News location:

Canberra Today 9°/14° | Sunday, April 28, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Big problems for a little street in Garran

Overview of the proposed car park entrance on Robson Street, Garran.

“A car park on Robson Street, Garran, for the school was debated 10 years ago and the plan was dropped given the obvious issues it would have caused. Despite that bit of history, the consultant report sees no problems with 400 car movements a day being added to this narrow street,” writes “Canberra Matters” columnist PAUL COSTIGAN.

WHAT is being threatened to Robson Street in Garran is an example of how the ACT Greenslabor government goes about causing anxiety among residents when such time-wasting exercises could be avoided easily.

Paul Costigan.

The government proudly announced in 2021 that the Garran Primary School, a very popular school, is to be expanded. The consultant’s November 2022 report sets out the reasons why the site alongside the school needs to have the lease varied so that the expansion of the buildings, landscape, facilities and car parking can be undertaken. It is a long-winded consultant planning report that dares anyone to read it and remain sane.

Most of the report findings are fine except when it comes to traffic and parking. Anyone who has experienced being around a school at drop-off and pick-up time knows that traffic and parking issues are not managed well by planners or by any of the consultants who operate as the planning directorate’s outsourced planners.

Garran Primary needs the expansion. But what does not need to happen is for some of the traffic issues to be moved on to Robson Street – a street behind the school.

A car park on Robson Street for the school was debated 10 years ago and the plan was dropped given the obvious issues it would have caused. Despite that bit of history, the consultant report sees no problems with 400 car movements a day being added to this narrow street.

According to the report, extensive consultations were held. As happens with these top-down consultations, most of Robson Street probably did not respond and therefore by default were taken as being supportive of the school expansion. But little did they know that they were giving the nod to a new car park having its entrance/exit on to their narrow and, at times, busy suburban street. Now it is apparent that almost all do not support this.

The proposed car park entrance onto Robson Street.

The fix is relatively easy. The section of the car park nearest Robson Street could be realigned to have the entrance/exit on to the major through street, Kitchener Street, which is now the entrance for the present car park. That fix is being ignored by those being contacted by residents.

Robson Street is relatively narrow. If cars are parked on one side, then drivers have to give way as two cars have difficulty passing each other. Unfortunately, this street is also used by some who love to make rapid shortcuts and so travel through at dangerous speeds, despite the presence of the pre-school, the 40 km/h signs and others indicating the presence of elderly residents.

Once upon a time, good planning would have avoided such anxiety. Instead, it now takes hours on the phone trying to get politicians to get involved (did not happen), hours contacting residents to conduct their own surveys and then time finding out who to send submissions to and finally the writing of letters.

All this because someone did not think that pushing 400 or more car movements on to this street was silly, especially as the alternative remains obvious.

The more stupid thing was a notice last November informing a few residents that if they wished to respond to these suburban changes, they needed to go online and submit something in the context of the new planning reforms. That’s not easy for people with no planning background and probably little knowledge of any of the stuff around district strategies, a new territory plan and the other mountain of planning reform documentation.

All this is happening unnecessarily because the ACT planning directorate conducts its business with little regard for those who live in Canberra’s suburbs.

These residents, many of them retired, wish to live peaceful lives and had no desire for unnecessary disputes with their local government, their local politicians and the government’s hierarchical and inaccessible planning bureaucracy.

Is there anyone sensible left in this government? If so, please sort this out.


Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Paul Costigan

Paul Costigan

Share this

5 Responses to Big problems for a little street in Garran

Zhi says: 18 February 2023 at 6:39 am

We live in Gay Pl. We are fully supportive of your options and suggestions. Happy to sign a petition or contribute if needed. Zhi

Reply
Kerry Dent says: 18 February 2023 at 5:05 pm

Why not an entrance in one street and exit in the other street, streamlining traffic without too much triffid activity in either street.

Reply
Bob French says: 19 February 2023 at 8:46 am

If you keep voting the same donkey’s in every election you end up with politicians who become deaf, lazy and arrogant to any commonsense alternatives to their own stupidity.
Born and bred Canberran this why I moved to NSW as I saw the demise of Canberra after being forced into self government and problems as this one posted becoming normal.

Reply
Karen says: 19 February 2023 at 7:16 pm

Thank you for highlighting what is but one of the multiple traffic, planning and parking issues in Garran that are largely dismissed by this current, care less government.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Opinion

Why respect is a two-way street in law

Legal columnist HUGH SELBY offers a spirited response to an opinion column by Kelly Saunders in which she posed the question over a defendant's right to silence in a sexual assault prosecution. Selby argues she's wrong... 

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews