News location:

Sunday, April 13, 2025 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Prosecutor Drumgold sues over Lehrmann inquiry

Shane Drumgold has commenced legal action against the inquiry into Bruce Lehrmann’s prosecution. (Mick Tsikas/AAP PHOTOS)

By Paul Osborne in Canberra

The ACT’s outgoing top prosecutor is taking legal action against the inquiry into Bruce Lehrmann’s prosecution.

Shane Drumgold’s case is listed to be heard in the ACT Supreme Court on September 14, but no details were immediately available.

Mr Drumgold resigned as Director of Public Prosecutions in August after a board of inquiry, set up by the ACT government, made adverse findings against him.

The inquiry, chaired by former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff, examined accusations from police and prosecutors about each other’s conduct during Mr Lehrmann’s rape trial.

Brittany Higgins accused Mr Lehrmann, her former colleague, of raping her inside a ministerial office at Parliament House after a night out in 2019. Mr Lehrmann has always denied the allegation.

Mr Sofronoff made several serious findings of misconduct against Mr Drumgold, including that it had become clear he had lost objectivity and did not act with fairness and detachment as was required.

He also found Mr Drumgold knowingly lied to the ACT chief justice about the nature of a note relating to a meeting with broadcaster Lisa Wilkinson and a speech she later made when she won a Logie for her interview with Ms Higgins.

While Mr Drumgold accepted his conduct was less than perfect, he strongly disputed engaging in deliberate or underhanded conduct in the trial or that he was dishonest.

He has been contacted for comment.

ACT Attorney-General Shane Rattenbury noted the legal action in a speech to the Legislative Assembly on Tuesday.

“Mr Drumgold has now commenced legal proceedings in relation to the report,” he said.

Mr Rattenbury said the inquiry had been an “important step” in reviewing the criminal justice system, as well as identifying areas where agencies can work together to strengthen it.

“The government is committed to ongoing work being undertaken by multiple agencies to prevent and respond to sexual violence in our community,” he said.

“The outcomes of the board of inquiry, as well as the range of other measures implemented or under way, are designed to ensure that our system of justice is robust, fair and respects the rights of those involved.”

He also released a letter from NSW Director of Public Prosecutions Sally Dowling in which she points out a “significant factual inaccuracy” in the Sofronoff report.

Ms Dowling said a reference in the report to a NSW Supreme Court judge’s opinion in a particular case was in fact a paraphrase of the views of the Australian Federal Police from an article in “The Australian” newspaper.

In October 2022, Mr Lehrmann faced a criminal trial in the ACT Supreme Court but juror misconduct derailed the proceedings and the trial was discontinued.

Mr Drumgold ultimately dropped the prosecution against Mr Lehrmann, fearing the impact of a second trial on Ms Higgins’ mental health.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Australian Associated Press

Australian Associated Press

Share this

2 Responses to Prosecutor Drumgold sues over Lehrmann inquiry

Curious Canberran says: 29 August 2023 at 4:36 pm

Well there’s a turn of events.
I was anticipating charges to be laid against Mr. Drumgold.
Although I haven’t read the report itself, but when you see “..several serious findings of misconduct…”,
and “…knowingly lied to the ACT chief justice” as a basic summary, one tends to think there should be consequences for those actions.
The whole point of the inquiry was to get to the bottom of things, and I think it did just that.
Well apparently, Mr. Drumgold must feel he is a victim now and entitled to compensation?.

Reply
David says: 30 August 2023 at 7:01 am

When you choose to take up a role to serve the public and accept tax payer funding your job is to put the public first and make sure their money is well spent. Drumgold himself admitted he made mistakes and given his focus on his own personal ambition and objectives it is not to surprising. With the information that has become public since the aborted trial the jury issue may have been a saving grace for wider problems. Tax payers have already paid enough for the mistakes he has admitted to so it is time he actually puts the public first and finds something else to do with his time.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews