News location:

Thursday, December 12, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Reviewers under siege from ‘guidelines’

Valeria Arciniega Vidurrizaga as Maria with William Allington as Tony.  Photo: Janelle McMenamin

Reviewers attending the musical “West Side Story” were issued with a set of “guidelines”, which looked like an effort to pre-empt and restrict negative comment, a clear attempt at media manipulation, writes a furious “CityNews” arts editor HELEN MUSA

THE reviewing profession in Canberra appears to be under siege, with the latest attack coming in the form of extraordinary document given to selected reviewers attending “West Side Story” at Gungahlin Theatre on Friday night.

The lengthy document, a list of “guidelines” to reviewers, included the following: to refer to cast members using their “correct” pronouns; to avoid grouping the actors by ethnicity while at the same time referring to the actors’ country of origin or heritage; to spell names according to the program; to use the “respectful, gender, neutral term ‘Latinx’”; to comment on artistic choices as having been made by the “collective creative team” rather than individuals; and to avoid cultural bias.

Obviously under such conditions, “CityNews” and other reviewing outlets with professional journalists will not review “West Side Story”.

In a long career reviewing theatre, this is the first time I have ever seen such a missive. It comes in the context of the company’s experiment in casting the famous musical’s Puerto Rican characters with purely Latino artists from the Canberra community.

Given the danger that the experiment would not succeed, the “guidelines” looked like an effort to pre-empt and restrict negative comment, a clear attempt at media manipulation.

Canberra’s reviewers are not known for prejudiced, racist or ethnically-based comment, so the exercise seemed misjudged.

In what producer Richard Block later said had been an error caused by haste, the “guidelines” were handed to some reviewers and journalists, but not others. By Sunday afternoon Block dropped the restriction on reviews, but the reviewers, some of whom left because of the “guidelines”, will need to see the production again.

He said the “guidelines” had been printed and released at the request of the creative team.

This latest check on media freedom follows the Canberra Times’ recent decision to abandon commissioning specialist arts critics on the doubtful basis that Canberrans prefer previews to reviews.

Once again, the Canberra public loses out, not having access to a seasoned assessment which might help them decide whether or not to attend a production costing $37 to $45 for a seat.

Helen Musa OAM, is the arts editor of “CityNews” and founding convener of the Canberra Critics’ Circle.

 

 

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Helen Musa

Helen Musa

Share this

8 Responses to Reviewers under siege from ‘guidelines’

Jane Ahlquist says: 9 October 2023 at 10:10 am

I believe we must all pull together, as the arts are often up against it in this country: ghosted during budget commentary and given scant reviewing pages in the press. Artists, reviewers and arts bureaucrats all have a dignified role in promoting and elevating the arts in public consciousness. I do NOT agree with the giving of guidelines to such experienced reviewers.
Cheers

Reply
Olivia says: 9 October 2023 at 11:48 am

I don’t understand how providing people’s pronouns, countries of origin, and describing the preferred way to refer to the Latin community is ‘media manipulation’. It sounds like they were still welcoming reviews (good or bad) but merely ensuring that you refer to the artists how they choose to be referred to.

The arts have largely been a safe space for queer and gender non-conforming people, and we as patrons should respect that, as we respect and support the arts. Especially a production of West Side Story where it sounds like this cast is predominately made up of Latinx people.

Reply
Vince Gelder says: 9 October 2023 at 1:09 pm

Well, Latinx seems to be a description that most people have never heard of. Yes, Latino and Latina are the masculine and feminine forms of the word, while Latinos or Latino on its own is traditionally and still used as the plural to refer to groups of Latin American men and women together.

Furthermore, a 2020 report from the Pew Research Center i the US found that only 23 percent of U.S. adults who self-identify as Hispanic or Latino have heard of the term “Latinx,” and just 3 percent embrace the term for themselves. Those findings are consistent with the results of a 2021 Gallup poll, which reported that only 4 percent of respondents preferred the term “Latinx,” while 15 percent preferred “Latino” and 23 percent preferred “Hispanic.”

Reply
Brian says: 10 October 2023 at 9:47 am

So if I’m reading this correctly, you’re railing against a simple request to be respectful to the performers?

Stay classy.

Reply
Greg says: 11 October 2023 at 11:40 am

You obviously have not read the article correctly Brian. The document provided to the reviewers is yet another example of how the arts are being strangled from free speech, free choice and excessive guidelines to control the narrative. “to comment on artistic choices as having been made by the “collective creative team” rather than individuals; and to avoid cultural bias.” Please. Remember a time when actors were actors, directors were directors, and designers were designers. They were judged (individually) by their artistic and creative choices. I don’t know one reviewer that would reference an actor by anything but the name on the program, including preferred pronouns which now seem to predicate most names on documents such as programs.

Helen – keep calling out those that are working so hard to change the culture of what the arts once were.

Reply
RG says: 12 October 2023 at 8:47 am

At a time when many are still coming to terms with the appropriate use of pronouns and other preferred terms, I would say these are handy guidelines indeed for any reviewer who wants to be respectful to the various communities and individuals represented. Why take such offence? Without these guidelines would you have understood this in such detail?

Reply
Big Tim says: 18 October 2023 at 6:20 pm

Grow up Helen. It’s simply a matter of respecting the performers. If you can’t understand that, if you truly think respecting performers encroaches on your ability to review art, it might be time to hang up your reviewer hat.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews