News location:

Saturday, September 28, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Why are hybrid cars suddenly so popular?

Photo: Kindel Media

Hybrid cars are having a moment – even though they’re dirtier than we think. HUSSEIN DIA looks at what’s behind their popularity. 

Just last year, data suggested plug-in hybrid cars were on the way out in Australia. But they’re back. New data shows plug-in hybrids and conventional hybrids combined have overtaken battery electric vehicle sales in the first quarter of 2024. The trend continued during April and May.

In the first quarter last year, hybrids accounted for 6.8% of all car sales. In the same period this year, their share has almost doubled to 13%. Similar trends have been reported in international markets.

This is concerning. Although hybrids are cleaner than traditional petrol and diesel cars, they still burn fossil fuels and produce more emissions than their manufacturers claim. They’re no match for zero-emissions battery electric vehicles.

So why do consumers want hybrids? Let’s find out.

What makes a hybrid?

Two types of hybrid vehicles are proving to be popular with consumers.

  1. Conventional hybrids: these combine an internal combustion engine with an electric motor and battery. They use regenerative braking to convert energy created from braking into electrical power to recharge the battery. You cannot plug them in – the only way to get energy into the car is by filling them up with petrol or diesel. The advantage is they drive further on a tank of petrol or diesel than a traditional car.
  2. Plug-in hybrids: these vehicles also combine an internal combustion engine with a larger electric engine and a battery. The difference is you can charge their batteries directly using a power outlet. Plug-ins also use regenerative braking to recharge the battery. They can drive on battery power alone but the fuel engine kicks in when the battery level drops or if more power is required.
Hybrid versus plug-in hybrid.

Both types of hybrid are cleaner than traditional internal combustion counterparts. But they are not as clean as battery electric. They have been found to run more often on their petrol or diesel engines than their electric motors and produce substantial emissions.

By contrast, battery electric vehicles run only on an electric motor and batteries. They produce zero emissions while driving, and can – if charged off your solar array or green power – be extremely low emissions to charge. You never need to fill up at a petrol station. You can often charge them at home, or at public chargers.

Why are hybrids so popular right now?

It’s not by chance. Hybrids are being heavily promoted by carmakers as a transitional step to cut emissions from transport. Notably, Toyota, the world’s largest carmaker, is sceptical of battery electric vehicles and is instead focusing on hybrids until, it says, public chargers are widespread and electric cars are cheaper.

Plug-in hybrids are particularly popular in Europe. In 2022, they made up two-thirds of sales in Greece and more than half in Belgium, Spain, Italy, and Finland. The average across the European Union was 44%.

Hybrids have also become popular for a number of other reasons.

For one, they are cheaper than battery electric. They’re also cheaper to run than internal combustion vehicles.

But there are other factors at work. Hybrids reassure drivers worried about the range of electric cars. Drivers see the internal combustion engine as a backup. They also have stronger torque and acceleration than traditional cars.

This, for many drivers, is enough to offset their disadvantages, which include a higher purchase price than traditional cars. For plug-in hybrids, there’s another consideration – the large battery often means there’s less boot space, often resulting in no spare tyre. And then there’s the emissions.

Hybrids are not much cleaner

Hybrids – especially plug-ins – have been found to produce more emissions and cost more to run than their manufacturers claim.

Recent real-world tests on a sample of 123,740 plug-ins in Europe showed their carbon dioxide emissions were, on average, 3.5 times higher than the laboratory values reported by manufacturers. Why? Because in practice, plug-ins weren’t being charged and driven in electric mode as frequently as expected.

In the lab, average emissions for plug-ins was about 40 grams per kilometre. When experts tested new plug-in hybrids, they found average real-world emissions were vastly higher – 139 grams per kilometre. That means they’re only 23% lower than petrol and diesel cars, which emit an average of 180 grams per km.

table showing plug-in hybrids pollute more in real world testing than manufacturer claims
European real world testing has shown plug-in hybrids run much more like fossil fuel vehicles than electric. WLTP refers to standardised laboratory testing. European Commission, CC BY

These test results also show large differences in average fuel consumption. The yearly cost of fuelling plug-ins was nearly double what manufacturers claimed, costing European plug-in drivers on average A$960 more a year on fuel.

In reality, this means plug-in hybrids are not being driven as electric cars – they’re largely driven as fossil-fuel burning vehicles.

What does this mean for Australian drivers?

Hybrids came under the spotlight in 2022, when the Greens and independent senator David Pocock jointly opposed the federal government’s Electric Car Discount Bill – because it included plug-in hybrids in the list of vehicles exempt from fringe benefits tax.

They argued plug-ins are effectively a fossil fuel technology which should not be subsidised. Labor eventually agreed to end the subsidies for plug-in hybrids from April next year.

Labor also committed $14 million to fund a local real-world fuel testing program for 200 models.

The testing began in the second half of 2023. Initial tests of five hybrid models have revealed similar trends to Europe, though not as extreme. Fuel consumption of these models is up to 12% higher than laboratory tests.

table showing hybrid testing results for real world use
These are the early results from Australia’s real-world emissions and fuel consumption testing of hybrids. Grey shows laboratory (WTLP) results, yellow shows real world results. Australian Automobile Association, CC BY

The road ahead

Are hybrids a waste of time and resources? Not necessarily. Many drivers are sceptical of battery electric vehicles, find them too expensive, or are worried about being caught away from a charger. For these drivers, hybrids may make sense.

But we cannot spend too long on these transition vehicles. Electrifying our vehicle fleet alongside boosts to public transport, cycling and working from home can help rapidly cut emissions from transport – a sector whose emissions are steadily growing.

By 2030, the International Energy Agency forecasts the cost of most electric cars will be comparable to their petrol counterparts due to falling prices. Top Chinese brands such as BYD are already approaching this.

As we approach price parity and charging infrastructure becomes more common, it’s likely more and more drivers will feel comfortable leaving fossil fuels behind for good. The Conversation

Hussein Dia, Professor of Future Urban Mobility, Swinburne University of Technology. Republished from The Conversation.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

THE CONVERSATION

THE CONVERSATION

Share this

One Response to Why are hybrid cars suddenly so popular?

David says: 29 June 2024 at 11:35 am

Here’s something interesting for you, an MG4 EV comes with a 50kwh battery and the whole thing costs 40k. That’s $800/kwh or $4000 for a 5kwh battery. Assuming the rest of the whole car is free. It’s not, so taking that into account and the need for an inverter for solar systems that don’t already support batteries, a 5Kwhr system should cost ~$3000. It doesn’t and you are looking at twice that as a starting point. Next you might ask why don’t people just buy an MG and use it as their house battery and they also get a free car with it? Well they need V2G and Australia as per usual is dragging its feet on this under the guise of waiting for appropriate standards requiring every man and both their dogs to approve everything, even though all the technology, expertise and standards exist overseas. Could be done in months, coordinated globally with guidelines for EV manufacturers and it would make EVs far more compelling. I wonder why the government hasn’t highlighted this and thrown resources in getting the required approval for V2G asap ?

Furthermore, did you know Australia actually has significant solar power and a lot of it is going to waste ? The reason is to feed power back into the grid you need to raise the voltage. There is a limit on how much the voltage can be raised required to protect equipment connected to it. So, if you have a whole lot of solar panels in a segment of the network where the limit is reached, that power is lost. Remember solar power is generation has big peaks when the sun shines. To access that power requires significant network changes so that the peak solar power during the middle of the day can be feed back into the network to the closest stored device. That’s a lot of cost if you plan to stick large batteries in only a few locations around the area. Sounds like the cost of power will continue increasing so we can actually store the solar power. Well, that’s not quite true. If every solar panel had a battery connected to it, between it and the grid, then the need to push power back into the grid would be greatly reduced, the loss of power would be greatly reduced and the need to keep upgrading the power network would be significantly reduced. Wins all around and a reduction in emissions as more of the green power is getting stored and used. Now replace ‘battery’ with ‘car battery’ and you reduce the number of batteries required plus get more people out of carbon burning vehicles. It’s a no brainer and a must if the focus is on reducing carbon emissions plus the cost of needing to continually upgrade the existing network infrastructure. So why isn’t the government prioritizing this as it would be a great counter to the coalitions nuclear plan?

There is so much that could be done now yet everyone is more focused on what the opposition is doing rather than holding the current government to account for it significant failings in protecting the environment.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Opinion

KEEPING UP THE ACT

KEEPING UP THE ACT reports verbatim how Nurse Rach took four years (and an impending election) to waffle her way to giving junior doctors what they were owed.

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews