News location:

Monday, March 17, 2025 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Coalition backs AUKUS as sub concerns rise to surface

Australia will lose sovereignty, security and money under the AUKUS partnership, says a former PM. (Richard Wainwright/AAP PHOTOS)

By Tess Ikonomou in Canberra

Peter Dutton has backed in AUKUS while pledging to ensure the partnership succeeds, as critics urge Australia to change course on its plans.

The support comes after former Liberal prime minister Malcolm Turnbull said Australia had no guarantee it would get the promised nuclear-powered submarines as the sale must not degrade the undersea capabilities of the US Navy.

“The most likely outcome of the AUKUS pillar one is that we will end up with no submarines of our own,” he said while speaking at Parliament House on Monday.

“There will be Australian sailors serving on US submarines, and we’ll provide them with a base in Western Australia.

“We will have lost both sovereignty and security and a lot of money as well. That’s why I say it is a really bad deal.”

Mr Dutton said he believed strongly in the AUKUS defence agreement and praised Anthony Albanese as then opposition leader for the bipartisan support.

“The need for AUKUS is greater than ever,” the opposition leader said in Melbourne.

“Anyone who objectively looks at the deal that we’ve struck with the United States and the United Kingdom sees a capability that will underpin our security for the next century.

“As the prime minister points out, we live in the most precarious period since the Second World War … they’re saying that we want to see AUKUS succeed and we are absolutely dedicated to making that the case.”

Asked about reports US President Donald Trump supported the AUKUS partnership, Mr Turnbull said “of course he’d like it”.

“It’s such a bad deal for us … (Mr Trump) might be thinking, ‘who are these dumb guys that agreed to this deal’?”

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth in February said the president supported the $368 billion deal after Australia made an $800 million downpayment for the plan to acquire nuclear-powered submarines.

Under the trilateral agreement with the US and UK, Australia has been promised at least three Virginia-class submarines from the US in the early 2030s, before a new fleet of boats is built for delivery from the 2040s.

Senior US military officers have described the partnership as “ironclad”.

But Mr Trump’s pick for defence policy under-secretary, Elbridge Colby, has previously questioned selling submarines to Australia because it could leave the US Navy “vulnerable” if there was military conflict with China.

A grassroots anti-AUKUS movement called Labor Against War has written to federal Labor MPs and candidates urging them to jump ship “given the tremendous upheaval in US-Australian relations in recent days and weeks”.

Former Labor senator and campaign patron Doug Cameron said persisting with AUKUS would detract from the “many achievements of Labor in office and strengthen those who would profit at the expense of peace and diplomacy”.

“The first few weeks of Trump’s presidency demonstrates he is belligerent, untrustworthy and dangerous,” he said.

“There are other more realistic and cost-effective strategies to protect our territorial integrity without subjugating ourselves to a dangerous, unpredictable and unworthy Trump administration.”

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

One Response to Coalition backs AUKUS as sub concerns rise to surface

cbrapsycho says: 17 March 2025 at 12:39 pm

Agree completely with Doug Cameron & Malcolm Turnbull, along with all the Defence experts who’ve been saying this was a bad deal for a long time now. Just look at the UK position, where now they are dependent on the US for using their nuclear arsenal. Very worrying given Trump’s friendship with Putin and his opposition to most of Europe and other former allies.

It is really stupid to outsource Defence strategy and resources to the US or any other nation, as there’s no guarantee that they’ll agree with what we want to do to protect ourselves. Covid taught most of us that we need independent supply lines, so we’re not constrained by what’s happening elsewhere.

Aside from supply issues, we need submarines, other boats, planes and technology (including drones) focussed on protecting our vast coastline, rather than going over to China. Currently we have little ability to oversee our own coast, with smuggling a major problem and too much ease of access to our waters, fishing stocks and landing points by other nations.

We need to spend money on our current issues that need to be addressed now, rather than on things that are unlikely to occur except in paranoid security agents’ nightmares. Honestly, why would China want to occupy our country? It’s too big and unmanageable. They have much greater benefits at lower cost by trading with us, investing here and working with us on mutually beneficial projects. Current risks to our security are within, rather than from outside of Australia as ASIO acknowledges, aside from the need of refugees who more often access Europe & the US than here.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews