News location:

Canberra Today 3°/8° | Sunday, April 28, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Light rail doubts as bridge heritage listed

Commonwealth Avenue Bridge. Photo: Paul Costigan

UNCERTAINTY surrounds the light rail route to Woden following the inclusion of the Commonwealth Avenue Bridge on a major heritage list.

It comes after Lake Burley Griffin and adjacent lands, including both Commonwealth and Kings Avenue bridges, were added to the Commonwealth Heritage List.

The listing – which has taken 12 years – was signed off by federal Environment Minister Sussan Ley before the election was announced. It also includes Scrivener Dam, Stirling Ridge, Yarramundi Reach, and Attunga Point.

The Lake Burley Griffin Guardians have welcomed the lake’s inclusion on the list saying it shows “respect” for the lake as the “central feature” of Canberra.

But the group’s members are unsure how the listing will affect stage 2B of Canberra’s light rail route, set to run across the lake via the Commonwealth Avenue Bridge.

“We really don’t know how the listing will affect the light rail crossing the lake,” said Juliet Ramsay of the Lake Burley Griffin Guardians.

“We haven’t seen final plans for the light rail, we just know vaguely that there are plans to put a new bridge between the two expanses of the Commonwealth Bridge but we don’t know what else.

“How the new bridge is designed and how it fits with the existing bridge will need to be considered…all the things that are valuable about the lake will have to be protected.”

In the listing document – released by the government – Ms Ley said she had examined the Australian Heritage Council’s assessment as well as public comments provided to the council, and was satisfied the lake met heritage listing criteria.

“The construction and completion of Lake Burley Griffin demonstrates the push for national development during the years immediately after Federation and before the First World War, and again after the Second World War, under the Menzies government,” the minister’s declaration says.

“The lake’s design reflects the influence of three major urban design movements including the City Beautiful movement, the Garden City movement and International Modernism.”

The listing document also stated the lake had environmental significance, and is home to threatened species like the striped legless lizard and Murray Cod.

“We are pleased with the listing… the lake has suffered a lot over the last few years, there have been some unfortunate impacts in terms of developments so this way it can be protected, hopefully,” Ms Ramsay said.

A nomination for Canberra the Planned National Capital to be included in the National Heritage List was rejected by minister Ley.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

5 Responses to Light rail doubts as bridge heritage listed

Palmerston's Lament says: 10 May 2022 at 3:17 pm

The bridge issue has long been a major challenge for the Tram Lobby, and to date nothing has been produced that makes any sense. How this gets spun as a positive will be a delight to watch given the dollars being put in play to lift sunken roads and smooth gradients.

Reply
Christopher Emery says: 10 May 2022 at 5:03 pm

I was told by the LR original chief engineer that the existing bridge is strong enough to carry light rail using a shared lane.

Reply
Colin Smeal says: 10 May 2022 at 5:26 pm

This is good news and may put a stop to the folly of the 19th century tram. Right now Brisbane is trial in trackless trams – in essence rubber tyres multi carriage vehicle that do not require overhead power or hugely expensive rails – why can’t Barr and co. see the sense in this alternative>

Reply
Ben says: 11 May 2022 at 2:19 pm

The so-called “trackless tram” is literally just a very expensive bus that carries no more passengers than an existing bendy bus. And it is hugely expensive – $1,2 billion. The glorified buses cost 8 times as much as a conventional bus of the same capacity.

Reply
Jaycee says: 11 May 2022 at 10:07 am

Trackless trams are far more flexible, wouldn’t need tracks to be laid, could start as soon as the vehicles were purchased, could use the existing roads, could use new lanes built down Adelaide avenue, wouldn’t need bridge works, wouldn’t need complete re-levelling in Civic.
They’re the obvious answer.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews