News location:

Canberra Today 4°/13° | Sunday, April 28, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

ACT’s clear disregard for indigenous voices

“Since 2020, Aboriginal leaders have unsuccessfully asked for an inquiry into the justice and corrections systems. In contrast, when concerns were raised about the handling of the Lehrmann case, an inquiry was announced within days,” says Liberal MLA ELIZABETH KIKKERT. 

POST-referendum, many people are asking what should now be done to address the gap between indigenous and non-indigenous Australians? 

MLA Elizabeth Kikkert.

I say that the ACT government must start listening to existing voices and then take decisive action.

There may be no clearer evidence of this government’s disregard for the voices of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people than its unenthusiastic implementation of recommendations from the Our Booris, Our Way review into child welfare. 

As opposition spokesperson for Families and Youth, I have been deeply distressed by this agonisingly slow response.

The all-indigenous steering committee first met in February 2018 and by August that year had delivered an interim report with four early recommendations. 

The committee pleaded with the Labor-Greens government to implement those four recommendations immediately “to accelerate improvements to the child protection system so that the community may see change during the review”.

That was five years ago. As reported in the update tabled in the Assembly in May this year, not one of those first four recommendations has been fully implemented. 

In fact, the Implementation Oversight Committee accepts that only two of 36 total recommendations have been completed (with one more at the monitoring stage).

Things may finally be starting to improve, according to the committee’s chair, but only after facing down this government’s “ferocious indifference when it came to a commitment to action to implement recommendations”. 

The chair has also noted that: “Throughout the review, many attempts were made to diminish our voices and our decisions”.

Acting decisively to implement reforms is as important here in the nation’s capital as it is in regional and remote areas. In my shadow portfolio of Corrections, the gap is in fact the nation’s widest.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics’ latest “Prisoners in Australia” report reveals that indigenous men in the ACT are imprisoned at a rate 19.6 times greater than non-indigenous men, 17.5 times greater if age-standardised data are used. Both measurements are the worst rate ratio in Australia.

Indigenous women in Canberra are locked up at a rate 47.4 times greater than non-indigenous women! This is not just Australia’s worst rate ratio but is more than double the national average.

While the imprisonment of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people has increased everywhere over the past decade, it has increased faster in Canberra than anywhere else. On average, indigenous admissions into the ACT’s prison have grown by 5.7 per cent per year.

Likewise, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander recidivism rate here is the nation’s worst. Fully 94 per cent of indigenous detainees at the Alexander Maconochie Centre have a prior conviction. Lack of required support and services during and after incarceration contributes to this outcome.

Detainees had no access to structured education for two years. Employment opportunities continue to be very limited, as does access to computers and higher education. The long-promised reintegration centre still has not been funded, and the transitional release centre has not yet been used to its full potential. Post-release throughcare is limited and often ineffective.

Since July 2020, local Aboriginal community leaders have repeatedly asked the ACT government for a fully independent board of inquiry into the territory’s justice and corrections systems to identify exactly what is going wrong and why, and to make recommendations. The government response to these united voices has been “no”.

In contrast, when concerns were raised about the handling of the Bruce Lehrmann case in December 2022, an inquiry was announced within days, and by February the government had funded it with $4.3 million. The only possible conclusion is that the inquiry requested by Canberra’s Aboriginal leaders does not hold the same priority for this Labor-Greens government.

That conclusion is supported by the first piece of advice one ACT government office gave to officials before a roundtable with these same indigenous leaders (as revealed in documents I obtained through FOI): “The meeting needs to have modest goals for what will be achieved by government”. The deafening “no” from ACT Labor and the Greens has certainly met that objective!

I thank the strong, united Aboriginal voices that are seeking to guide us forward when it comes to closing the gap in this territory. 

Diminishing or disregarding those voices, as the current Labor-Greens government regularly does, is wrongheaded. 

Promising to take decisive action when the government’s actual agenda is “modest goals for what will be achieved” serves only to increase cynicism and foster resentment.

Voices lose their value when ignored. The ACT government should commission and fund the board of inquiry that has been requested, should implement all Our Booris, Our Way recommendations as a matter of urgency, and should commit itself to listen more seriously to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voices.

Liberal MLA Elizabeth Kikkert is the opposition spokesperson for Indigenous Affairs.

 

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

3 Responses to ACT’s clear disregard for indigenous voices

David says: 31 October 2023 at 9:07 am

Kikkert shouldn’t be surprised that the answer appears to be no. The elephant in the room is the inability or risk of people saying why. In simple terms, high incarceration can be the result of two things. One, people being incorrectly being charged, two, lots of people committing crimes. The article reads as though the issue is the first one, hence a justification into the justice system would appear to be justified. However, if it is the latter then such an inquiry would be sending all the wrong messages. It could be seen as, keep committing crimes as we’re working on closing the jails down. The solution to solving high numbers of people being convicted for rape is not to make rape legal. Jail is a last line deterrent for criminals. You take that away or water it down and you just make being a criminal more attractive.

It could be that people are being incorrectly charged but this doesn’t appear to be an argument being used. That on the backdrop of Australia having a very balanced legal system where we don’t have laws based on religious concepts. Theft, murder, abuse and rape are something that should not be legal or marginalized in any community in Australia.

High incarceration rates is the smoke of the fire of high crime rates. Investigation of the justice system has the potential of being the same as setting up a large fan to blow the smoke out of a house on fire. The answer would appear to be no to Kikkert because if we want a long term solution the investigations and money should be spent on the fire. Stop focusing on whether you have the right Band-Aids in the cupboard and try to stop the need to go to the cupboard.

Reply
G Hollands says: 31 October 2023 at 11:30 am

Agree with David. There is no suggestion that the incarceration rates are the fault of prosecution issues at all. If people continue to break the law, and they go to gaol, surely the responsibility for that goes to those committing the crimes? Stop putting the cart before the horse, address the real issue here please?

Reply
Hamba says: 1 November 2023 at 9:53 am

I’ve worked in a prison (not the AMC). Of course people are there because they’ve committed crimes. What happens to them IN and at the point of release FROM prison is out of their hands. It can be corrective or not. It can be educational or not. It can prepare them for release or not. Appropriate supports can strengthen the likelihood of succeeding on the outside. Detainees can be made better or worse by what they experience.

Unless one wants to argue irrationally that somehow law-breakers in the ACT are far worse than those across the rest of Australia, we clearly have issues with what is (or isn’t) happening in our prison. The right (and simultaneously the most cost effective!) approach is to aim for genuine correction. We know about half of what’s not right in this territory. We need to get the full picture (‘fire’ AND ‘smoke’), and then we need a government that actually cares to do something about it. ACT Labor and the Greens clearly don’t give a damn about having a functioning prison.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Opinion

Why respect is a two-way street in law

Legal columnist HUGH SELBY offers a spirited response to an opinion column by Kelly Saunders in which she posed the question over a defendant's right to silence in a sexual assault prosecution. Selby argues she's wrong... 

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews