News location:

Monday, November 11, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Passionate Peter and the disconnected Greens

 

Peter Dombrovskis’ “Morning Mist, Rock Island Bend, Franklin River” (1980).

“Drive along Northbourne Avenue and the results of the ACT Greens’ approach to urban design and architecture are there to shock visitors coming down this gateway to the city,” writes “Canberra Matters” columnist PAUL COSTIGAN

A GREAT photograph can bring about a myriad of memories as well as pose more mundane questions such as why political movements fail. 

Paul Costigan.

These thoughts occurred while standing in front of Peter Dombrovskis’ photograph in the National Library’s documentary photography exhibition “Viewfinder: photography from the 1970s to now”. The photograph is “Morning Mist, Rock Island Bend, Franklin River” originally taken in 1980.

A wonderful image, besides being pleasurable to look at, can be part of change within society. This happened in the early ’80s with a campaign in the media and through posters by the Wilderness Society featuring this Dombrovskis photograph. 

The campaign set out to save Tasmania’s Franklin and Gordon Rivers threatened by the Tasmanian government’s love of hydro-electric development at all costs. It made no sense. It did not add up. It threatened things cherished by environmentally aware Tasmanians – and soon by people throughout Australia. 

That campaign, together with the use of this photograph, influenced the change of federal government in 1983. The new Labor government intervened to scrap the plans for the dam.

One of the legacies of those environmentalists was the establishment nationally of the Greens as a political force. Bob Brown was its first leader and besides his time in politics, he maintained a life as a photographer. 

There should be an obvious link between the commitments of those early campaigners and the 2022 ACT Greens politicians. Unfortunately, there is a clear disconnect between the passionate Peter Dombrovskis and the ACT Greens establishment.

The ACT Greens’ record is well accepted as being the enablers of questionable actions by the Greenslabor government across social heritage, cultural, health, environment and planning portfolios. They are settled into their prime job of keeping themselves in well-paid jobs. 

While their rhetoric contains elements of what should be a progressive environmental, social and urban planning agenda, the stark reality is the last decade’s suburbs with minimal climate preparedness and an agenda that has seen monies taken from social and housing portfolios to pay for the developer-driven tram corridors.

Residents’ campaigns to save Canberra’s heritage, biodiversity, greenery and its quality of life are consistently thwarted by the ACT Greens’ desire to do as little as possible to halt inappropriate and health-threatening developments. 

Their hands-off approach to urban planning makes no sense. Their ideologically driven desire for inappropriate suburban developments along the proposed southern tram does not add up. 

This southern Barr-tram has been shown to be economic madness and absurd. The ACT Greens have morphed into being the hardline establishment that now threatens things cherished by environmentally aware and urban design loving Canberrans. They have inherited the ways of the ’80s Tasmanian government that was hell bent on doing stupid stuff as their core business.

When assessed nationally, the ACT residents register in statistics as having the highest participation rate in cultural activities – at least 13 per cent higher than the national average. 

This high level of cultural and artistic interest should be reflected in those representing the people of this city. No matter how you look at the ACT Greens, they fail as a political body that places any priority on aesthetics. Drive along Northbourne Avenue and the results of their approach to urban design and architecture are there to shock visitors coming down this gateway to the city.

The political, social and environmental movements that stood their ground against the absurdity of the ’80s Tasmanian government have a legacy that is reflected in Peter Dombrovskis’ “Rock Island Bend” photograph. It is worth standing in front of it and considering all manner of stuff.

Those ’80s environmentally committed individuals held fast against enormous pressures on things that mattered to their society. The 2022 ACT Greens consistently display only token commitments to working with the people of Canberra on issues that matter – such as planning and urban development. The ACT Greens politicians have not inherited those brave people’s ethics and commitments.

Peter Dombrovskis died alone in 1996 from a heart attack while photographing in his beloved wilderness. The photo mentioned here is one of 125 images on exhibition at the National Library until April 30. The ACT Greens have until October 2024 to get real or be moved aside by candidates who care for the city and its people. 

Paul Costigan is a commentator on cultural and urban matters. There are more of his columns at citynews.com.au

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Paul Costigan

Paul Costigan

Share this

3 Responses to Passionate Peter and the disconnected Greens

John says: 26 October 2022 at 3:47 pm

ACT Greens policy is chop-chop for the choo-choo down Northbourne.

Hundreds of trees can be destroyed for the tram, but if you need to get rid of a dangerous tree to protect your family and property then good luck with that.

Reply
Disillusioned says: 26 October 2022 at 5:59 pm

I live in one of the older and less desired suburbs. But I have a front, back and 2x side yards. I even have enough room for a gorgeous little courtyard that I like to call my fairy garden.

There is an enormous green space and connecting footpaths when I walk out of my back gate, and not 1 but 2 parks for children within close proximity of each other. And take another 50 steps and there is a bridge over the quiet road for the safety of children that leads to the Primary School with another 2x bonus ovals, basketball courts and playground.

The amount of people that have mentioned that 2, possibly even 3 townhouses could be fit onto this property and a packet of money is just sitting here, waiting to be made, makes me a little sad.

The Greens didn’t fight to keep our suburbs like this. So when I’m gone, that’s probably what will happen to the property.

We have so much land in Australia. And our City’s Architect had a vision that was so pure that they decided to put it into local law to protect it, so that we wouldn’t end up being tempted to sell what is or was the very heart of our beautiful Canberra. Open spaces. Large yards. Wide roads. Roundabouts are used where possible, instead of lights, no buildings to be over 6(?) stories, (If I remember correctly), and no billboards allowed to decrease vista-pollution. Our tallest buildings were one in Woden and the Woden Valley Hospital. That was it. I lived in the 1st “fancy” apartments to be built in Belconnen, called the Miramar Apartments. I was on the top floor, with a beautiful balcony. No elevator. It was only 3 stories high. We didn’t need it any higher.

Not everyone could live next to Belconnen Mall and the surrounding ammenities. And that was ok. Because we caught buses if we didn’t drive, and they ran great. Except on Sundays. Lol.

My point is that we have enough land for everyone to enjoy a home, without us having to make a concrete jungle out of entire suburbs so that people don’t have to catch the bus to the mall.
All so that developers can make quick cash on quick & dodgily built in most cases, apartments & homes.
But why would our government allow this? Why would they take away our green spaces to give these companies money?

First of all, they’re selling off government land to try and recoup some of the money that they spend while in office, to give the illusion that they can balance the books. If it’s because they say that we need more public housing, then why are there always new suburbs. Entire suburbs being built, yet the government waiting list for emergency housing can be up to 2 years.

Up to 5 years, if you need to move because of work, or your child has to go to a school that’s too far for them to walk/ride and sometimes the buses are full and just drive straight past them at the bus stops. So you have to drive them and use extra petrol money which is an enormous burden on an already tight budget. So up to 5 years is the wait for a house. Good luck.

But I thought we were building entire suburbs? Surely seeing as it’s government land, they would use as much as is needed to look after our most vulnerable? No. They’re doing it for pure profit. Smashing as many homes, townhouses and apartments as the developers can squash into one suburb, with schools and shops promised at a later date. As per usual.

So why would our politicians allow this? And why wouldn’t the Greens stop this?
Let’s face it, there’s money or campaign “donations” going to certain parties or Ministers to have allowed suburbs where you cannot even fit 2 cars on the road at the same time, side by side. There aren’t any front yards. There aren’t any side yards for that matter. Most free standing homes, have a garage right next to their neighbour’s garage, and you could barely fit a broom between them if you lost a frisbee down there. And there are minimal Government homes purchased/built by the government.

Why? Greed. At the cost of what? Our environment and the vulnerable people in our city that have nowhere to live.

I used to use the fire trails to walk to the shops and always spot some interesting wildlife. A koala, some Roos, with a Joey or 2 if I was lucky. A Kookaburra, blue tongues, always skinks. A snake, once in a while. And the streetlights in summer’s night, would be so covered in Christmas Beetles that they barely shone.

Now, I have to visit animal sanctuaries to see our own native wildlife that was a part of my home, my surroundings, growing up. We have allowed for our city to be ruined in under 1 generation.

I never even got to enjoy it all with my children.
They still don’t believe that it wasn’t rare for a Roo or 2 to be in one of the streets and word of mouth would reach us and we’d hop on our bikes. No, no pics. We didn’t know that it would be a rare occurrence when we grew up.

I don’t know if the laws expired or a particular government changed them. But I do know that I kept voting for the Greens blindly.

We didn’t have the internet to research as we do now. So I cannot believe that people still fall for their rubbish. They’d vote for a pay rise for ministers before they’d protect the beauty that our city used to hold. Maybe they don’t remember. Maybe they don’t care. Maybe they’ve lost their passion and have been institutionalised. Maybe they have an enormous yard and a house at the coast. It’s easy to lose your morals and fighting spirit when you can buy your own happiness. Our Earth, Our Beautiful City doesn’t seem to matter to them so much now.

I remember when The Greens just wanted to be taken seriously and for people to listen to them before it was too late.

Well a lot of us were listening and paying attention the entire time. You just lost your voice and your moral compass. You’ve diluted the Party name.

Just look around. Look at the carefully planted rows of trees next to busy streets that cannot be used by wildlife. Their roots breaking through the pavement in protest.

Just close your eyes.
Listen to the construction site noises in the background, making you money. You can’t hear the fauna, because you’ve strangled out most of the flora.

Your party name stands for naught.

Reply
Red says: 28 October 2022 at 5:23 pm

How can any of the older suburbs be “less desired” suburbs? You are happy there; unfortunately developers love them too and are waiting in the wings.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Opinion

Whoever dies with the most toys wins what?

"The poor guy ended up really satisfied and happy, making a great contribution to society, loving what he did and being deeply admired by his children, family and many, many friends. Tragic," writes Kindness columnist ANTONIO DI DIO.

Opinion

Surgical assembly line with the end in sight

"We’ve never had health insurance, and until the government blew the budget on that idiotic tram it'd worked well. Now it’s a mess and we're caught between insane premiums and waiting forever for "elective surgery," writes ROBERT MACKLIN. 

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews