News location:

Saturday, December 28, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Downer disconnect in thinking the best of Barr

More than a decade of promises has delivered almost nothing to Downer. Photo: Paul Costigan

“Barronomics is not about addressing inequality or looking after urban environments, biodiversity, greenery, birds, heritage and stuff that hinders developers,” writes “Canberra Matters” columnist PAUL COSTIGAN

COMMUNITY groups who have studied the Greenslabor planning reform plans and strategies know that the chief minister’s deregulation reforms will devastate the suburban characteristics that attract people to this city.

Paul Costigan.

Even though he is the chief minister, Andrew Barr continues as the real planning minister.

The city is now developed according to Barronomics. This is a skewed form of neoliberalism that says the development industries know what is best for this city and their investors must be able to exploit all suburban areas. 

Barronomics is not about addressing inequality or looking after urban environments, biodiversity, greenery, birds, heritage and stuff that hinders developers. 

Anyone who thinks that Barronomics is about having a priority on housing affordability, social housing, greenery, community facilities and social welfare programs has missed the point, is extremely naïve or simply trapped intellectually by the cult of  Barr’s and Shane Rattenbury’s Greenslabor.

Barr’s ideology is not about looking after pesky residents who cherish their homes, streets and neighbourhoods. It seems that, according to Barr, residents need to get real and stop fussing about the clearing of suburbs for more cookie-cutter monsters to be built and sold. 

As he said to Dickson residents a decade ago, residents who do not like what’s happening in their suburb need to move on and make way (for investors). Barronomics is about money.

Suburbs have their own characteristics and their own histories. The submission on the planning strategy by the Downer Community Association clearly makes the case that this government has misunderstood established suburbs. 

More than a decade of promises has delivered almost nothing to Downer. 

They make the evidence-based case that what is being proposed under the new District Strategies will not deliver on the issues concerning residents. 

The proposed District Strategies applies a set of vague development outcomes to all established suburbs without serious consideration of the nature of things on those suburban streets.

The seven-page submission can be found on the Downer Community Association website. It is a good submission written by people who have a set of values relating to the people in the suburbs and the aspects of the natural environment within their suburb. 

The submission writers have assumed that these values and aspirations are shared by the politicians and bureaucrats who called for this feedback. 

This is the serious disconnect. This error is shared among most of the feedback sent in as a response to the draft planning documents. The reality is that the city operates to an agenda set by Barr and those within his inner circle. That inner circle does not include residents who want to talk about things that matter to them.

How many times recently has Barr shown up at community meetings to discuss and empathise with their vision? Most likely zero. Contrast this with the frequent attendance by Barr and his planning bureaucrats to property and business forums where they are treated as special people. These events are about stroking egos and joint commitments to an ideology. This is something Canberra’s community groups do not offer. So why would the chief minister bother?

What should be considered when providing feedback is that Andrew Barr, the bureaucrats and their investor allies regard the suburb as land banks waiting for the most profitable redevelopments. 

The Greenslabor agenda is about the deregulation of development, investors and land banks. There is little concern if residents are directly or indirectly “encouraged” to leave their homes. 

Barr’s planning reforms, if implemented, are destined to be a success as they will deliver on his simplistic and devastating Barronomics principles.

Residents need to monitor who votes for these deregulation reforms and then remember those names at October 2024 ACT elections.

Paul Costigan is a commentator on cultural and urban matters. There are more of his columns at citynews.com.au

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Paul Costigan

Paul Costigan

Share this

3 Responses to Downer disconnect in thinking the best of Barr

Jim says: 12 April 2023 at 11:30 am

How many members does this Downer Community Association have? When I lived in the suburb for a decade it was between zero and about 5.

There is plenty of opportunity for considered urban infill in the suburb, given some big blocks in the areas away from the established nature elements that people are keen to protect (and understandably so).

Reply
Jacqui says: 12 April 2023 at 3:56 pm

Hello Jim. As Secretary of the DCA, I send emails to around 300 folk who are members of the DCA. They were all sent the DCA submission. Yes, perhaps only around 5 chose to comment.

Reply
Chris Emery says: 12 April 2023 at 4:07 pm

Changing our planning system, to one based on outcomes rather than current planning codes, will only open our communities to more developer-driven decisions, like the wholesale removal of street trees in Civic. When I asked why so many trees were removed from Cooyong Street about 12 years ago the answer was that a developer had asked. Seeing no development has proceeded, some speculator is making money by land-banking and ignoring canopy coverage requirements with government approval.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Opinion

Why Maconochie must be turning in his grave

"The unnecessary assault upon a defenceless, compliant prisoner, knowing there are three colleagues to back you up if the prisoner retaliates, should be called out as gutless bullying." HUGH SELBY reveals another shameful case at the AMC.

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews