News location:

Wednesday, November 13, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Does the housing minister know how to read?

Housing and Suburban Development Minister, Yvette Berry… “she and her staff seem to be ignorant of research and policies on solar, energy efficiency, landscape design, biodiversity, green-infrastructure and urban climate change,” writes Paul Costigan.

“Yvette Berry, as housing minister, has the unenviable reputation of being a failure in the adequate provision of social housing,” writes “Canberra Matters” columnist PAUL COSTIGAN.

RECENT opinion pieces highlighted the ACT government’s badly managed planning authority and how they continually ignore their own rules and then object when they are overruled by the appeals tribunal.

After a decade of this maladministration of the planning directorate, no-one has been held responsible for this flagrant waste of resources. 

When it comes to the outrageous decisions about the development applications and the poor performances in building of social housing, there is one Greenslabor minister in the frame.

Yvette Berry, as housing minister, has the unenviable reputation of being a failure in the adequate provision of social housing. Her reputation was not helped by her government’s sale of major social housing complexes along Northbourne Avenue and within the inner south of Canberra. 

While scattering communities to all corners of the city was horrible, the real injustice was that the funds raised from the sales were allocated to pay for the tram – not replacement housing. 

They knew what they were doing. They used housing funds to buy an expensive red tram set while people had to suffer even longer without a roof over their heads.

Add to that were her politically motivated evictions of housing tenants in order to bolster the kitty given the repeated underfunding for social housing. And still they claim to be progressive!

This Greenslabor cohort constantly talks about addressing climate change and looking after the environment. Their environmental claims fall flat given that trees and greenery are constantly being removed, heat island suburbs continue to be built, biodiversity is going backwards and little within their proposed planning reforms seriously addressed climate issues (spoiler – it was not about planning – it was about deregulating development).

The ACT government had many opportunities to be a leader on urban environmental issues. The most obvious is that it is a developer through its agency, Housing ACT. This agency could have taken the lead to build high-quality residences that demonstrate how to address climate change. Unfortunately for the city, under the poor leadership of Berry, Housing ACT has failed as a built-environment leader.

It starts when the agency moves to rebuild a home already allocated for social housing. More often than not, the bulldozers are sent in and everything goes. All the building materials end up being dumped. All the shrubbery and many trees are removed and trashed. That amount of removal is not exactly being environmentally sound – nor very intelligent. 

This is the way it has always been done and no amount of information about what should be happening in the middle of a climate crisis has changed the thinking. Vandalism continues. 

One statement not long ago from Berry was that an inner-north house was more than 40 years old and was past its use-by date. That raised a few eyebrows from particular residents in the inner north living in homes that were as old or older. 

Many have managed to retrofit an older house and have homes well adjusted for using less energy and being far more environmentally friendly – as well as being comfortable no matter what the outside temperature.

Many of Housing ACT’s houses being demolished could be retrofitted and in some cases another residence or two (depending on the zoning) could be built alongside the original. There are very good examples of inner Canberra private homes being renovated and extended where they also maintain most of their gardens, their shrubbery and biodiversity. 

This could also be happening with most of the homes, trees and biodiversity destined to be felled by Berry’s bulldozers. These new homes should have solar, be fully insulated and have double glazing. Such leadership would be a small step to matching the rhetoric of how Greenslabor is working to deal with climate issues in urban developments. 

Does the ACT Housing minister know how to read? Judging by their actions as the government developer, Berry and her staff seem to be ignorant of research and policies on solar, energy efficiency, landscape design, biodiversity, green-infrastructure and urban climate change.

Then there are the serious governance issues within the ACT’s chief planner’s directorate. The planning directorate remains the agency signing off on fault-ridden development applications submitted by Housing ACT, on behalf of minister Berry. This agency places minimal priority on climate and continues to approve social housing homes that will not be pleasant places to live in future decades. 

This agency needs to be swept clean of those responsible for the continued maladministration of these priority city building matters.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Paul Costigan

Paul Costigan

Share this

3 Responses to Does the housing minister know how to read?

Nerida says: 25 March 2023 at 9:14 am

Hear Hear!! And this government needs to be swept clean of the arrogance, disrespect, and lack of care it deals out to its citizenry. Hmm. Not much left after that big sweep.
(As far as I’m aware Ms Berry’s evictions are still current and not a thing of the past as suggested by “Add(ed) to that were her politically motivated evictions …….”)
I love reading your articles, and City News, such a great relief to hear a few sane voices in all this madness.

Reply
Mike of Canberra says: 25 March 2023 at 4:32 pm

It is hard to envisage the ACT being more poorly served than it is now at the hands of this ACT Government and, in particular, its hapless Housing Minister Yvette Berry. This is the Minister who, when she was in the process of demolishing large complexes such as Stuart Flats in Griffith and the Northbourne Avenue public housing flats, declared herself to be opposed to “concentrations of disadvantage”. Yet she goes ahead and re-creates smaller “concentrations of disadvantage” in suburban streets amongst unprotected private residents. In one small street in an inner suburb that I know of there is already a concentration of public housing of upward of 60%, with the logical approach seeming to be to ease this overcrowding by selling some dwellings and attempting to disperse this concentration across a broader area. So what does this Minister do? She goes ahead and adds to the concentration to the point where the street looks likely to contain twice as many public housing dwellings as private ones. Additionally, she has been determinedly hands-off in her approach to managing her own estate, allowing houses to be left empty and derelict or to be trashed by their tenants, while she turns a determined blind eye. Is there any end to the incompetence of this Minister?

Reply
Chris says: 20 June 2023 at 2:24 pm

As someone who has cleaned up the trashed house after public tenants have left and just get transferred to a new place so they can do it all over again. And at the same.time my family is on the public housing waitlist for over 2 yrs now. But when you contact a.c.t housing all you get is I DON’T KNOW, you are just going to have to wait. In the 2 yrs we have been waiting,not once have we been contacted to say we are progressing forward.typical canberra.government, only appearing to care when they think it makes.them look good

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Letters

By George, we would have had a better city

"There was nothing wrong with the economics of Henry George. But his very correct proposals have since been swept under the carpet, or cancelled, by self interest, greed and exploitation," says letter writer TIM WALSHAW, of Watson. 

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews