News location:

Canberra Today 2°/5° | Sunday, May 22, 2022 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Meetings, briefings, morning teas… but any more trees?

A recently cleared block for Housing ACT. Photo: Paul Costigan

“This government is failing when it comes to enhancing and maintaining the complexities of the tree canopy, the biodiversity and the green infrastructure of this city,” says “Canberra Matters” columnist PAUL COSTIGAN.

LAST week, the ACT Environment Minister, Rebecca Vassarotti, announced her draft action plan about the loss of mature trees.

Paul Costigan.

This document was supposed to convince voters that her government takes such matters seriously. It was a draft action plan.

This draft is like so many of the plans, strategies and policies announced by this ACT coalition government. It is full of useful words such as guidance, investigating, reviewing, revising, data, developing policy, making reports, more reports, more policy, encouraging, seeking, linking, negotiating, facilitating, considering, evaluating, more considerations, and even more reviews.

Expect there to be many meetings, workshops, briefings, morning teas and paid consultants. But will there be any more trees?

This government needs to stop its own agencies chopping down trees. ACT Housing needs to stop clearing everything off its residential blocks. ACT Housing developments should have permeable surfaces and a generous amount of greenery. Suburban developments need to have greenery cover of at least 30 per cent.

The ACT Environment Minister should stop thinking that “taking action” means publishing loads of worthy words. It is time to do something real.

This government is failing when it comes to enhancing and maintaining the complexities of the tree canopy, the biodiversity and the green infrastructure of this city.

The picture at the top is of a block in Dickson that has just been cleared by Housing ACT. This is an arm of the Labor/Greens government that is supposed to be delivering against the announced policies on greenery, tree canopy and mature trees. 

House removed for Housing ACT – many of the original plants still in situ. Photo: Paul Costigan

The picture above is what was there after the building was removed. Housing ACT bulldozed the lot. Is this what the  Environment Minister endorses as being an action plan?

This is a photo of a recent set of units in Dickson.

While the buildings are of an acceptable design (if you like that institutional look), the landscape is mostly hard surfaces. The announced government draft policies state that developments should have permeable surfaces. 

There is not a lot of greenery on this site. What would be the percentage tree canopy cover? Not much above zero!

Housing ACT has yet to read the Environment Minister’s announcements and those draft policies. Maybe they ignore those worthy sounding announcements because they know that they are just that – announcements and nothing more.

Plans for ACT Housing’s contribution to heat islands in Dickson.

Then there were those amazing plans by Housing ACT for another site in Dickson where the street tree was about it for greenery. It remains a world-class heat island in the making.

But wait, there may be more of this to come very soon.

A site in Dickson waiting for ACT Housing’s bulldozers to arrive. Photo: Paul Costigan

The above is a photograph of another site in Dickson that has had the Mr Fluffy house removed. As yet, the generous greenery and magnificent trees have been left alone.

Housing ACT is about to start work on this site and has already signalled that at least one of the mature trees must go. Neighbours are fully expecting most of the shrubbery to be bulldozed.

The plans reveal Housing ACT’s approach to greenery – large buildings with minimal opportunities for gardens.

The above horror stories are matched with many others throughout Canberra. Blocks are being cleared, huge houses occupy most of the site with little room for gardens and outdoor spaces and the suburban tree canopy, green infrastructure and biodiversity is being reduced

This is what the ACT Greens in government are delivering through Housing ACT. This is their real action plan. This is their version of “Building the Better Normal”.

The Environment Minister should stop making announcements. She needs to get real and take action on how her own government is failing to deliver on climate change issues within its own urban development programs. 

This piece has focused on greenery and trees around Housing ACT residences. So much more could be said about the lack of solar and the lack of double glazing in these 21st century homes.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Paul Costigan

Paul Costigan

Share this

One Response to Meetings, briefings, morning teas… but any more trees?

Bjorn says: April 4, 2022 at 2:19 pm

Dickson units – “There is not a lot of greenery on this site.” I think this contradicted by his own photo. I see a well developed tree overhanging from the left, a decent garden bed with mulch and water tolerant grasses, a grass area that should take hold and a newly planted tree in the background. The park bench has what I believe is scoria rock around its base (a permeable surface) and the path on the left looks also to be gravel rock (again permeable). It looks to me as a a fair balance between greenery and practicality – I mean people have to actually use the area and park cars and so forth. A picture speaks a thousand words. I would also believe that the EER of the units is good (water tanks, insulation, solar etc…) – but I don’t see any comments about that in the article.
As far as the block of land in Dickson goes – I personally too would bulldoze it and start anew.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Opinion

Sneaky weekend changes threaten backyard greenery

"It looked as if the Planning Directorate had quietly slipped in these massive variations... hoping that no-one was going to notice it. And the minister signed this?" Columnist PAUL COSTIGAN exposes some bureaucratic funny business.

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews