News location:

Friday, November 22, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Surveillance of shoppers raises concerns

Supermarkets are lifting surveillance but a lack of communication could get shoppers offside.

By Katelyn Catanzariti in Sydney

BIG supermarkets are being warned that increased surveillance of shoppers, including close-up cameras on self-checkout screens, is more likely to anger shoppers rather than deter theft.

Consumer behaviour expert Nitika Garg from the School of Marketing at the UNSW Business School says it certainly won’t do much to build trust with customers.

“Especially when, in Australia, we see the billions of dollars in profit that the two largest grocery retailers get,” Professor Garg told AAP.

“(Consumers) feel like ‘you’re making billions of dollars of profit off my back and you’re doing this to me?’

“That will trigger people to engage in deviant behaviour.”

While most shoppers do the right thing, cost-of-living pressures are driving up opportunistic theft, resulting in a surge in shoplifting across the board.

Australian Bureau of Statistics data points to a 17 per cent increase in retail location theft in 2022/23.

In August, Coles chief executive Leah Weckert said shoplifting by organised criminals and customers contributed to an annual 20 per cent rise in stock losses.

“We’re certainly seeing a lot more reports coming through from stores where they see a loss that is quite large and targeted,” she said.

Rightly, supermarkets say they have no choice but to increase surveillance.

Woolworths has announced plans to spend $40 million on CCTV upgrades, body-worn cameras and other surveillance measures. Coles is stepping up security guards at stores and introducing initiatives such as trolley locks and smart gates, and is trialling live camera surveillance on self-checkout screens.

Some checkouts have on-screen cameras and customers see live footage of themselves scanning items.

But many shoppers have taken to social media to voice their disapproval. Some are worried about their privacy and what happens to the footage, while others are just angry about being distrusted.

The issue has been raised on platforms like Reddit and TikTok where users have variously described it as “dystopian” and “invasive”.

“We always knew we were being watched… but this sort of super surveillance is just making consumers feel less trusted,” says Prof Garg.

The researcher also argues the increased scrutiny could trigger some to misbehave, given the propensity of people to retaliate when they feel their freedoms are being restricted or curtailed.

“This is a consequence of psychological reactance; it pushes people to do the opposite of what they are told,” she adds.

One issue is the lack of communication from supermarkets about why they are increasing surveillance.

“A small campaign explaining to the consumer the impacts of shoplifting will help,” Prof Gard said.

“The higher amount of shoplifting takes a hit on all consumers as the price of products is increased to account for the stock loss.”

Major supermarkets such as Coles and Woolworths have privacy policies that address the use of anti-theft measures and adhere to an industry code of conduct.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Australian Associated Press

Australian Associated Press

Share this

4 Responses to Surveillance of shoppers raises concerns

Keith says: 5 November 2023 at 10:08 am

“Rightly, supermarkets say they have no choice but to increase surveillance.”
Not “rightly” at all. They can see shoplifters easily now with existing surveillance. They just choose not prosecute the offenders. I have seen shoplifters walk out of Woolworths in Dickson, their pockets overflowing with stock, past the “security guards” who saw and understood what was happening, but did nothing.
We are left with the impression that supermarkets employ security guards solely to intimidate honest shoppers.

Reply
S. Draw, K. Cab. says: 5 November 2023 at 9:17 pm

What a treasure trove. Match your:
– face
– credit card
– wifi
– blue tooth
– diet
– & fancies

Enough there to match with any of your online profiles. Enjoy!

Always the pup; security and safety.

Reply
Curious Canberran says: 5 November 2023 at 4:49 pm

I have to disagree Keith.
CCTV is primarily used (re: shoplifting) after the fact in a court to prove the theft.
Why should a S.G. put themselves at risk over $20 worth of ‘stuff’.
People have been killed in a brawl because of such minor items.
Should a guard in a bank fight back against armed robbers – of course not.

SG’s are actually present to protect staff from unprovoked violent/aggressive behavior.
Particularly at night when people are drunk/drugs. That’s when a SG needs to step in.
They are not there for a ‘Hollywood’ style take-down of petty shoplifters – it simply isn’t worth the risk.

The store should hand the CCTV to the police and let them follow-up.
That’s how it works with the least level of risk to everyone – particularly the SG.

Personally, I think this sort of ‘finding’ by Marketing Research is questionable – but I guess I am the rare person that isn’t concerned about CCTV or a feeling of intimidation.

Reply
cbrapsycho says: 6 November 2023 at 1:39 pm

The big corporates seem to see their customers as a nuisance to be treated with contempt. If there was more competition we could go elsewhere. However, our governments of all flavours have allowed them to dominate our world, putting customers last after shareholders. They seem to forget where their income originates and continues. Time to increase competition. What is the ACCC’s job?

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews