News location:

Monday, December 23, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Lehrmann inquiry head could face probe over report leak

Walter Sofronoff gave reports to two journalists without the permission of the ACT government.

By Maeve Bannister in Canberra

THE chair of an inquiry into how the justice system handled Brittany Higgins’ rape allegations could be referred to the ACT integrity commission for leaking the final report to two journalists. 

Former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff led a board of inquiry set up to examine accusations from police and prosecutors about the conduct of each other during Bruce Lehrmann’s high-profile rape trial.

The territory government received the inquiry’s final report last Monday and had intended to release it by the end of the month after the findings had been considered by cabinet.

But Mr Sofronoff provided a copy to two journalists at separate media outlets without the knowledge or permission of the territory government, which resulted in widespread reporting of the negative findings against the chief prosecutor involved.

The report was provided on the basis of an embargo until it was made public.

In one case, a report was provided to a journalist before the chief minister had received it.

ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr said he was extremely disappointed about the leak and described it as a lapse in judgment by Mr Sofronoff.

He revealed Mr Sofronoff had admitted he gave background information to select journalists during the inquiry, which the chief minister said he had not been aware of.

“(Mr Sofronoff) breached his good faith to me by releasing that report ahead of giving it to who he was meant to under the legislation,” Mr Barr said.

“I think he had a view that the reporting might be more accurate if journalists were provided copies in advance, but he placed his faith in a particular individual and that faith proved to be massively misplaced with huge consequences for everyone.”

He said the government was considering its options about how to deal with the breach and multiple leaks throughout the inquiry.

“There are many possible pathways. It might be that a full referral to the integrity commission to examine the conduct of the inquiry may be a pathway, the government will seek advice on that,” he said.

“This (inquiry) should have drawn a line under this matter, but unfortunately whilst the recommendations are sound and we have accepted them … the leaking and the engagement with journalists on the way through leaves in the minds of many people significant questions.

“It is just so disappointing.”

Mr Barr said Mr Sofronoff had neither offered him nor the government an apology.

Brittany Higgins accused Mr Lehrmann, her former Liberal staff colleague, of raping her inside a ministerial office at Parliament House after a night out in 2019.

Mr Lehrmann has always denied the allegation.

Prosecution correct to pursue Lehrmann, says report

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

3 Responses to Lehrmann inquiry head could face probe over report leak

Carol Drew says: 7 August 2023 at 6:31 pm

Talk about trying to twist things around – the judge gives the report to journalists first – as if that isn’t showing his bias against Drumgold. Sofronoff should join Sky after dark!

Reply
Marion Melrose says: 8 August 2023 at 8:34 am

Very strange that Sofronoff agrees the ACT’s top prosecutor was right to go ahead with the prosecution of former Liberal staffer Bruce Lehrmann yet throws Drumgold under the bus.

Reply
David says: 8 August 2023 at 6:36 am

The obvious approach was to release the report in full to media who are likely to cover the report in full.
You can decide if you believe the ACT government was planning on promptly releasing the report in full in an unbiased way, ensuring those cleared by the report were publicly cleared as soon as possible, which is the highest priority.
If you think they were then yes, the report should not have also been provided to the media but I suspect the ACT government would be annoyed but not complaining as the media was just backing up their release.
If you think the ACT was delaying the release, playing games, trying to avoid publicly clearing those cleared in the report for as long as possible then you wont be surprised that the ACT government is crying foul over one final chance to distort reality.
Isn’t that what got us into this mess in the first place? They knew it was coming, was of national interest and affected the lives of potentially innocent people. They should have been ready to publicly release the report within 24 hours with a preliminary response leading to a full response at a later date. Perhaps there should be a probe into the handling of the report by the ACT government?

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews