struggling resident you could find to interview for this news report. Councillors who voted against the budget on 26 June (including additional funding for rural roads for which they campaigned) didn’t provide an alternative option. If people would like to see less steep rate rises, they would do best to lobby the federal and state governments to stop cost shifting to local government and restore the proportion of national taxation revenue to councils. Had it remained at the former 1 per cent (instead of the current 0.56%), QPRC would have had an additional $6M in annual income. And just to note, the council on which Mr Schweikert served decided in October 21, two months before the council election, to let the next council sort out the structural deficit it hadn’t managed to address. People are struggling to pay their bills but the council cannot provide basic services and facilities for the widely-dispersed population of Queanbeyan-Palerang from thin air. Council is working to reduce its costs, streamline processes and find more savings. People are under pressure in large part because of the impact of 35 years of neoliberal economic policy (increased job insecurity, stagnant wages, ineffective price regulation, privatisation, rising out-of-pocket costs for basic services) on the vast majority of residents and these impacts will not be easily reversed by the old political parties.

Reply
Jason says: 29 September 2024 at 4:13 pm

To Katrina Willis, Greens Councillor, QPRC

You are paid to lobby for us! Not the other way around, it is you and the General Managers job to go to your local representatives Steve Whan and also lobby Kristy McBain to encourage that change of funds modelling and allocation.

The very fact you put it back on local residents by saying “ If people would like to see less steep rate rises, they would do best to lobby the federal and state governments to stop cost shifting to local government and restore the proportion of national taxation revenue to councils” shows how detached you actually are with your community.

It is your job! to do that, that’s why you get paid to represent us!?

Change only works when you perform you duties not pass the buck onto others.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews