News location:

Canberra Today 17°/20° | Thursday, January 20, 2022 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Of Christmas, trees and seeking biodiversity

The Civic Christmas tree… the City Walk trees are glorious, whereas this plastic construction was pretending to be something it was not. Photo: Paul Costigan

“There desperately needs to be a complete change to the approach to planning. Biodiversity – plants, trees, shrubs, water, animals and insects – need to be the priority consideration,” writes “Canberra Matters” columnist PAUL COSTIGAN

WANDERING through Civic, there loomed ahead a shape. 

There it was, the latest gift to Canberra residents from the ACT government’s City Renewal Authority; its version of a Christmas tree for when you don’t really want to be jolly, but have to do something. 

The contrast with its surroundings was stark. The City Walk trees are glorious. Whereas this plastic construction was pretending to be something it was not.

When it comes to trees and biodiversity this government pretends to be committed to greenery, whereas what we get most of the time is spin and little real action. Write them a letter questioning commitment and back comes blah, blah, blah! Bah, humbug to the writers of such rubbish!

Recently there has been a small group of blokes pop up at community meetings as well as online (same people) accusing residents in established suburbs of stopping younger people getting into homes. 

This Labor-linked cabal is pushing a dubious line that, by coincidence, directly reflects the spin used by the government and its developer associates. They state that in questioning inappropriate development, the community groups are causing a housing shortage. Bah, humbug to the politicians who put these people up to this naive carry-on.

There’s not enough space to outline in detail the silliness of the argument that residents looking after the future liveability of their suburbs are somehow blocking new housing. 

To start, have a look around our suburbs and you will see loads of new housing appearing. Instead of dealing with those distractions, here’s a point or two that should form the basis of debates into 2022. This presumes that the ACT Greens and their Labor colleagues are interested in providing suitable housing for Canberra’s future residents.

The issue seems to be that the basic residential zone (RZ1) needs to be done away with to allow for more choices of housing – ignoring that there is the full suite of housing already available. 

We need to stop debating plot ratios, how to divide up established blocks and how much should be squeezed on to smaller and smaller sites. The more intelligent approach would be to base planning decisions on how developments add to the biodiversity of the suburb and the city.

Start by introducing a biodiversity index for the city, for all suburban precincts and then, as that is used, develop and apply biodiversity criteria to each development. 

Rather than all the usual complex and inaccessible planning criteria that is being randomly implemented by the planning directorate, and given that the future of the planet is what we need now to focus on, the main criteria for future planning should be to ensure the old and new suburbs become more liveable while doing everything possible to still have a planet to live on.

This is not a request for politicians and bureaucrats to establish one of their meaningless taskforces or legislative sub-committees. It is a request that the government take actions by urgently looking at the well-established biodiversity indexes used internationally and to put one into practice in 2022. By using one already established, those using it will soon identify what needs to be adjusted.

There desperately needs to be a complete change to the approach to planning. Biodiversity – plants, trees, shrubs, water, animals and insects – need to be the priority consideration. 

Saving the planet, increasing the biodiversity and greenery urgently should not be exclusive of there being more development within all the suburban areas. It is about having a completely forward-looking approach – doing something real about climate change and creating places for people to live comfortably as the temperatures rise and energy becomes more expensive.

The catalyst for these suggestions was that fake Christmas tree in Civic. A final suggestion would be for our Fun-Leader, the now senior Andrew Barr, to engage new designers for next year’s Christmas with something really wild and spectacular along Northbourne Avenue. Something jolly, something that will not only celebrate Christmas but also highlight the beauty and importance of greenery and biodiversity in Canberra. 

Merry Christmas to our readers.

 

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Paul Costigan

Paul Costigan

Share this

3 Responses to Of Christmas, trees and seeking biodiversity

Rohan says: December 15, 2021 at 10:40 am

If you don’t allow greater density in inner parts of the city while the population grows, you will have to build more greenfield suburbs over the top of habitat. Habitat between streets, over fences and around our houses is far less rich and important for the preservation of threatened species than undeveloped areas outside the city, and unfortunately we must pick one. While this choice is zero-sum, the balance between urban greenery and greater density is not, we can have both, as countless other cities do throughout the UK and Europe. Denser cities are also far “greener” in terms of reducing greenhouse gas emissions because they reduce travel distances, increase efficiency of construction material use (more people per ton of concrete/steel), reduce infrastructure (roads, pipes, garbage, fire etc.) requirements and encourage people to walk and take advantage of public parks, street trees and shared spaces. Canberra is very very low density and the example of other older cities should be considered. You really have missed a few critical points here.

Reply
Andrew says: December 15, 2021 at 6:56 pm

Agreed – what about the biodiversity and environmental impacts of developing the Western Edge Investigation, or Ginninderry (a development far enough out of town that we might have to move the ACT border)? Canberra’s a popular place to be, and if we don’t have urban infill, we’re going to end up with the far worse consequences of urban sprawl.

I think Singapore – a city with about the same land area as Canberra but with 13 times the population – does a pretty good job of managing to maintain urban greenery in spite of ridiculously high density, with lots of urban parkland. Canberra will never be anywhere near as dense as Singapore, so we’re clearly in no danger of density causing environmental catastrophe.

Reply
S.Draw K.Cab says: December 17, 2021 at 6:39 pm

@Rohan I won’t even say you’ve missed the point. But you’ve made a beaut straw man argument: Density per se, was never challenged by Paul Costigan.

“A straw man is a form of argument and an informal fallacy of having the impression of refuting an argument, whereas the proper idea of the argument under discussion was not addressed or properly refuted. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.

then

“habitat between street… is so far less rich and important for the preservation ..unfortunately we must pick one.” Not it’s not. What it is, is an unsupported opinion.

Sadly your take on the problem raised by Paul simply demonstrates an incredible lack of imagination. Very Canberra Labor, very Australian.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Opinion

How fairly has Australia advanced?

The contention around Australia Day grows with each passing year and now, says NICK OVERALL, more than ever, it’s important to ask the question, what is the history of Australia Day and does it have a future?

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews