“If Greenslabor allows the new legislation to slide through, this city will have a deregulated development process that will operate mostly on the whim of the chief planner,” writes “Canberra Matters” columnist PAUL COSTIGAN.
WITH the formal consultations now closed on the ACT government’s planning reforms, many in Canberra’s community groups would be wondering about the motivations of the planning bureaucracy.
As draft documentation was drip fed to the community during 2022, it became clear that a game was being played out at the expense of the residents who cherished the city.
Yet despite the government’s disingenuous double talk, residents still involved themselves in the debates as they hoped that a new planning regime could be designed to deliver a city prepared for the complexities of the 21st century climate issues.
Based on those 2022 experiences, residents’ groups have concluded that they and the government had set out to achieve totally different outcomes.
While residents had responded on the basis that debates could lead to better planning and more intelligent development, the chief minister’s agenda had little to do with community engagement and respect for the city, its residents and the environment. It had very little to do with planning.
The new proposed system will be based on the deregulation of what is left of the planning system – being the mess made through consistently introduced variations to overcome the difficulties the former rules posed for developers.
If the new system is allowed through by the ACT Greens, decisions by developers will be based on their interpretation of vague guidelines and references to preferred outcomes. In most cases this will not involve regulations as residents would have experienced in the past and had hoped would be improved – not weakened.
In the last decade the planning authority made development decisions often with little regard to their own rules. This was the basis for the occasional successful appeals by concerned residents. These successes annoyed the planning bureaucracy as they worked with developers to make things easier.
The proposed new system will be their solution to having to consider their own rules. If Greenslabor allows the new legislation to slide through, this city will have a deregulated development process that will operate mostly on the whim of the chief planner. Those decisions will be very subjective. The basis for any challenge through the established appeals tribunal would be almost impossible. They will also not be able to be challenged by the Legislative Assembly (so why bother with elections?).
This has been the agenda of one politician, Andrew Barr, who has been a previous planning minister, an urban development minister and now chief minister and still the real planning minister.
He has an almost religious ideological belief that development should not be rules-based, but instead should have always been a deregulated market-driven approach.
For Barr, development is about investment and developers doing what they think is best for the city and less about the aspirations of residents for their families, homes, suburbs and the city.
Thanks to his obedient chief planner, this chief planning minister is about to achieve his ultimate legacy. He is responding to those pesky residents who go on about the concept of the “Bush Capital” or the “City in the Landscape”.
‘New suburbs are heat islands’
As has already happened, new suburbs are heat islands waiting to deliver very uncomfortable environments with many not able to be retrofitted for climate change. Under Barr’s new non-rules approach, residents in established suburbs will soon share in the pleasure of living in heat islands.
And a special thanks must go out to the ACT Greens. Thanks to their duplicity of occasionally talking about biodiversity and climate change while looking the other way as the chief minister’s agenda was rolled out, the new de-greening planning reform policies will most likely be implemented.
This progress towards deregulation has happened in plain sight throughout 2022 and into 2023. If the ACT Greens roll over on this one as they have done on many difficult and important issues, the city will need to have a bonfire party to welcome in Andrew Barr’s dream of Canberra becoming even more a tower-crammed, deregulated, heat-sland compact city.
That bonfire will be the destruction of evidence-based policies and research papers on good design, great landscapes, 21st century urban design, green infrastructure, biodiversity and good housing policies and much more. All such policy documents will be deemed redundant by the chief minister’s and the chief planner’s planning reforms.
That is, unless politicians such as Jo Clay and the ACT Greens wish to prove they have a real-world commitment to humanity and the environment while having respect for residents. If so, they need to say NO – enough is enough!
The chief planner’s proposals for reform need to be dropped. Those simplistic and vague deregulated development guides will be destructive for everything sane people believe in. Real professionals need to be engaged to involve residents in bringing about 21st century, climate-based planning reforms.
Who can be trusted?
In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.
If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.
Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.
Thank you,
Ian Meikle, editor
Leave a Reply