News location:

Canberra Today 4°/7° | Sunday, April 28, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Gallagher has questions to answer on Higgins: McKenzie

Senator Bridget McKenzie is seeking clarification on Brittany Higgins’ compensation payout. (Lukas Coch/AAP PHOTOS)

By Andrew Brown in Canberra

NATIONALS senator Bridget McKenzie says Finance Minister Katy Gallagher still has questions to answer on her knowledge of rape allegations made by Brittany Higgins.

The federal opposition launched repeated attacks on Senator Gallagher in parliament over the possible use of the former Liberal staffer’s rape allegation for political gain.

Senator Gallagher was accused of misleading the Senate by suggesting she was not aware of Ms Higgins’ rape allegations before they were made public in 2021, despite leaked text messages suggesting otherwise, claims denied by the senator.

Despite the repeated questioning, Senator McKenzie said Senator Gallagher still needed to address aspects of the case.

“There are very legitimate questions when it became apparent that Senator Gallagher knew prior to these allegations being made public,” she told ABC’s “Insiders” program on Sunday.

“Questions still remain about the compensation payout (received by Ms Higgins)… there are still legitimate questions to ask about that process.”

In 2021, Ms Higgins alleged she was raped by fellow Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann in the office of then-minister Senator Linda Reynolds two years earlier, which he has always denied.

She reached a confidential settlement with the Commonwealth in December 2022 after she launched legal action against her employers in the former coalition government.

Senator Gallagher said the repeated questioning in relation to the allegations would be a deterrent for other women coming forward, sentiments that have been echoed through the week by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

But Senator McKenzie said the opposition had struck the right tone with the questioning during Senate question time throughout the week.

“We were sticking to the factual pieces that we wanted to ascertain, and I think that was the right way to go,” she said.

 

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

2 Responses to Gallagher has questions to answer on Higgins: McKenzie

jennifer manson says: 19 June 2023 at 10:07 am

There ARE still questions to be answered. Katy Gallagher clearly did mislead Parliament in her initial statement which may have been unintentional. There is no doubt that her angry statement ‘no-one knew anything’ is untrue. However, the conspiracy to policitise theory is ridiculous given the time frame of 4 days and the fact that she told no-one. Penny Wong was clearly surprised and shocked by the suggestion.

With regard to the compensation payment, there needs to be more transparency around the reasons for compo being paid, whether or not the amount is revealed. Non-disclosure agreements are a travesty of justice, hiding wrongdoing by organisations and hampering improvements to prevent future problems.

Reply
David says: 19 June 2023 at 10:44 am

Gallagher’s behavior is the deterrent to other victims coming forward. The current message being put out is the truth doesn’t matter. Journalists tend to celebrate whistle blowers but in the Higgins case the person who leaked recordings is not being celebrated. How dare they expose the truth of the situation. We should be questioning why the law has reached a point where no-one seems to be questioning why the jury wasn’t played the voice recording in full. It is clearly relevant to understanding the case. The rogue juror now appears to be at fault because they were trying to understand the truth. Like with the Folbigg case, we have reached the point where cases are beyond the limited capabilities of lawyers yet they are allowed to operate outside of the quest for truth. How do you tell a future victim, come forward and tell the truth and the right outcome will occur? The Higgins case, whether guilty or innocent, went the way it went because the truth become a forgotten player. All those people who took an alleged rape case and tried to personally profit from it need to publicly own up and clear the air for future victims thinking about coming forward so they know they won’t be treated the same.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews