News location:

Canberra Today 8°/10° | Saturday, May 4, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Senate told ABC coronation coverage saw 1800 complaints

David Anderson told Senate estimates the ABC received 1800 complaints over its coronation coverage. (Mick Tsikas/AAP PHOTOS)

By Liz Hobday

THE ABC coronation coverage that led to Stan Grant stepping away as host of the “Q&A” program sparked about 1800 complaints from the public, according to the broadcaster’s managing director.

Hundreds of the comments sent to the ABC consisted of racist attacks, David Anderson told the Senate estimates hearing in Canberra, while other complaints said the coronation discussion was worthwhile but poorly timed.

“Some of it was in good faith, quite a lot of it was not in good faith,” Mr Anderson said.

Stan Grant made the decision to leave “Q&A” last week after racism against him intensified following his involvement in a panel discussion about the King’s coronation.

The veteran correspondent was invited to participate in the televised discussion on coronation day, during which he pointed out that the crown represents the invasion and theft of Aboriginal land.

Mr Anderson said he was worried about the ABC’s public-facing staff and flagged a review of whether the organisation was doing enough to support its employees.

“We’re coming to a precipice here, particularly the discussion around how we can protect our people,” he said.

Threats to the personal safety of staff have escalated, with the ABC referring more incidents to the police, according to Mr Anderson.

Online trolling has also intensified, and the broadcaster is increasingly withdrawing from Twitter in response, he said.

Mr Anderson also said he was especially worried about indigenous staff at the Voice referendum approaches.

News director Justin Stevens read out several headlines attacking the ABC’s coronation coverage that had been published and broadcast by commercial media.

There is a link between coverage of the ABC and its staff in commercial media and the abuse they were subjected to online, he said.

While ABC management did not want to give oxygen to media outlets that targeted Stan Grant, according to Mr Anderson, that was no excuse for a lack of support.

“I think the time for dignified silence is over, I think for our people we need to be certainly more public supportive of them as well as what we do internally,” he said.

Mr Stevens explained that Stan Grant had been subjected to relentless racism for a long time for doing his job, but the coronation coverage led to a particular spike in racial vitriol.

“We’re talking about a really large volume and torrent of racial abuse and threats to Stan and his family over the course of a number of days,” he said.

He also flagged that the organisation would change how it supported staff who were subjected to vitriolic abuse.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

One Response to Senate told ABC coronation coverage saw 1800 complaints

cbrapsycho says: 25 May 2023 at 12:39 pm

All those people who claim Australia is not racist, need to read this to understand what indigenous people face in the land of their ancestors. This is not equality, so we can’t claim that ATSI populations already get equal treatment. It is very clear that they need to be heard and they need their voices heard by government including the executive, to provide balance to the loud voices of those who oppose them, whether through racism, hate, ignorance or self-interest.

Hopefully these nasty people are few and thus can be overriden by the majority of Australians, those who really believe in equality. It is very sad that some of those opposing an ATSI voice are politicians and thus assumed to represent their electorates.

It is also quite likely that some opposing an ATSI voice are afraid of losing their open opportunities to exploit Australia for their own interest without having to face any opposition from landowners. The mining industry already has a loud and powerful voice, but does not really want competition and always opposes anything that restricts their exploitation of our land, whether to pay appropriate taxes, to avoid harming the environment or damaging sacred sites. Currently they act virtually unopposed, with little opportunity for voices that oppose their exploitation and harm to be heard, whether these are farming voices or indigenous ones.

The statistics on the harm done by ignorant management of ATSI peoples and Australian land make it clear that we need better informed decision-making, so let’s include those who know the land best and their people’s needs best.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews