News location:

Wednesday, October 14, 2026 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Sofronoff demands Barr retract ‘unethical’ claims

Walter Sofronoff has demanded the ACT chief minister retract suggestions about his conduct. (Jono Searle/AAP PHOTOS)

By Tess Ikonomou in Canberra

THE head of an inquiry into the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann has called on ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr to retract suggestions that he acted unethically in releasing his report to journalists.

Lawyers representing Walter Sofronoff have written to Mr Barr rejecting criticism he made at a press conference this month, about the former Queensland judge’s decision to provide copies of the report to two journalists before it was publicly released by the government.

The ACT government has previously said it was seeking legal advice if Mr Sofronoff breached the Inquiries Act.

Mr Sofronoff’s lawyers urge Mr Barr to make a public statement that the inquiry chair “neither breached the terms of the statute, nor did he act unethically”.

They also suggest Mr Barr could say he was now “satisfied that Mr Sofronoff performed his duties properly and fully”.

The former judge released letters on Thursday showing the correspondence with the ACT government over the leaked report.

Mr Sofronoff wrote that although he provided embargoed copies, one of the journalists later contacted him to say she had received another copy from another source and was at liberty to publish it.

“I have no reason to believe that she was lying to me,” his letter reads.

“I have not had my trust betrayed nor have I had any reason to be disappointed.

“The outcome of this process of professional engagement with journalists has been that, on the whole, stories about the inquiry have been on point and informative.”

In response to questions from Mr Barr about the disclosure of the report, Mr Sofronoff defended his decision to provide copies to the journalists.

Mr Sofronoff’s letter reads: “You have asked me “under what authority where (sic) those copies provided.”

“The direct and succinct answer to that question is that I furnished those copies under my authority as chair of the inquiry.”

The inquiry chaired by Mr Sofronoff examined accusations from police and prosecutors about each other’s conduct during Mr Lehrmann’s rape trial.

Former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins accused Mr Lehrmann, her ex-colleague, of raping her inside a ministerial office at Parliament House after a night out in 2019. Mr Lehrmann has always denied the allegation.

In October 2022, Mr Lehrmann faced a criminal trial in the ACT Supreme Court, but juror misconduct derailed the proceedings and the trial was discontinued.

The ACT’s outgoing top prosecutor Shane Drumgold dropped the prosecution against Mr Lehrmann, fearing the impact of a second trial on Ms Higgins’ mental health.

Mr Drumgold is taking legal action against the inquiry.

He resigned as director of public prosecutions in August after the inquiry made adverse findings against him.

 

News all day, every day at CityNews.com.au.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Australian Associated Press

Australian Associated Press

Share this

3 Responses to Sofronoff demands Barr retract ‘unethical’ claims

Tim says: 1 September 2023 at 4:24 pm

The ACT government seems determined to undermine the inquiry that it set up because it doesn’t like the findings. If there is this much politics involved in trying to bury the Sofronoff Inquiry’s report then it makes one wonder how much politics was involved behind the scenes of the investigation and then trial that preceded the inquiry.

Reply
Julie says: 1 September 2023 at 6:34 pm

Read the Act. And look at what happened with previous inquiries under this legislation. The Inquiries Act provides for the chief minister and the government to consider the report findings for up to a month then the law requires the governt to provide it to the assembly. In the past governments have taken several months to provide an official response to such inquiries. Just because journalists and other demand instant responses to further other agendas doesn’t meant it makes for good decisions or good government. This controversy is more about subverting justice and good government than about promoting it

Reply
Curious Canberran says: 1 September 2023 at 7:04 pm

That’s right. Regarding the terms of reference: “What is starkly missing is any reference to the serious allegations of ‘political interference’ and the conduct of the ACT attorney-general.” As stated by Liberal leader Elizabeth Lee (Feb 1st 2023) and reported by the good people of CityNews.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews