News location:

Wednesday, November 20, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Jurors face prosecution for own research

The new legislation introduces majority verdicts in territory criminal offences, where courts may now accept a verdict if 11 out of 12 jurors agree.

ACT jurors who conduct their own investigations outside of the courtroom face prosecution under new legislation passed by the legislative Assembly on Wednesday.

The Crimes Legislation Amendment Act 2023 makes it an offence for jurors to seek information about a trial independently, such as through online searches.

The legislation follows the sensational derailing of Bruce Lehrmann’s criminal trial in the ACT Supreme Court in October 2022 over the alleged rape of fellow Liberal Party staffer Brittany Higgins. Mr Lehrmann has always denied the charges.

A juror was found in possession of material that had not been presented as evidence, against the judge’s specific directions.

Before this revelation, after more than four days of deliberating, the 12 jurors had passed a note to ACT Chief Justice Lucy McCallum saying they could not agree on a unanimous verdict.

This is also remedied in the new legislation, which introduces majority verdicts in territory criminal offences, where courts may now accept a verdict if 11 out of 12 jurors agree, helping to prevent hung juries and the need for retrials.

“In a diverse community people may not always agree, resulting in hung juries. This not only causes delays and increased costs, but also adds emotional strain for victims, accused people and others involved in the proceedings,” said Attorney‑General Shane Rattenbury.

“These reforms will help prevent retrials and give the community confidence in our jury system.”

 

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

2 Responses to Jurors face prosecution for own research

David says: 10 April 2024 at 3:20 pm

Wow, after hearing and seeing all the evidence that has been made public since the trial in the Higgins/Lehrmann saga how does anyone have confidence in the legal system. It seems pretty clear why the juror did their own investigation. What isn’t clear is why the jury saw so little of the evidence available. We clearly need a system where people with only law degrees do not get to decide what evidence jurors should be allowed to see.

Reply
Curious Canberran says: 10 April 2024 at 4:51 pm

“….where courts may now accept a verdict if 11 out of 12 jurors agree” – that’s a slippery slope.
Why not 7/12 – that’s a majority.
Let’s go after jurors now – what a knee jerk reaction.
Just make sure you use a VPN with your on-line research.
Ah yes, the legal system – so much confidence in it these days.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews