News location:

Tuesday, November 19, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

One man’s war with bureaucracy in battle to breathe

Matthew Bolton with a photo of his late father… “I keep hearing the government say they care about the environment, but I’m not convinced.” Photo: Lily Pass

DAVID Bolton, 66, was admitted to Canberra Hospital with breathing difficulties, as he fought the ACT bureaucracy and an unsympathetic neighbour in Fraser on woodsmoke pollution.

David Bolton… in 2019 made 17 calls to Access Canberra to discuss air pollution.

“I had been warned that dealing with the ACT Environment Protection Authority was both arduous and futile,” he wrote in a five-page document to Clean Air Canberra, before passing away in February. “CityNews” does not infer that the neighbour’s choice of heating was responsible for Mr Bolton’s death. 

“My neighbours have both ducted gas and electric reverse-cycle systems, and a woodfire heater, which they previously used occasionally and responsibly.

“Over the years, their growing preference to use the woodfire heater became apparent.”

In 2019, David made 17 calls to Access Canberra, starting on April 23, to discuss the air pollution, reporting on significant odour and smoke.

In 2020, he called Access Canberra a further 15 times, chasing up on the countless reports he had submitted.

“He became so nervous about winter time, because the neighbours just kept putting whatever they wanted in the fireplace and burning it,” says David’s son, Matthew, 29.

“At one stage dad was really impacted, and he had to go to a hospital, so later on in 2020 I decided to move in and stay with him to try and help him through this situation.”

In 2022, Matthew discovered his dad had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

“It caused him to have airflow blockages and breathing-related problems,” says Matthew.

“Anything like dust or smoke would really impact him.

“Dad tried to go to the neighbours and voice his growing concerns, but he was told to get double-glazing on his windows, and they suggested he stay inside.”

In formal complaints reported by David, he says the environment protection officers on duty seemed competent and willing to manage the complaint initially, but after years of complaints from him and other neighbours, the issue was left unresolved.

Matthew says he knows the neighbour received multiple warnings, but nothing permanent was ever done. 

“He’s not listening, they gave out the first warning and then they closed the case, and then he just started burning again,” he says.

“Winter time was the scary part for him, for all of us, no one wants to see their parents suffering like he was, it’s not a good feeling.

“Dad got more and more frustrated with the process and going through everything, every time they closed a case, they didn’t reopen it. They didn’t look at the files or anything so they just end up doing the same thing over and over again.”

It’s too late now to solve the problem for David, but Matthew is desperate to see some changes so that no one else has to suffer through the same fight.

“I would love to actually see actions from those responsible, instead of continuing to give out warnings to actually look at the recorded history and do something,” he says.

“I keep hearing the government say they care about the environment, but at the moment I’m not convinced. They are very good at talking about it, but when actions are needed, they’re not very good at all.

“We can’t do anything about it. Dad has done what he was meant to do and nothing’s happened.

“So, I’m hoping in the future people will realise woodfires damage people’s health, and I’m hoping that in the end we can phase them out. That would be a good solution.”

In some final remarks to Clean Air Canberra, David said he was left feeling manipulated by Access Canberra, as though there was a lack of interest, with comments that suggested the exercise of reporting was pointless.

An ACT government spokesperson said the Environmental Protection Agency was aware of this matter and had engaged with the complainant.

“The EPA can only take regulatory action in such cases where there is sufficient evidence to establish that an environmental nuisance has occurred pursuant to the Environment Protection Act 1997,” the spokesperson says.

“In October 2021, the ACT Commissioner for Sustainability and the Environment provided a report on the ‘EPA response to excessive and potentially toxic smoke from neighbour’s wood heater’. The report’s findings identified several opportunities for improvements for Access Canberra and the EPA around the complaint investigation process, information provided to the complainant; and the continued use of wood-fired heaters in the ACT.

The EPA has reviewed its procedures for how wood-heater complaints are assessed.

“Access Canberra, through the Environment Protection Authority, responds to air pollution both proactively and reactively by focusing its resources where the risks of harm, unsafe practices or misconduct are greatest in the community in accordance with its Accountability Commitment framework.”

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Lily Pass

Lily Pass

Share this

12 Responses to One man’s war with bureaucracy in battle to breathe

S. Draw, K. Cab. says: 7 June 2023 at 10:12 pm

Does not infer, but seems to go to great lengths to suggest.

Not with you on this one CN. Less regulation and more education needed. Was the flue ever cleaned? Was coastal or inland hardwood used? Was rubbish truly burned in the heater? Was the heater brought to max burn temp before partially closing down the flue for long simmer? Was a prevailing wind and flue orientation a problem? Did the family run a HEPA(s) inside? Did the heater need servicing in other ways? Smoke doesn’t enter through glass, so how was it entering into the neighbours house?

Wood fire heaters are a small joy for many over winter. Granted, many don’t know how to use them correctly. This does not need to have a binary response. Both needs can be met.

The regulation-happy Barr gov should tread carefully on this one.

Reply
no2woodsmoke says: 8 June 2023 at 2:00 pm

I hope you sit back, read and fully digested this story while you comfort yourself by your ‘small joy’ over winter and spare a thought for other people with health issues like David suffered.

Reply
Sol says: 9 July 2024 at 3:55 pm

Hi ‘no2woodsmoke’, there is a Facebook Group forming to counter individuals, with no respect for their neighbours, emitting wood smoke in residential areas. Are you interested in receiving more info?

Reply
D. Katz says: 8 June 2023 at 3:07 pm

“Smoke doesn’t enter through glass,” but it does enter through cracks around the glass, under and around doors and vents, and in other ways. Wood smoke particles are microscopic—if you could seal up a house tight enough to keep out wood smoke particles, you’d also keep out oxygen. Researchers who’ve measured the infiltration of wood heater smoke outside into nearby homes have found that about 78% of the smoke level outside eventually winds up inside. Houses aren’t air-tight.

Nobody’s health and ability to breathe should be in the hands of someone else next door. The right to clean air must start to take precedence over the right to pollute.

Reply
Steve says: 8 June 2023 at 1:32 pm

Despite the comments above, there is simply no way to burn wood safely, as countless peer reviewed studies demonstrate. A minority of Canberrans produce the vast majority of our air pollution by using wood heaters and this, clearly, severely affects the health of the entire community, as study after study irrefutably shows. That this minority ‘likes’ it should not matter to policymakers – smokers liked smoking in public venues, but we put an end to that to protect public health. Wood smoke is vastly more carcinogenic than cigarette smoke, so wood heaters should also be prohibited in suburbs, where it’s impossible to keep smoke out of houses.

We live in a society and have a responsibility not to harm others unnecessarily. Those who burn wood despite having access to cleaner, healthier heating systems need to think about how their actions affect others. If they don’t care about their impact on those around them, they should bear in mind the recent finding by the NSW Government that wood heater users reduce their life expectancy by 12 years as a result of the pollution they expose themselves to. Unfortunately their neighbours who don’t burn wood are also affected.

Reply
Clive M. Stott says: 8 June 2023 at 2:32 pm

Definitely regulation is needed and must be enforced with stiff penalties.. People need to be made to stop burning stuff!
Education hasn’t worked, now it is time for action.
There is no safe level of air pollution according to the World Health Organization.
No one should be forced inside to put up with proxy air from a purifier blasting away so inconsiderate others on the outside can blow smoke in their face. It is impossible to totally seal a home. You would starve of oxygen if this was the case.
Think about the following:
“Every single disease that is non-communicable is impacted by air pollution.
It is not only involved in worsening diseases but in causing them, and new diseases that would not otherwise occur are happening because of air pollution” – Sir Stephen Holgate, National Clean Air Conference Nov. 20/21

Reply
Lori says: 8 June 2023 at 3:06 pm

S. Draw, K. Cab argue that “both needs can be met.”
Obviously, they can’t. This article states: “In 2019, David made 17 calls to Access Canberra, starting on April 23, to discuss the air pollution, reporting on significant odour and smoke. In 2020, he called Access Canberra a further 15 times, chasing up on the countless reports he had submitted.”

The particles in woodsmoke are so small, they enter our home even when all doors and windows are shut, just like the air we need to breathe. We can’t keep them out, except by making the house airtight, and then we’d die from lack of oxygen.

The vast majority of Canberrans would be happier and healthier if wood stoves could be phased out, e.g. by requiring them to be removed when houses are sold. This should be a problem for S. Draw, K. Cab because they’d be able to use their fire as long as they live in their house. After that, they have no need for it.

Hopefully most people will see that as the most sensible solution!

Reply
Clive M. Stott says: 8 June 2023 at 4:25 pm

I shudder every time I see indigenous people playing with fire and smoke.
It is acknowledged these people die 10 years younger, and more often attributable to diseases related to smoke.
All people must stop burning stuff.
“Particulate pollution is the most important contaminant in our air…We know that when levels go up people die.” – Joel Schwartz, Harvard School of Public Health, E Magazine, Sept./Oct. 2002.

Reply
Byron Woolcock says: 8 June 2023 at 8:41 pm

So good to see so much positive and well researched/informed reporting and comments.,That’s quite rare here in Canada and David’s story shares many similarities with mine and with millions worldwide. Thank you City News for sharing this vitally important story. At now 84 I’ve suffered COPD since the 1941 Nazi bombing if my UK birth village,,and then MCS diagnosed here in Ontario in 1974.
I’m still daily battling the unnecessary and invasive local smoke in my “golden years” of retirement.

Reply
S. Draw, K. Cab. says: 10 June 2023 at 7:10 pm

I have read your concerns. Taking an almighty position to an argument is NOT the way to go about changing someone else’s position. But I transcend myself; I have gone and read the science and see value in your arguments. Few would do that. I’ll add nobody provided links to good science to support their position.

Now, I’m curious to know if you’re as passionate about wearing good masks in indoor public settings and insist government mandated air filtration for public indoor spaces. Not a deflection, but a test. Because really, if you’re as informed on the risks smoke particulates then equally your knowledge on COVID should be on par. If you ignore one set of science and accept another, then my position on your position is unchanged, as I can’t take you seriously.

I.e. if you go about complaining about the Ill health affects of constant exposure to smoke from wood fire heaters and at the same time go about your lives carefree unmasked at indoor public spaces, at a friend’s or family house and invites to you home, then your position is untenable.

Just as you have not provided supporting evidence, neither will i.

Reply
Dafna says: 12 June 2023 at 2:55 am

Everyone living around wood burners suffer from smoke pollution, even those who don’t know it. Burning wood to heat homes will be illegal at some point, in the meantime all wood stove owners should know that it is not moral to burn wood. Even the most eco friendly wood stoves emits as many PM2.5 particles as six diesel trucks. There’s nothing romantic or cozy about death from pollution.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews