News location:

Canberra Today 19°/22° | Monday, January 24, 2022 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Sad Manuka shows pop-ups in search of design

Franklin Street, Manuka… It was an ugly look. It looked as if the street had been closed for construction. The dominant barriers ensured any patrons would feel enclosed. Photo: Paul Costigan

“The ACT government used to be reasonably good at using designers. Not anymore. The results today are usually very amateurish and quickly removed,” writes “Canberra Matters columnist PAUL COSTIGAN. 

THE south side of Franklin Street, Manuka, was shut off during November for several clusters of seats and tables on fake grass. It was apparently another of this government’s pop-up experiments. 

Paul Costigan.

Taking over the parking spaces and part of urban streets is an idea that has been around for several decades. The successful version kicked off in San Francisco in 2005 and has since spread across the world.

PARK(ing) Day occurs in mid-September with design studios and other collectives having fun. Spaces are claimed, sometimes as long as the meter is fed.

It can involve design innovations and wonderful crazy ideas. Other groups use secondhand household furniture as well as some things especially constructed on site. The events work when people are attracted to sit around and enjoy themselves or even sit quietly and enjoy the novelty of the space.

What happened in Manuka was a bit sad. Someone obviously had heard about the idea of taking back part of the street for people to enjoy. But they missed the point. There was nothing fun about the scattered placement of the standard ACT government pop-up seats, tables and obligatory planters. 

This experiment failed because it did not involve design or the expertise of creating aesthetically attractive urban spaces for people.

To hammer home how badly this was done, the street was surrounded with large orange construction barriers. It was an ugly look. It looked as if the street had been closed for construction. These dominant barriers ensured any patrons would feel enclosed as if they were in danger from evil things beyond those orange walls.

The ACT government is not doing well when it comes to design of our public spaces. The Tuggeranong revamp along Anketell Street is exactly what Liberal MLA Mark Parton said it was. It was the largest speed bump in the world with a few bits of street furniture and underwhelming decorations. It is an expensive and boring addition to Tuggeranong.

Meanwhile, over in Weston the locals had campaigned for an upgrade of the small park on Brierly Street and Trenerry Square. The community council gathered the ideas and submitted them to the ACT government.

What appeared in March, 2018, was nothing like what had been requested. Lots of hard surfaces and very little shade as requested. This expensive and unpopular design work is about to be undone with new consultations underway to identify what the locals want. Maybe someone in government should re-read the first submissions from the community council and design according to that very clear brief.

The inner north has been littered with the City Renewal Authority’s expensive pop-up activities. After millions of dollars, not much has survived. Some faded paint here and there, some twisted version of a park outside the swimming pool and a scattering of chairs and potted plants throughout the shopping centre. There will be no design awards handed out for this useless clutter.

And to return to the concepts behind claiming back the streets. Good design can deliver, and has delivered, some fabulous new spaces. The investment in having experienced and talented designers influence the outcomes is definitely worth it. 

The ACT government used to be reasonably good at using designers. Not anymore. The results today are usually very amateurish and quickly removed.

The closure and re-use of streets is to be encouraged. Such initiatives will have a divided response – that’s guaranteed. Some want more. Others will oppose it as it disadvantages the car driver. To make such stuff happen requires an experienced design leader. This is something this government lacks and it shows in what is being thrown up around the city.

What happened at Manuka was a missed opportunity. A new concept should be explored with experienced landscape architects and professional placemakers. If the government planners could do their job and get onside with the Liangis development and get that building done, something very good could come of a revamp of Franklin Street. And maybe a few other streets around the city.

Paul Costigan is an independent commentator and consultant on the visual arts, photography, urban design, environmental issues and everyday matters.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Paul Costigan

Paul Costigan

Share this

3 Responses to Sad Manuka shows pop-ups in search of design

Ian Pearson says: December 22, 2021 at 8:45 am

Paul, I think your criticisms miss the mark. This was simply a ‘proof of concept’ trial and the ‘designs’ had nothing to do with the ACT Government. They were simply the best efforts by the cafes that saw it worth their while to participate in a trial that was far too short and poorly timed for meaningful conclusions to be drawn from it. For example, because the trial was so short, the owners of Public didn’t see it being worth going to the expense of installing the necessary seating and other arrangements. A longer trial, conducted during a time of better weather may produce more conclusive results, but for my part, as a mere patron of Manuka hospitality establishments, I thought the trial was a useful indicator of what might be. Once there is broad agreement that such an arrangement is part of Manuka’s future (and I hope that it is!) the proper design work can commence.

colin walters says: December 22, 2021 at 9:02 am

While I don’t dissent from these general comments, I beg to differ about the improvements to City Walk and Gareema Place, where the new flower beds and seating, together with the lunch time concerts, have greatly enlivened what had become a dreary landscape. This and the successful Bunda St shared zone should be a model for what could be achieved at Manuka, and elsewhere in the city.


Leave a Reply

Related Posts


How fairly has Australia advanced?

The contention around Australia Day grows with each passing year and now, says NICK OVERALL, more than ever, it’s important to ask the question, what is the history of Australia Day and does it have a future?

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews