Why all the endless planning upset for residents?

Share Canberra's trusted news:
A development application in Macgregor. Photo: Paul Costigan

“The Planning Directorate under this Labor/Greens government is seen as being dysfunctional and no longer capable of delivering a liveable city for the future generations,” writes “Canberra matters” columnist PAUL COSTIGAN

IN 2010, Dickson residents lodged objections to a unit development and eventually took the developer and the ACT Planning Directorate through the appeals tribunal and won. 

Paul Costigan.

Following that ruling, the developer completely revised the plans, residents went along with the new concept and the units were built. 

A long list of issues was identified with the original plans. The plot ratios were questionable and many measurements did not add up. Residents thought that the government planners had failed to do their job. They had made little attempt to correct obvious faults and had allowed the development application to go to consultation thinking that no-one would notice. The neighbourhood joined in the action to object.

Once the event was over, there was hope that the planning bureaucracy may have learnt something. The deputy planning chief was Ben Ponton. Instead the ACT’s planning regime has become more complicated and harder for residents to understand. Most residents would have little chance of getting their heads around proposed residential developments.

Having observed Canberra’s planning for many years, a consistent factor is how the Planning Directorate continues to upset neighbourhoods by allowing awful development applications to be considered. 

Things have been getting worse – not better. Based on how residents see themselves treated through the planning processes, the only conclusion people can come to is that the Planning Directorate regards residents as a nuisance, that residents do not know anything about their suburb and do not appreciate the wonders of development. 

As a result of this culture within the Planning Directorate, residents are treated as an annoyance to be dealt with using whatever means at hand.

Despite how bad things are with neighbourhood planning decisions, the larger corporate developments have tended to hog the media attention. Meanwhile the soul-destroying neighbourhood developments continue. The Planning Directorate continues to allow questionable development applications to sail through the assessment processes. It is largely left to residents to identify faults, to deal with the tricks and to make sense of what is happening in their neighbourhoods.

This brings me to the latest that has been brought to my attention. The block, a former Mr Fluffy site, is in the established suburb of Macgregor in West Belconnen. The developer said to the neighbours that he was going to build two two-storey houses for his children. 

The neighbours to the site in Macgregor have already identified questionable measurements within the plans, what is stated is not necessarily what is presented, they have serious issues with the plot ratios and feel as though the whole game is being stacked against them. The development application contains information about the relationships between the developer, the developer’s family and the Planning Directorate. 

The application is signed by a couple. However, it is the father, who has professional connections with the directorate, who is dealing with the residents as if he is the developer. Family members have been or are still employed within the Planning Directorate. The neighbours are concerned about their chances of having a fair hearing.

When it comes to suburban residential development applications, everything points to the ACT Planning Directorate’s processes being completely broken, having been distorted by mismanagement and lobbying. 

The Planning Directorate under this Labor/Greens government is seen as being dysfunctional and no longer capable of delivering a liveable city for the future generations. 

Neighbourhood development should be a number one priority issue for the next government. A new form of planning directorate is required – with new leadership. Andrew Barr needs to be grilled about what he intends to do (if he wins) to change the culture of his Planning Directorate. He promised changes in 2016 – but the reality is it is much worse.

 

Who Can You Trust?

In a world beleaguered by spin and confused messages, there's never been more need for diverse, trustworthy, independent journalism in Canberra.

Who can you trust? Well, for more than 25 years, "CityNews" has proudly been an independent, free, family-owned news magazine, serving the national capital with quality, integrity and authority. Through our weekly magazine and daily through our digital platforms, we constantly and reliably deliver high-quality and diverse opinion, news, arts, socials and lifestyle columns.

If you trust our work online and believe in the power of independent voices, I encourage you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support will be invested back into our journalism so we can continue to provide a valuably different view of what's happening around you and keep citynews.com.au free.

Click here to make your donation and you will be supporting the future of journalism and media diversity in the ACT.

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Previous articleTelling stories of ‘place’ in portraiture
Next articleRevealed: the backroom faces in fight for your vote

2 COMMENTS

  1. Developers and those they donate to, make poor planners. I remember a meeting where the head of planning told us their job was to facilitate what developers wanted.

Leave a Reply