News location:

Canberra Today 12°/14° | Thursday, May 2, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Tradie shortage dooms new-homes target

Australia is set to fall short on a bid to build 1.2 million homes in five years. (Bianca De Marchi/AAP PHOTOS)

By Luke Costin in Sydney

Australia is forecast to fall well short of a landmark national goal to build 1.2 million homes in five years as worker shortages and planning hurdles cut into house construction.

Building industry forecasts released on Tuesday estimated about 1.09 million new homes would be started in five years from July.

About half of the 112,000 shortfall is expected to come from NSW and South Australia, while only the ACT is predicted to meet its portion of the agreement.

The forecasts come after official data showed the production of high-density homes was in reverse, with commencements in 2022/23 falling to a 12-year low.

Master Builders Australia said falling inflation and interest rates would lead to a more favourable investment market and a building turnaround.

But government efforts to increase supply were being countered by supply-side constraints such as workforce shortages, industrial-relations changes and poor planning systems.

“Workforce shortages continue to be the biggest challenge for the industry across all sectors,” Master Builders Australia chief executive Denita Wawn said.

“At a federal level, the government’s priority should be growing the building and construction workforce.”

The nation’s largest residential builders’ association said maintaining government incentives for tradespeople to employ and retain apprentices was imperative.

“No stone should be left unturned to increase workforce capacity and improve skills shortages if we are to reach the goal of building 1.2 million homes,” Housing Industry Association managing director Jocelyn Martin said.

Skills Minister Brendan O’Connor said more TAFE investment, including expanding a menu of fee-free courses, would help address shortages.

But convincing enough skilled tradespeople to take a pay cut to teach at TAFE also had to be achieved.

“I need industry to understand that if they need the skills for their industry … then we need to work out a better way to supply the trainers and teachers needed,” he told ABC Radio.

The Master Builders data estimates about 500,000 of the 1.1 million forecast homes will be apartments and units.

Multi-dwelling building commencements are expected to outstrip detached housing in the ACT and NSW in 2024 and make up about 43 per cent of new home starts in Queensland and Victoria.

Despite his state’s predicted shortfall, NSW Premier Chris Minns backed the high national targets.

Ambitious goals were more important than “having mushy targets that we meet, or we never meet”, he told reporters.

The five-year forecasts come amid a housing crisis marked by record low rental vacancies, young people priced out of home ownership and decades-low levels of social and affordable house construction.

Slow approval rates, poor planning and incentives that strengthen the hand of investors and first-home buyers are among the factors being blamed.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton said the coalition was working on a major housing policy for the next election, hinting at supply-side incentives and reduced migration.

“It kills me that young Australians have lost the dream of home-ownership,” he told ABC Radio.

Draft laws to spur on more build-to-rent complexes were meanwhile unveiled by Treasurer Jim Chalmers.

The model had been successfully used overseas to increase housing supply, he said.

Tax discounts would apply for projects of at least 50 dwellings available to rent for the general public, held by a single owner for 15 years and where one in 10 units were offered at a 25-per-cent affordable housing discount.

HOME BUILDING FORECASTS 2024-2029:

(Jurisdiction, current forecast, percentage behind target)

Australia – 1.087m (9.4 per cent)

NSW – 348,000 (7.3 per cent)

Victoria – 286,400 (6.8 per cent)

Queensland – 241,000 (2.0 per cent)

Western Australia – 114,600 (11.9 per cent)

South Australia – 55,500 (33.3 per cent)

Tasmania – 15,500 (39.6 per cent)

Northern Territory – 1855 (83.6 per cent)

ACT – 24,400 (exceeds target by 16 per cent)

  • Source: Master Builders Australia

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

2 Responses to Tradie shortage dooms new-homes target

Uncle Red says: 9 April 2024 at 4:18 pm

Shortage of skilled tradespeople was forecast at least 30 or 40 years ago and the federal government’s “program to increase apprenticeships”, during the early 1990s, as far as I remember, turned out to be all talk and no action. Housing shortages are not resolved by importing “skilled” labour.

Reply
David says: 10 April 2024 at 7:22 am

However, it’s somewhat irrelevant as we cannot actually build affordable houses for the people stuck in the renting spiral even if the extra tradies existed. The cost of a house is too high including newly built houses. The obvious evidence of this is the continuing run of builders going bust. A clear sign the commodity they are trading in is too expensive for the market. Also, the idea of taxpayers subsidising cheap houses is doomed to fail. The problem is too big.

We are not going to build our way out of this and belief that we will do this is just pushing us further down the wrong track.

One solution would be to make housing cheaper but we cannot afford to do this as it would have a huge impact on existing home loans, so we cannot make then significantly cheaper.

So, we need to stall demand so we can deal with the backlog. i.e. limit immigration inline with projected increases in housing availability. i.e. if we are building 1000 more houses a month beyond current demand then we can have an immigration level to match that excess housing. And no, immigration is not the answer to housing supply because housing is too expensive to build.

We need to convert renters into owners where possible. Rent is dead money, you never get in back and end up with nothing at the end of the day and long term renters are on the path to relying on welfare for all their retired lives. We are generating a welfare bomb for generations to come. The answer to that is raising the age of retirement. Put you hand up if you want that! To convert renters to owners we need to persuade landlords to sell up, not at reduced prices but no landlord should be making money out of renting a property that a potential home owner could be buying. Priority needs to be given to owner occupiers and landlords need t be significantly taxed and that tax invested into public housing.

We also need to make better use of what stock we have. Look at it like a business. Your in trouble so you make use of all the assets. Vacant houses need to be highly taxed, if they not physically helping the housing crisis then the tax they generate can be used to help. Long term rents should be preferred over short term leases. A rented property under a long term lease should be taxed at a much lower rate than short term leases/stays.

And finally, we cannot afford for houses to become cheaper and we need as many private owner occupiers as possible so we need to put more money in the pockets of owner occupiers. i.e. we need to change our tax system away from an income punishing system and have less reliance on personal income tax.

Remember its a crisis and the stress is destroying families and costing lives. Australia needs to make significant changes to stop the spiral. Once we’ve change direction and reset the balance we can adjust the rules to match the circumstances but our inability to make big changes is costing us dearly. No doubt people will argue against many of the ideas based on the belief that once the change occurs it is set in stone. That arguments needs to be dismissed because if we can make the change raising the argument we can also make the change in the future to address the concern when the time is right.

Of note, there’s nothing really original in any of this as I’ve just brought together what has be commented on in many places.

The real issue is why aren’t the politicians do anything about it that will make a significant change. Ask yourself how many politicians are personally benefitting from being landlords? Also ask yourself why it is the politicians with personal investments in housing (landlords) are allowed to make decisions that affect the housing/rental market when they should be declaring it as a conflict of interest.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews