RSPCA accept police assurance they didn’t actually hit the dog with capsicum spray

Share Canberra's trusted news:

Policeman pepper sprays dog

FIVE days after the incident went public the RSPCA have made a public statement on the video of a police officer pepper spraying a chained dog.

We have continued to be in touch with the AFP regarding this incident. Many people may not realise that police officers are also authorised by the Animal Welfare Act as animal cruelty inspectors. Since the original complaint went to the AFP rather than to RSPCA ACT, they are obligated to continue with this investigation even though it is an internal case.

Since our RSPCA inspectors are not armed or trained in self-defence by us, we often work with the AFP to handle the more difficult cases. In these other incidents, we have found their officers to be quite professional and to take their duties regarding animal welfare very seriously. The fact that this recent incident has occurred by an authorised animal cruelty inspector as a police officer is disturbing. However, it has not been something that we have witnessed before from other officers.

We have offered our assistance to the AFP in this matter. They have told us that the dog was not actually hit by the capsicum spray. However, they did not know whether or not it was hit by the stick that was thrown. We will continue to stay in touch with them as their internal investigation progresses, and will let you know about any new information that we might receive regarding this case.

Who Can You Trust?

In a world beleaguered by spin and confused messages, there's never been more need for diverse, trustworthy, independent journalism in Canberra.

Who can you trust? Well, for more than 25 years, "CityNews" has proudly been an independent, free, family-owned news magazine, serving the national capital with quality, integrity and authority. Through our weekly magazine and daily through our digital platforms, we constantly and reliably deliver high-quality and diverse opinion, news, arts, socials and lifestyle columns.

If you trust our work online and believe in the power of independent voices, I encourage you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support will be invested back into our journalism so we can continue to provide a valuably different view of what's happening around you and keep free.

Click here to make your donation and you will be supporting the future of journalism and media diversity in the ACT.

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Previous articleParking changes at Canberra Hospital
Next articleRampaging puppies become art


  1. So what if it didn’t hit? It was aimed to hit a tied up dog. The fact that they sprayed the dog and then threw a stick is outrageous. Ask the vet the dog went to if the dog had sore dry eyes before taking their word for it!

  2. The headline of this article is very misleading. The RPSCA’s press statement says “[The AFP] have told us that the dog was not actually hit by the capsicum spray”. Nowhere in the statement does it say that the RSPCA accepts this version of the events as correct, the RSPCA is just repeating what they were told.

    Internet sensationalism at its finest.

Leave a Reply