News location:

Monday, December 23, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Councillors vote themselves a 22 per cent pay rise

Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council (QPRC) councillors.

ONE of NSW’s most inexperienced councils have given themselves a 22 per cent pay rise.

The majority of Queanbeyan-Palerang councillors, elected at the December poll, voted to bump up their pay packets on Wednesday (June 9) to the maximum allowed under the new council pay structure – which saw Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council (QPRC) designated in the Regional Centre category of council.

From July, councillors will now make $25,310 a year, a 22 per cent increase, while the mayor’s total fee will increase by 33 per cent to $87,820.

This comes as the council faces a $10 million deficit in its general fund, and Queanbeyan residents soon to see an increase in their rates.

The vote to increase wages carried seven to four, with one councillor questioning the logic of an increased spend on salaries.

Of the 11 councillors, eight were new to the regional council. First-time councillor Mareeta Grundy, who voted against the increase, said money would be better spent repairing roads and fixing footpaths.

“We are talking about almost $70,000 that could be spent on bus shelters, road signs, and grading unsealed roads that are in a total mess at the moment and there’s no money to fund extra grading,” Cr Grundy said.

“There’s also areas that don’t have footpaths where elderly people are walking on the side of the road, and they can’t use their walkers because there’s no footpath.”

Cr Grundy said it’s a conflict of interest for councillors to be voting on the remuneration for their duties.

“We should not be voting to give ourselves a pay rise…we shouldn’t be making decisions that directly benefit us,” Cr Grundy said.

With only three of the 11 councillors having previous council experience, Cr Grundy wonders whether new councillors deserve a pay increase so soon after being elected.

“I find it somewhat absurd that we not only give ourselves a pay rise, but a substantial pay rise to the top of what is possible within the legislation, when the majority of councillors have no experience,” Cr Grundy said.

“It’s like immediately rewarding someone who has come to the job without any experience.”

Mayor Kenrick Winchester, who voted in favour of the pay rise, told Wednesday’s council meeting that a pay increase would attract better candidates to council.

“People of younger generations are not putting their hands up for these roles because they can’t afford to do it,” Mayor Winchester said.

“People who are putting their hand up to be Mayor are mostly semi-retired or retired because professional working people can’t afford to take time off or quit their job to do this role for the amount that we pay.”

 

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Belinda Strahorn

Belinda Strahorn

Share this

4 Responses to Councillors vote themselves a 22 per cent pay rise

Neil, of Queanbeyan says: 11 June 2022 at 12:30 pm

Good on you Mareeta Grundy. I’d like to know who the other three are who are not just in it for the money. Winchester says the “pay increase would attract better candidates to council”. Firstly, that is a non sequitur. I want people who want to do the right thing for Queanbeyan and the region, not top up their take-home pay. Secondly, he is almost right – the pay increase will encourage me (and hopefully others) to vote for different people for the council.

Reply
Helen Ferguson says: 12 June 2022 at 12:25 pm

Michele Biscotti, Jacqueline Tournouth, Louise Burton voted against a Councillor remuneration increase.

Reply
Matthew Shea says: 13 June 2022 at 6:53 pm

It’s not a full time job. I think it is crazy that they have done this. I think they just ensured they will face some competition at the next election.

Reply
Jason says: 29 September 2024 at 4:33 pm

I find it funny that Kendrick Winchester say’s “ it would attract better candidates to council”, I guess we don’t need this lot then as it should attract better people then the one’s currently on the council.

The fact that a new building, Special Rate variation of 64 per cent over 3 years and a 22 percent pay rise all seems like an opportunistic money grabbing from society if you ask me.

Stating that QPRC “deserves a building like this” when it doesn’t even fit in with the other architecture in the area is laughable.

I feel this council are just making excuses, you want more money then you (The QPRC) are being paid by us! (The Rate Payers) for you to represent us.

Maybe QPRC could actually do its job and approach Steve Whan and Kristy McBain to lobby for the extra money it needs rather then take the easy way out and take from the pockets of QPRC residents who are already struggling during the cost of living crisis!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews