Government still messing with Gungahlin centre

Share Canberra's trusted news:
Blocks for sale… the high-rise future for Gungahlin town centre.

“Local politicians have been mostly absent from the planning debates with Labor politicians more committed to being part of Team Labor than representing constituents while the Liberals remain silent,” writes “Canberra Matters” columnist PAUL COSTIGAN. 

IN late 2019 the ACT government proposed to vary the plan for the Gungahlin town centre. It didn’t take long for the Gungahlin Community Council to spot the devil in the detail – or to be more accurate – what detail went missing.

Formerly, the government’s introduction for the town centre was: Gungahlin town centre is the major hub for employment, shopping, social activities and public transport particularly serving suburbs within the Gungahlin district. 

In the new draft – this sentence disappeared. 

The Planning Directorate is defining Gungahlin as a dormitory set of suburbs (people sleep there, but travel elsewhere for work). Removing this sentence also takes away the notion of providing services – such as community, cultural, sports and cultural facilities. Neat trick! 

Unlike the historical model for such town centres where the government was the developer and facilities were part of that package, this centre followed the private-developer-led model. 

For Gungahlin the developers were given the opportunity to build a commercial centre with all the usual community and cultural services to materialise as needed. Nice theory!

The Suburban Land Agency is selling off the land to the east of the centre for apartments. The trouble is not just that there will be more towers, it is more about what goes missing as a consequence. 

Locals accept that surface parking will eventually go but would have expected the planning bureaucracy to have put in place adequate transport linkages to enable easy access to public transport. Wishful thinking?

The tram has been a success for those heading into Civic for work. However, that depends on getting access to parking or having the set up for securing bicycles. 

As more surface car parks go, there is no planning for how the ever-increasing number of commuters are to access the tram. There has been little planning for better cycle paths and, mysteriously, the government neglected to provide a secure cycle shed for commuters. 

Then there are the ever-increasing towers. A former planning minister, Andrew Barr, made this commitment: “I believe you can reassure your council that there is no risk that a ‘skyscraper’ would be approved for the Gungahlin town centre, unless such an outcome was to be arrived at through the town centre study, with the community’s support.” 

Put that together with recent surveys by the Gungahlin Community Council that residents do not support any more residential towers in town centres. Yet the Suburban Land Agency has listed the sites for sale as having an increased focus on residential – more towers. There is little provision for services let alone for the commercial activity that had been listed previously.


Going up… a high-rise block for sale in Gungahlin. Photo: Paul Costigan

The Gungahlin community desperately wants to work with the government. This requires a willingness by the government to genuinely listen and not to reinterpret the community’s feedback – as keeps happening. 

The government has firmly dropped all notions of long-term, people-focused planning. Local politicians have been mostly absent from the debates with Labor politicians more committed to be part of Team Labor than representing constituents while the Liberals remain silent. 

It is doubtful that the ACT Greens are using this increasing urban design mess around the town centre as an example of their achievements by being in coalition with Labor. Likewise, it would be doubtful if the chief planner uses this in his boastful presentations at planning conferences. 

Those who have worked hard to assist the community and have a voice about their town centre are at a loss to understand how the Chief Minister, planning ministers and the planning chief could be proud of where the centre’s development is heading. 

Instead the government carries on being relaxed about allowing ad hoc decisions to hinder good urban development in and around this town centre. 

Things could have been better given the commitment of locals over many years. It is still not too late to transparently engage with the residents who like the place and can see how it could be even better.

Paul Costigan is an independent commentator and consultant on the visual arts, photography, urban design, environmental issues and everyday matters.

Who Can You Trust?

In a world beleaguered by spin and confused messages, there's never been more need for diverse, trustworthy, independent journalism in Canberra.

Who can you trust? Well, for more than 25 years, "CityNews" has proudly been an independent, free, family-owned news magazine, serving the national capital with quality, integrity and authority. Through our weekly magazine and daily through our digital platforms, we constantly and reliably deliver high-quality and diverse opinion, news, arts, socials and lifestyle columns.

If you trust our work online and believe in the power of independent voices, I encourage you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support will be invested back into our journalism so we can continue to provide a valuably different view of what's happening around you and keep citynews.com.au free.

Click here to make your donation and you will be supporting the future of journalism and media diversity in the ACT.

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Previous articleBelco Bill’s in with a big chance being elected
Next articleRunning Shaun still collecting sporting accolades

2 COMMENTS

  1. Paul is very diplomatic here. It is too late to change the Government’s view as it would require giving up the chimera of revenue from land sales, fees, charges and ongoing rates. This package presents as a large amount of money that can be used against other grand projects.

    Sadly, as Paul notes, it results in an empty town. And it betrays to baseline philosophy of the Gungahlin construct. It was supposed to be a town centre built for the 21st century. Now it appears to be a monument to ponzi schemes.

    It is a common refrain, but a refrain worth developing during this enforced solitude, where is the Opposition here? And where are the big ideas for the future? Because the status quo can no longer continue.

Leave a Reply